2004
DOI: 10.1021/ef049885g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Limitations of UV−Fluorescence Spectroscopy in the Detection of High-Mass Hydrocarbon Molecules

Abstract: This work compares UV-fluorescence (UV-F) and UV-absorption (UV-A) as detection methods in the analysis of coal and petroleum-derived materials, using size exclusion chromatography (SEC). A UV-F spectrometer that was equipped with a flow cell was connected in series to an SEC chromatograph with a conventional UV-A detector. Samples were examined via SEC, using both UV-F and UV-A detectors that were operating in tandem. They included asphaltenes from heavy petroleum residues and three fractions of a coal tar pi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
90
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 does not show this effect since the spectra have been height-normalized to emphasize the relative positions of the peaks. We have shown elsewhere 16 that typically only the fluorescence from molecules below 3000 g mole À1 can be detected. Fluorescence from earlier eluting molecules was too low to be detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…2 does not show this effect since the spectra have been height-normalized to emphasize the relative positions of the peaks. We have shown elsewhere 16 that typically only the fluorescence from molecules below 3000 g mole À1 can be detected. Fluorescence from earlier eluting molecules was too low to be detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…All LDI results that do not account for these experimental factors are likely invalid (Mullins et al in process). Gas-phase aggregation in LDI can cause misinterpreted data to yield apparent huge asphaltene molecular weights (Trevor et al 2005;Herod et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is clear is that polystyrene, which is commonly used as an SEC standard, has very different adherence properties than asphaltenes and is not a suitable standard. Certain SEC experiments obtain giant molecular masses for asphaltenes (megaDalton) (Trevor et al 2005;Herod et al 2007) and employ eluting solvents such as N-methyl pyrrolidinone, which flocculate up to ½ the asphaltene sample (Mullins et al in process). The giant asphaltene molecules are likely the expected asphaltene flocs (Mullins et al in process).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different authors have suggested models with one or the other being predominant for different asphaltene samples (e.g., refs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] favour the archipelago architecture and [26][27][28][29][30][31] favour the continental) or asphaltene fractions [32], notwithstanding that the reliability of some common experimental methods may be a matter of concern [33][34][35]. A predominant molecular structure for asphaltenes supporting the continental archetype has been identified in the Yen-Mullins model [36][37][38] (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%