Objective To determine the independent association between diabetes and SSI across multiple surgical procedures. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Studies indexed in PubMed published between December 1985 and through July 2015 were identified through the search terms “risk factors” or “glucose” and “surgical site infection”. A total of 3,631 abstracts were identified through the initial search terms. Full texts were reviewed for 522 articles. Of these, 94 articles met the criteria for inclusion. Standardized data collection forms were used to extract study-specific estimates for diabetes, blood glucose levels, and body mass index (BMI). Random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates and meta-regression was used to evaluate specific hypothesized sources of heterogeneity. Results The primary outcome was SSI, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance criteria. The overall effect size for the association between diabetes and SSI was OR=1.53 (95% Predictive Interval 1.11, 2.12, I2: 57.2%). SSI class, study design, or patient BMI did not significantly impact study results in a meta-regression model. The association was higher for cardiac surgery 2.03 (95% Predictive Interval 1.13, 4.05) compared to surgeries of other types (p=0.001). Conclusion These results support the consideration of diabetes as an independent risk factor for SSIs for multiple surgical procedure types. Continued efforts are needed to improve surgical outcomes for diabetic patients.

Objective:To characterize antifungal stewardship among antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) at a diverse range of hospitals and to correlate antifungal stewardship with hospital characteristics.Design:Cross-sectional survey.Participants:ASP physician and/or pharmacist members at Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network (SRN) hospitals.Methods:An electronic survey administered August–September 2018 via the SRN to 111 hospitals. The χ2 test was used to test associations between ASP and hospital characteristics and use of antifungal stewardship strategies.Results:Of 111 hospitals, 45 (41%) responded; most were academic medical centers (65%) caring for stem-cell patients (73.3%) and solid-organ transplant patients (80.0%). Most hospitals have large, well-established ASPs: 60% had >5 team members and 68.9% had a duration ≥6 years. In 43 hospitals (95.6%), ASPs used antifungal stewardship strategies, most commonly prospective audit and feedback (73.3%) by a pharmacist (71.4%). Half of ASPs (51.1%) created guidelines for invasive fungal infection (IFI) management. Most hospitals (71.1%) offered rapid laboratory tests to diagnose IFI, but polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and antifungal susceptibility testing varied. Also, 29 ASPs (64.4%) perform surveillance of antifungal utilization, but only 9 (31%) reported to the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network. ASP size, duration, and presence of transplant populations were not associated with a higher likelihood of using antifungal stewardship strategies (P > .05 for all).Conclusions:The use of antifungal stewardship strategies was high at SRN hospitals, but they mainly involved audit and feedback. ASPs should be encouraged (1) to disseminate guidelines for IFI management, (2) to promote access to laboratory tests for rapid and accurate IFI diagnosis, and (3) to perform surveillance for antifungal utilization with reporting to the CDC.

Background Infections caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms pose a unique challenge for infection control. The preferred agents for treatment of infections due to ESBL-producing bacteria are carbapenems. Data from prior studies suggest that hypoalbuminemia may have a profound effect on the pharmacodynamic properties of ertapenem. Our hypothesis is that ertapenem usage in patients with hypoalbuminemia will lead to negative clinical outcomes such as infection recurrence, hospital readmission, and mortality when compared to subjects with higher albumin levels. Methods This was a retrospective, observational, single-centered, cohort study of hospitalized patients at Loyola University Medical Center between January 2010 and August 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups to include those who received ertapenem with serum albumin >2.5 g/dL and those who received ertapenem with serum albumin < 2.5 g/dL. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day all-cause mortality. Baseline characteristics that were collected included age, sex, nutrition status, patient comorbidities. Data regarding predictors of mortality within 24 hours of initiation of ertapenem including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was also collected. Study Criteria Results Of the 146 subjects that were included, 73 patients had serum albumin levels of < 2.5 g/dL during treatment with ertapenem. 30 day all-cause mortality was 19.7% for subjects with low albumin and 9.6% for subjects with normal albumin levels (p=0.09). Our study found that although not statistically significant, there is potentially a clinical significance between hypoalbuminemia and our primary endpoint, 30-day all-cause mortality, with higher rates of mortality in the low albumin group and a 9.6% between group difference. This data suggests that in subjects with hypoalbuminemia, treatment with once-daily ertapenem may lead to suboptimal outcomes regarding patient mortality. Outcome Data Conclusion The present study data suggests that in subjects with hypoalbuminemia, treatment with ertapenem dosed as a once-daily intravenous infusion may be associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes that may include an increased mortality, hospital readmission, and length of stay. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Pneumonia is common in the intensive care unit (ICU), infecting 27% of all critically ill patients. Given the high prevalence of this disease state in the ICU, optimizing antimicrobial therapy while minimizing toxicities is of utmost importance. Inappropriate antimicrobial use can increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance, Clostridiodes difficile infection, allergic reaction, and other complications from antimicrobial use (e.g., QTc prolongation, thrombocytopenia). This review article aims to discuss methods to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients with pneumonia, including the following: procalcitonin use, utilization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nares testing to determine need for vancomycin therapy, utilization of the Biofire® FilmArray® pneumonia polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and microbiology reporting techniques.

