Patients recovering from cardiac surgery may benefit from music therapy.

Heart disease is the primary killer among American women. Differences in referral for cardiac rehabilitation, as well as compliance rates, have been reported between male and female cardiac patients. This study explored the use of Phase I and Phase II cardiac rehabilitation programs by male and female patients. In particular, the study aimed to investigate the relationship between eligibility and subsequent referral to Phase II cardiac rehabilitation in both men and women, as well as their compliance rates in completing Phase II. In addition, for those patients who never started a Phase II program, their reasons for nonparticipation were explored. Structured patient interviews and chart audits were used to explore cardiac rehabilitation eligibility criteria, referral and completion rates. The sample consisted of 87 patients (46 women and 41 men) who were admitted with a medical diagnosis of angina, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or valve replacement surgery. Men had higher eligibility rates for Phase I, whereas women had higher eligibility rates for Phase II; more men received a referral for Phase II from their physician than women did. Men had a higher completion rate with Phase II compared with women. For those patients who chose not to start a Phase II program, the most common reasons cited included transportation problems, insurance issues, and having exercise equipment at home. Although women are being referred for cardiac rehabilitation, fewer complete the programs. Continued education is essential to teach women the importance of cardiac rehabilitation to overall recovery and adaptation to an acute cardiac event. In addition, cardiac rehabilitation programs must be structured to meet the unique needs of women and thereby remove obstacles that have prevented higher participation rates by women in the past.

No abstract

No abstract

This articles describes the behavioral responses of adult family members to critical illness and how these responses change over the course of the hospitalization. A convenience sample of 52 family members of patients in intensive units completed the Iowa ICU Family Scale, a self-report tool measuring sleep, eating, activity, family role, and support behaviors. Scales were completed by family members each day during the first week and then weekly throughout the patient's ICU stay. Family members reported sleeping less with a poorer quality of sleep, less nutritional intake, an increased use of cigarettes, alcohol, and over-the-counter and prescription medications, and spending more time talking, visiting the patient, and waiting. Stress was highest at the time of the ICU admission, began to plateau at Day 6, and then dropped considerably by Day 28. These findings suggest that crisis intervention is important during the early phase of caring for critically ill patients and their family members.

Staffing was not a significant predictor of mortality or failure-to-rescue, nor did clinical specialty predict emotional exhaustion or job dissatisfaction. Although these findings reinforce adequate staffing ratios at this institution, programs that support nurses in their daily practice and positively impact job satisfaction need to be explored. The Nursing Research Council not only has heightened awareness of how staffing ratios affect patient and nurse outcomes, but also a broader understanding of how the research process can be used to effectively shape nurse's practice and work environments.

Presence of patients’ families during resuscitation has emerged as an important practice issue, sparking considerable controversy worldwide. Early advocates of allowing patients’ families to be present during resuscitation faced more resistance than did current advocates because the former had little or no scientific research results to support their ideas. In the past 15 years, a number of quantitative studies, especially descriptive surveys, have been conducted. Qualitative researchers have also explored the lived experience of family members present during resuscitation and less commonly the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers. In this review of the literature, the current state of the science is critically reviewed and the ethical-theoretical perspectives of respective researchers and staff participants in the reviewed studies are discussed. Surveys were used to collect data in most studies to date. Limitations of these designs include small convenience samples, low response rates, use of retrospective surveys and the associated potential selection bias, and lack of consistency in survey instruments, factors that make comparison of findings between studies difficult. Recommendations to address the gaps in the current state of knowledge about family members’ presence during resuscitation are discussed. Experimental and qualitative methods are especially needed to investigate the effect of family presence during resuscitation on patients, families, nurses and physicians, and other multidisciplinary staff members.

No abstract