Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown variable effect on tinnitus. A prospective, randomized 6-month follow-up study on parallel groups was conducted to compare the effects of neuronavigated rTMS to non-navigated rTMS in chronic tinnitus. Forty patients (20 men, 20 women), mean age of 52.9 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.7), with a mean tinnitus duration of 5.8 years (SD = 3.2) and a mean tinnitus intensity of 62.2/100 (SD = 12.8) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0–100) participated. Patients received 10 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS to the left temporal area overlying auditory cortex with or without neuronavigation. The main outcome measures were VAS scores for tinnitus intensity, annoyance, and distress, and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) immediately and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The mean tinnitus intensity (hierarchical linear mixed model: F3 = 7.34, p = .0006), annoyance (F3 = 4.45, p = .0093), distress (F3 = 5.04, p = .0051), and THI scores (F4 = 17.30, p < .0001) decreased in both groups with non-significant differences between the groups, except for tinnitus intensity (F3 = 2.96, p = .0451) favoring the non-navigated rTMS. Reduction in THI scores persisted for up to 6 months in both groups. Cohen’s d for tinnitus intensity ranged between 0.33 and 0.47 in navigated rTMS and between 0.55 and 1.07 in non-navigated rTMS. The responder rates for VAS or THI ranged between 35% and 85% with no differences between groups (p = .054–1.0). In conclusion, rTMS was effective for chronic tinnitus, but the method of coil localization was not a critical factor for the treatment outcome.
ObjectivesSleep‐Disordered Breathing (SDB) is frequent in stroke patients. Polysomnography (PSG) and cardiorespiratory polygraphy are used to confirm SDB, but the need for PSG exceeds the available resources for systematic testing. Therefore, a simple and robust pre‐screening instrument is necessary to identify the patients with an urgent need for a targeted PSG. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the available methods to pre‐screen stroke patients possibly suffering from SDB.Materials and MethodsEleven studies out of 3,561 studies met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies assessed the efficiency of seven instruments based on the data acquired clinically or by inquiries (Berlin Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, SOS, Modified Sleep Apnea Scale of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire, STOP‐BANG, Four‐variable Screening Tool and Multivariate Apnea Index) and three physiological measures (capnography, nocturia, nocturnal oximetry). The instruments were used to predict SDB in patients after acute or subacute stroke. Either PSG or cardiorespiratory polygraphy was used as a standard to measure SDB.ResultsNo independent studies using the same questionnaires, methods or criteria were published reducing generalizability. Overall, the questionnaires were quite sensitive in finding SDB but not highly specific in identifying the non‐affected. The physiological measures (capnography) indicated promising results in predicting SDB, but capnography is not an ideal pre‐screening instrument as it requires a specialist to interpret the results.ConclusionsThe results of pre‐screening of SDB in acute and subacute stroke patients are promising but inconsistent. The current pre‐screening methods cannot readily be referred to clinicians in neurologic departments. Thus, it is necessary to conduct more research on developing novel pre‐screening methods for detecting SDB after stroke.
Tinnitus patients are prone to episodes of major depression and often also have obsessive-compulsive personality features. Psychiatric disorders seem to be comorbid or predisposing conditions rather than consequences of tinnitus. Clinical trial reference: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT 01929837).
Background and Aims: Presence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and especially obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for ischemic stroke. Additionally, SDB effects negatively on recovery after stroke. Up to one fourth of strokes are present on awakening. The link between OSA and wake-up stroke (WUS) has been suggested.We aim to determine the association between OSA and WUS in a Finnish stroke unit cohort. Material and Methods: An observational prospective longitudinal study consisted of 95 TIA (transient ischemic attack) and mild to moderate stroke patients referred to a Stroke Unit in Finland. Respiratory polygraphy was performed within 72 h of hospital admission. Patients were classified into WUS and non-WUS, and functional outcome measures (mRS, rehabilitation, hospitalization time) were collected. Functional outcomes and prevalence of OSA were compared between non-WUS and WUS.Results: OSA (AHI > 15/h) was more frequent among WUS than non-WUS (71% and 36%, respectively, p = 0.009). Functional outcome measured with mRS was worse in patients with WUS than non-WUS on registration day and at hospital discharge (p = 0.001). Need for rehabilitation in WUS was 43% of cases compared to 23% of non-WUS (p = 0.067). Hospitalization time was longer (5-15days) in 55% of WUS and 41% of non-WUS patients (p = 0.261). Conclusion:Moderate-to-severe OSA is related to WUS compared to non-WUS. In addition, WUS have worse short-term outcomes measured in mRS. Further studies are needed to determine if OSA is causally linked to WUS.
Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is frequent among ischemic stroke and TIA patients and several studies have estimated the prevalence between 50% and 70% depending on the definition (Bassetti &
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.