Background Infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens are particularly deadly and difficult to treat in immunocompromised patients, where few data exist to guide optimal antimicrobial therapy. In the absence of adequate clinical data, in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses can help to design treatment regimens that are bactericidal and may be clinically effective. Methods We report a case in which in vitro pharmacodynamic analyses were utilized to guide the treatment of complex, recurrent bacteremias due to vancomycin-, daptomycin-, and linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex in a liver transplant patient. Results Whole-genome sequencing revealed unique underlying resistance mechanisms and explained the rapid evolution of phenotypic resistance and complicated intrahost genomic dynamics observed in vivo. Performing this comprehensive genotypic and phenotypic testing and time-kill analyses, along with knowledge of institution and patient-specific factors, allowed us to use precision medicine to design a treatment regimen that maximized PK/PD. Conclusions This work provides a motivating example of clinicians and scientists uniting to optimize care in the era of escalating antimicrobial resistance.

Antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) is becoming an increasingly high priority worldwide, yet the emergency department (ED) is an area where stewardship is often neglected. Implementing care bundles, guidelines, and protocols appears to be a rational strategy for ED stewardship given the inherently dynamic and hectic environment of care. Multiple questions still exist such as whether to target certain disease states, optimal implementation of ASP interventions in the ED, and the benefit of unique ED-specific guidelines and protocols. A narrative review was performed on interventions, guidelines, and bundles implemented in the ED setting, in an effort to improve ASP or management of infectious diseases. This review is meant to serve as a framework for the reader to implement these practices at their own institution. We examined various studies related to ASP interventions or care bundles in the ED which included: CNS infections (one study), skin and soft-tissue infections (one study), respiratory infections (four studies), urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted infections (eight studies), sepsis (two studies), culture follow-up programs (four studies), and stewardship in general or multiple infection types (five studies). The interventions in this review were diverse, yet the majority showed a benefit in clinical outcomes or a decrease in antimicrobial use. Care bundles, guidelines, and antimicrobial stewardship interventions can streamline care and improve the management of common infectious diseases seen in the ED.

Objectives:The compatibility of vancomycin with existing and novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors at clinically relevant concentrations in 5% dextrose in water has not been fully explored to date. Methods: Vancomycin concentrations tested ranged from 5 to 20 mg/mL. Ceftazidime-avibactam was tested at 8, 20, and 40 mg/mL, ceftolozane-tazobactam at 15 mg/mL, and piperacillin-tazobactam at 28 mg/mL. Compatibility of drug admixtures were tested via both simulated and actual y-site infusion. For the simulated y-site compatibility assessment, 1:1 mixtures of each respective drug were analyzed over 24 hours. Actual y-site infusion followed a 4-hour extended-infusion protocol, with aliquots tested hourly for 4 hours. At all time points, the compatibility of each admixture was determined using 6 different methods: visual, microscopic, Tyndall beam, nephelometric, pH, and microbiologic bioassay assessment. If any admixture failed any one of these 6 assays, it was considered incompatible. Any combination deemed incompatible was filtered through a 0.22 µm filter and reanalyzed to assess impact of particle size. Results: There were no differences in compatibility categorizations between simulated and actual y-site infusion. There were no changes in compatibility over the time course of any experiment. Ceftazidime-avibactam at 8 mg/mL was incompatible with vancomycin at 5 mg/mL. The maximum compatible vancomycin concentrations were 5 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL with 20 and 40 mg/ mL of ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. Ceftolozane-tazobactam 15 mg/mL was compatible with vancomycin concentrations up to 10 mg/mL. The maximum compatible vancomycin concentration with piperacillin-tazobactam 28 mg/mL was 5 mg/mL. None of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors tested were compatible with 15 or 20 mg/mL of vancomycin. None of the admixtures considered incompatible by other methods displayed any decrease in antimicrobial activity as assessed by bioassay. After filtration, all admixtures originally deemed incompatible maintained their visual turbidity and microscopic particulate matter. Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam prepared at the lowest concentration recommended in the package insert is incompatible with vancomycin. Ceftolozane-tazobactam did not display incompatibility until vancomycin concentrations above 10 mg/mL were tested. Piperacillin-tazobactam at a typical extended-infusion concentration is compatible with vancomycin in D5W. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess compatibility of antibiotic admixtures via direct measurement of antimicrobial activity. The lack of any decrement in antibacterial activity of any apparently incompatible admixture and maintenance of incompatibility after passage through a 0.22 µm filter may suggest a lack of clinically relevant adverse effects when co-administered. Future compatibility studies should incorporate appropriate methods to accurately assess both efficacy and safety of co-administered drug products.

No abstract