2015
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic and clinical considerations for monitoring asparaginase activity levels during pegaspargase therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, with the vast majority of pediatric ALL patients treated on national clinical trial protocols, data on adverse effects related to PEG‐ASP from large multicenter clinical trials should be collated to determine if increased monitoring, VTE prophylaxis, or dose capping at 3,750 IU should be incorporated into these national protocols. Furthermore, recent data published on the use of asparaginase activity levels for therapeutic drug monitoring and PEG‐ASP dose adjustments suggest that incorporation of asparaginase activity levels into upcoming treatment protocols might be one strategy available for reducing PEG‐ASP dose‐related toxicities in the future …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, with the vast majority of pediatric ALL patients treated on national clinical trial protocols, data on adverse effects related to PEG‐ASP from large multicenter clinical trials should be collated to determine if increased monitoring, VTE prophylaxis, or dose capping at 3,750 IU should be incorporated into these national protocols. Furthermore, recent data published on the use of asparaginase activity levels for therapeutic drug monitoring and PEG‐ASP dose adjustments suggest that incorporation of asparaginase activity levels into upcoming treatment protocols might be one strategy available for reducing PEG‐ASP dose‐related toxicities in the future …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Recently, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines and other expert reviews on ASNase hypersensitivity recommended switching of ASNase preparations only in the event of grade ≥ 3, severe or lifethreatening allergic or anaphylactic reactions. 36,[41][42][43] In addition, due to the repeated shortage of Erwinia ASNase various strategies were evaluated in order to avoid or delay the switch to Erwinia ASNase as long as possible. 36,44,45 Thus, PEG-ASNase was either generally administered under premedication or in case of hypersensitivity reactions grade ≤ 2 under premedication at initially reduced infusion rates.…”
Section: Symptoms Of Moderate Hypersensitivity Reactions (Ctcae Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the benefits of asparaginase activity monitoring are generally acknowledged, the optimal asparaginase activity level and appropriate use of monitoring in clinical practice remains the subject of debate [28,68,82,83]. There are two primary ways that asparaginase activity monitoring can be utilized in practice: (1) to identify patients with silent inactivation, and (2) to incrementally adjust asparaginase doses in individual patients to achieve 'optimal' asparaginase activity.…”
Section: Recommendations For Asparaginase Activity Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%