FOXP2, the first gene causally linked to a human language disorder, is implicated in song acquisition, production and perception in oscine songbirds, the evolution of speech and language in hominids and the evolution of echolocation in bats. Despite the evident relevance of Foxp2 to vertebrate acoustic communication, a comprehensive description of neural expression patterns is currently lacking in mammals. Here we use immunocytochemistry to systematically describe the neural distribution of Foxp2 protein in four species of muroid rodents: Scotinomys teguina and S. xerampelinus (‘singing mice’), the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, and the lab mouse, Mus musculus. While expression patterns were generally highly conserved across brain regions, we identified subtle but consistent interspecific differences in Foxp2 distribution, most notably in the medial amygdala and nucleus accumbens, and in layer V cortex throughout the brain. Throughout the brain, Foxp2 was highly enriched in areas involved in modulation of fine motor output (striatum, mesolimbic dopamine circuit, olivocerebellar system), and in multimodal sensory processing and sensorimotor integration (thalamus, cortex). We propose a generalized model for Foxp2-modulated pathways in the adult brain including, but not limited to, fine motor production and auditory perception.
The distribution and anatomy of sirenian perioral bristles (modified vibrissae) and facial hairs are of interest because of their use during feeding and tactile exploration. In the present study we have identified six fields of perioral bristles on the face of the Florida manatee (T. manatus latirostris), four (U1‐U4) on each side of the upper lips and oral cavity, and two (L1‐L2) on each side of the lower lip pad, inside the oral cavity and rostral to the horny mandibular pad. Each field has a characteristic location, number of bristles, and range of bristle length and diameter. There is a mean of 110 (± 19) bristles per side, with no left‐right differences. Branches of the infraorbital nerve innervate the bases of the largest bristles (U2 group) on the upper bristle pad, and the inferior alveolar nerve supplies the bristles of the lower bristle pad. The dorsal and ventral buccal branches of the facial nerve innervate the superficial facial musculature, which is likely to be involved in bristle eversion and other movements which constitute feeding behavior. Hair is denser in the facial region than on the remainder of the body. Within the face, hair is denser on the oral disk than on the supradisk. The oral disk contains bristle‐like hair, whereas the supradisk region possesses hair that is similar in length and diameter to that on the postcranial body. The mean total of bristles and hairs per face was 1,942. Means for the subregions were 220 (± 39) bristles on the perioral bristle pads, 601 (± 115) bristlelike hairs in the oral disk region, 710 (± 229) typical hairs in the supradisk region, and 411 (± 108) typical hairs on the chin. There were no significant differences between left and right side counts. Facial hair density was inversely correlated with facial area and body size. These data provide new information on the anatomical basis of the exceptional orofacial activities characteristic of manatees during feeding and tactile exploration.
Sirenians, including Florida manatees, possess an array of hairs and bristles on the face. These are distributed in a pattern involving nine distinct regions of the face, unlike that of any other mammalian order. Some of these bristles and hairs are known to be used in tactile exploration and in grasping behaviors. In the present study we characterized the microanatomical structure of the hair and bristle follicles from the nine regions of the face. All follicles had the attributes of vibrissae, including a dense connective tissue capsule, prominent blood sinus complex, and substantial innervation. Each of the nine regions of the face exhibited a distinct combination of these morphological attributes, congruent with the previous designation of these regions based on location and external morphological criteria. The present data suggest that perioral bristles in manatees might have a tactile sensory role much like that of vibrissae in other mammals, in addition to their documented role in grasping of plants during feeding. Such a combination of motor and sensory usages would be unique to sirenians. Finally, we speculate that the facial hairs and bristles may play a role in hydrodynamic reception.
Previous reports have suggested that the sparsely distributed hairs found on the entire postcranial body of sirenians are all sinus type tactile hairs. This would represent a unique arrangement because no other mammal has been reported to possess tactile hairs except on restricted regions of the body, primarily the face. In order to investigate this issue further, hair counts were made systematically in three Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris), and hair follicle microanatomy was studied in 110 specimens gathered from 9 animals. We found that the postcranial body possesses approximately 1500 hairs per side, and hair density decreases from dorsal to ventral. External hair length ranged from 2–9 mm, and most hairs were separated from their nearest neighbor by 20–40 mm, resulting in an independent domain of movement for each hair. All hairs exhibited the anatomical characteristics of follicle-sinus complexes typical of tactile hairs, including a dense connective tissue capsule containing an elongated circumferential blood sinus and innervation by 20–50 axons which ascend the mesenchymal sheath. We conclude that this represents a unique distributed underwater tactile system capable of conveying detailed and significant external information concerning approaching animals, water currents and possibly the presence of large stationary features of the environment. Such a system would be analogous to the lateral line in fish, and would be particularly useful in the turbid habitat frequented by Florida manatees.
The effects of length of incubation and urine osmolality on the survival of feline mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas and representative gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in synthetic urine which approximated the osmolality of normal cat urine were investigated. Both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus withstood the effects of increasing osmotic pressure. In the most concentrated urine, significant decreases (P < 0.001) in CFU were observed for E. coli at exposure times of 30 min and longer. S. aureus was not affected by longer exposure or increased osmotic strength. Both Mycoplasma felis and Mycoplasma gateae were affected adversely by longer exposure times and high osmotic strength (P < 0.001). A Ureaplasma sp. was not adversely affected except at very high (.2,980 mosM) osmotic strengths or after prolonged incubation (120 min) at relatively high (1,976 mosM) osmotic strengths (P < 0.001). The failure of both M. felis and M. gateae to survive under osmotic conditions present in normal feline urine suggests that it is unlikely that these mycoplasmas are involved in urinary disorders in cats.
Serum (n = 1,636) and egg yolk (n = 802) samples collected from hens on four commercial egg farms in Florida were tested for the presence of specific antibodies to Mycoplasma gallisepticum in a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. No significant differences were noted between serum and egg yolk samples with respect to distribution of positive, suspect, and negative test results or for the mean sample/positive control ratio values of positive, suspect, and negative test results. A linear relationship between the distribution of positive and negative results and the age of the birds was observed for results obtained with both serum and egg yolk samples. On the basis of the results of this study, egg yolk samples can be used in lieu of serum samples to screen flocks for antibodies to Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.