States indicated lower risk estimates than the com-Objective-To study cause specific mortality mission recommends, and when the American data of radiation workers with particular reference to are combined with our analysis the overall risks are associations between fatal neoplasms and level of close to those estimated by the commission. This exposure to radiation. first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Design-Cohort study. Workers does not provide sufficient evidence to Setting-United Kingdom. justify a revision in risk estimates for radiological Subjects-95 217 radiation workers at major sites protection purposes. of the nuclear industry. Main outcome measure-Cause of death. Results-Most standardised mortality ratios were Introduction below 100: 83 unlagged, 85 with a 10 year lag for ali Estimates of the risks of ionising radiation rest causes; 84 unlagged, 86 lagged for all cancers; and 80 mainly on evidence from Japanese atomic bomb for all known other causes, indicating a "healthy survivors and from people exposed for medical reasons. worker effect." The deficit of lung cancer (75 These groups provide information on risks from unlagged, 76 lagged) was significant at the 0-1% exposure to high doses at high dose rates. There is little level. Standardised mortality ratios were signifi-direct evidence of the effects of lower doses and dose cantly raised (214 unlagged, 303 lagged) for thyroid rates typical of occupational exposures. To provide cancer, but there was no evidence for any trend with such direct evidence the National Radiological Protecexternal recorded radiation dose. Dose of external tion Board, after extensive consultation with the radiation and mortality from ali cancers were weakly nuclear industry and other interested groups, set up correlated (p= 010), and multiple myeloma was the National Registry for Radiation Workers in 1976 as more strongly correlated (p=0.06); for leukaemia, the national study of radiation workers, following National Radiological excluding chronic lymphatic, the trend was signifi-individuals through different employments.' Protection Board, Chilton, cant (p=0-03; all tests one tailed). The central The first analysis of the registry covers over 95000 Didcot OXII ORQ estimates of lifetime risk derived from these data radiation workers whose collective dose from external were 10-0% per Sv (90% confidence interval <0 to radiation is about 3200 man Sv. The essentials of the GM Kendall,PHD, principal 24%) for all cancers and 0-76% per Sv (0-07 to 24%) for study are described in this paper; more details can be scientific officer leukaemia (excluding chronic lymphatic leukaemia). found in a separate report.2 C R Muirhead, PHD, These are, respectively, 2-5 times and 1-9 times the BMJlf 1992;304:220-5 combined cohorts of radiation workers in the United (a) and (d) from
The authors examined the moderating role of positive and negative religious coping in the relation between racism and psychological well-being in a sample of Catholic and Protestant Asian American college students (N = 107). On the basis of prior theorizing on the 2 types of religious coping, combined with some limited empirical evidence, they predicted that positive religious coping would have a buffering effect (Hypothesis 1) on the racism-mental health relation and that negative religious coping would have an exacerbating effect (Hypothesis 2). Participants completed an online survey containing measures corresponding to the study variables. Results indicated that the interaction between positive religious coping and racism was nonsignificant, so Hypothesis 1 was not supported. For Hypothesis 2, the negative religious coping and racism interaction term was statistically significant, but the moderating effect was in an unexpected direction, such that negative religious coping actually protected against the deleterious impact of racism on mental health. The findings suggest that the theorized deleterious influence of negative religious coping may need to be reconsidered in an Asian American setting. The findings have the potential to inform practitioners who work with Asian American college students to better cope with the detrimental consequences of racism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.