The aim of the study was to obtain calibration curves for a pair of size exclusion chromatography (SEC) columns operating with 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) as eluent. The dependence of the calibrations on sample chemical structures has been examined. The calibrations have been compared with elution times of several sets of standards. The level of agreement between SEC and MALDI-mass spectrometry has been evaluated. Molecular mass distributions of several complex samples have been examined in terms of these calibrations. The polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) calibration curves were close, while a set of polysaccharides (PSAC) and other oxygenates eluted much earlier. However, numerous other samples eluted closer to the PS-PMMA line. To a first approximation, deviations between the PSAC and PS-PMMA lines may be treated as an upper limit to errors arising from structure-dependent variations in this SEC system. Below 15 000 u, MMs of oxygenated samples could be estimated to within a factor of ∼2-2.5. Other structural features gave rise to smaller deviations. Good agreement was observed up to about m/z 3000, between SEC and MALDI and LD-MS. The techniques are independent, suggesting that up to this limit, SEC may be considered as a quantitative tool. The accuracy of the measurement is subject to greater uncertainty with increasing molecular mass. The often-made assumption that high-mass materials are composed of aggregates has been examined. Furthermore, evidence from several analytical techniques provides indications of entirely different structural makeup (e.g., nature of fragments in mass spectrometry; trace element concentration) between fractions with different apparent molecular massessas determined by SEC. It is possible that some molecules adopt 3-dimensional conformations and show up as larger than they really are. While the "aggregates" assumption did not explain our experimental observations, structures of material appearing under the excluded peak in SEC require further careful study.
Laser-desorption mass spectrometry (LD-MS) method development was undertaken to improve estimates of mass ranges for complex hydrocarbon mixtures. A creosote oil, an anthracene oil, and a mixture of known polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds were examined. The data on the mixture of the four PAHs made it possible to define LD-MS conditions necessary to generate artifacts such as cluster ions by the combination of high laser power and high-mass accelerator voltage. The formation of cluster ions was possible without overloading the detector system. These multimer ions overlapped with higher-mass ion signals from the sample. However, careful balancing of sample concentration, laser power, total ion current, and delayed ion extraction appears to show high-mass materials without generating high-mass multimer (artifact) ions. It is possible to suppress the formation of cluster ions by keeping low target concentrations and, consequently, low gas phase concentrations formed by the laser pulse. The principal method used in this work was the fractionation of samples by planar chromatography followed by successive LD-MS analysis of the separated fractions directly from the chromatographic plates. This method separated the more abundant small molecules from the less abundant large molecules to permit the generation of their mass spectra independently, as well as reducing the concentration of sample by spreading over the PC-plate. The technique demonstrably suppressed multimer formation and greatly improved the reproducibility of the spectra. Results showed the presence of molecule ions in the ranges m/z 1000−2000 for the anthracene oil sample and m/z 600−1500 for the creosote oil sample, tailing off to m/z ∼5,000. The creosote oil contained significantly less of this high-mass material than the anthracene oil sample, and in both cases, high-mass material was only present in low quantities. Ion mass range estimates were in close agreement with molecular mass ranges from size exclusion chromatography, and findings were consistent with changes observed in the UV-fluorescence spectra. The method outlined in the paper appears directly applicable to the characterization of heavier coal and petroleum derived fractions.
This work compares UV-fluorescence (UV-F) and UV-absorption (UV-A) as detection methods
in the analysis of coal and petroleum-derived materials, using size exclusion chromatography
(SEC). A UV-F spectrometer that was equipped with a flow cell was connected in series to an
SEC chromatograph with a conventional UV-A detector. Samples were examined via SEC, using
both UV-F and UV-A detectors that were operating in tandem. They included asphaltenes from
heavy petroleum residues and three fractions of a coal tar pitch obtained by solvent solubility
separation. The chromatogram of the lightest fraction of the coal tar pitch (the acetone solubles)
showed a single peak, with close agreement between both detection systems. The rest of the
samples showed an early-eluting peak that corresponded to material excluded from the column
porosity, in addition to a retained peak. UV-F showed little sensitivity to material eluting under
the excluded peak in any of the samples and also was less effective than UV-A in detecting the
material eluting at shorter times under the retained peak, only responding to the smallest
molecules. Number and weight averages of the molecular mass distributions calculated for the
retained material from UV-A were significantly higher than those calculated from UV-F data.
UV-F fails to detect the entire range of compounds present in these complex samples, and it is
particularly insensitive to the heavier ends. It seems that detection by UV-F is more dependent
on structural features than UV-A.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.