Our purpose was to investigate the prognostic impact of overweight/obesity in 5‐year event‐free survival (EFS) in a cohort of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We retrospectively analyzed 181 newly diagnosed ALL children enrolled between 1990 and 2009 and treated with Berlin‐Frankfurt‐Munich (BFM) protocols. The majority of children in our cohort were <10 years‐old. Our data clearly indicated that overweight/obesity is an independent predictor of relapse risk, mainly in the intermediate‐ and high‐risk groups (HR) of children. These results could be explained by changes in the chemotherapy pharmacokinetics in overweight/obese patients and by the antiapoptotic effects in leukemic cells caused by adipocytes.
BackgroundThere is growing concern about the economic impact of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in Brazil and worldwide.ObjectiveTo estimate the economic impact of CVD in Brazil in the last five years.MethodsThe information to estimate CVD costs was taken from national databases, adding the direct costs with hospitalizations, outpatient visits and benefits granted by social security. Indirect costs were added to the calculation, such as loss of income caused by CVD morbidity or mortality.ResultsCVD mortality accounts for 28% of all deaths in Brazil in the last five years and for 38% of deaths in the productive age range (18 to 65 years). The estimated costs of CVD were R$ 37.1 billion in 2015, a 17% increase in the period from 2010 to 2015. The estimated costs of premature death due to CVD represent 61% of the total cost of CVD, Direct costs with hospitalizations and consultations were 22%, and costs related to the loss of productivity related to the disease were 15% of the total. Health expenditures in Brazil are estimated at 9.5% of GDP and the average cost of CVD was estimated at 0.7% of GDP.ConclusionCVD costs have increased significantly in the last five years. It is estimated that CVD costs increase as the Brazilian population ages and the prevalence of CVD increases.
In this JSLE population, the SLICC criteria performed best in terms of sensitivity and accuracy at the first visit and within the first year of follow-up.
Recurrent haemarthroses leading to chronic synovitis and arthropathy remain a major cause of morbidity in patients with haemophilia. Radioactive synovectomy (RS) is considered the first choice of treatment for chronic haemophilic synovitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of RS with Yttrium(90) citrate (C-Y(90)) in the joints of patients with chronic haemophilic synovitis. From 2003 to 2007, 245 joints (118 knees, 76 elbows, 49 ankles and two shoulders) of 190 patients with haemophilia or von Willebrand disease were submitted to RS with C-Y(90) at Hemocentro de Mato Grosso, Brazil. Forty joints had radiographic Pettersson scores above 8. There were 36 joints of 22 patients with inhibitors to factor VIII. The procedure was safe with low occurrence of adverse events. The main effect was the overall reduction in joint bleeding frequency, from 19.8 to 2.6 per year post-RS. Similar results were obtained in cases with high radiographic scores and in inhibitor patients. Pain reduction was observed in most cases. Average range of motion was maintained or increased 1 year post-RS in most joints. Extension was stable or increased in 88.2% of the knees and 86.5% of the elbows. Ankle plantarflexion was stable or increased in 90.9%, whereas dorsiflexion was maintained or increased in 87.9%. Worsening of the range of motion, when present, ranged from 14 to 17 degrees. We concluded that RS with C-Y(90) represents an important resource for the treatment of chronic haemophilic synovitis, markedly reducing joint bleeding frequency and pain, irrespective of the radiographic stage and inhibitor status.
Pediatric cancer is a relatively rare and heterogeneous group of hematological and non-hematological malignancies which require multiple procedures for its diagnostic screening and classification. Until now, flow cytometry (FC) has not been systematically applied to the diagnostic work-up of such malignancies, particularly for solid tumors. Here we evaluated a FC panel of markers for the diagnostic screening of pediatric cancer and further classification of pediatric solid tumors. The proposed strategy aims at the differential diagnosis between tumoral vs. reactive samples, and hematological vs. non-hematological malignancies, and the subclassification of solid tumors. In total, 52 samples from 40 patients suspicious of containing tumor cells were analyzed by FC in parallel to conventional diagnostic procedures. The overall concordance rate between both approaches was of 96% (50/52 diagnostic samples), with 100% agreement for all reactive/inflammatory and non-infiltrated samples as well as for those corresponding to solid tumors (n = 35), with only two false negative cases diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic lymphoma, respectively. Moreover, clear discrimination between samples infiltrated by hematopoietic vs. non-hematopoietic tumor cells was systematically achieved. Distinct subtypes of solid tumors showed different protein expression profiles, allowing for the differential diagnosis of neuroblastoma (CD56hi/GD2+/CD81hi), primitive neuroectodermal tumors (CD271hi/CD99+), Wilms tumors (>1 cell population), rhabdomyosarcoma (nuMYOD1+/numyogenin+), carcinomas (CD45−/EpCAM+), germ cell tumors (CD56+/CD45−/NG2+/CD10+) and eventually also hemangiopericytomas (CD45−/CD34+). In summary, our results show that multiparameter FC provides fast and useful complementary data to routine histopathology for the diagnostic screening and classification of pediatric cancer.
The expression of CD10 in the low-risk IPI group, and the expression of Bcl-2 in the high-risk IPI group can identify two subgroups of patients who might benefit from new risk-adaptive treatment approaches.
Background: To date there are no specific classification criteria for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). This study aims to compare the performance among the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria (SLICC) and the new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR criteria, in a cSLE cohort. Methods: We conducted a medical chart review study of cSLE cases and controls with defined rheumatic diseases, both ANA positive, to establish each ACR1997, SLICC and EULAR/ACR criterion fulfilled, at first visit and 1-yearfollow-up. Results: Study population included 122 cSLE cases and 89 controls. At first visit, SLICC criteria had higher sensitivity than ACR 1997 (89.3% versus 70.5%, p < 0.001), but similar specificity (80.9% versus 83.2%, p = 0.791), however performance was not statistically different at 1-year-follow-up. SLICC better scored in specificity compared to EULAR/ACR score ≥ 10 at first visit (80.9% versus 67.4%, p = 0.008) and at 1-year (76.4% versus 58.4%, p = 0.001), although sensitivities were similar. EULAR/ACR criteria score ≥ 10 exhibited higher sensitivity than ACR 1997 (87.7% versus 70.5%, p < 0.001) at first visit, but comparable at 1-year, whereas specificity was lower at first visit (67.4% versus 83.2%, p = 0.004) and 1-year (58.4% versus 76.4%, p = 0.002). A EULAR/ACR score ≥ 13 against a score ≥ 10, resulted in higher specificity, positive predictive value, and cutoff point accuracy. Compared to SLICC, a EULAR/ACR score ≥ 13 resulted in lower sensitivity at first visit (76.2% versus 89.3%, p < 0.001) and 1-year (91% versus 97.5%, p = 0.008), but similar specificities at both assessments. When compared to ACR 1997, a EULAR/ACR total score ≥ 13, resulted in no differences in sensitivity and specificity at both observation periods. Conclusions: In this cSLE population, SLICC criteria better scored at first visit and 1-year-follow-up. The adoption of a EULAR/ACR total score ≥ 13 in this study, against the initially proposed ≥10 score, was most appropriate to classify cSLE. Further studies are necessary to address if SLICC criteria might allow fulfillment of cSLE classification earlier in disease course and may be more inclusive of cSLE subjects for clinical studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.