Urban technological innovation—the innovative use of technologies to tackle urban problems—has become increasingly popular under the label smart city. Our understanding of this sociotechnical process is limited, and therefore, this article develops a framework on the basis of the literature on social and technological innovation. This framework identifies four perspectives—a technological, an instrumental, a collaborative, and a symbolic perspective—to generate a comprehensive account of urban technological innovation. The value of the framework is tested by using it to analyze the Living Lab Stratumseind in Eindhoven (the Netherlands). The case highlights the value of the framework and demonstrates the interactions between the social and technological dimensions. The case study suggests that, for successful urban technological innovation, it is crucial to link initial enthusiasm based on technological and symbolic value to the long-term dynamics of institutionalized collaboration and instrumental value.
In this paper the relation between ICT-innovations and the culture of public administration is explored. Recent research shows that, regarding these kinds of innovations, there often is a one-sided focus on efficiency and customer orientation and a dominant belief in ICT as a neutral instrument in the hands of government. One of the consequences is an underestimation of the role of organizational culture when it comes to ICT-driven innovations. If we look at the conditions for innovations in literature, we can conclude that for most public organizations it is hard, if not impossible, to meet them. Many barriers can be identified that hinder innovation in practice. Often these barriers have to do with the specific bureaucratic culture of government organizations. But times are changing. The role of government shifts from hierarchical, top down steering and self-producing to facilitating and being a coproductive and problem-oriented partner in the networks of today's society. This also brings about a need for a more innovative climate within the public sector. Besides looking differently at things (people, organization and implementation), it is also needed to really accept the consequences of the shift from policy to problem orientation. Different possibilities are explored that might contribute to establish a more innovative culture within public administration. These range from instruments for stimulating creativity in organizations, to changing the innovation paradigm within government. Central in the 'new' paradigm is the idea that a more collaborative way of innovating is needed. Not just within government but also between the public and private sector. Although the idea seems promising, it should be realized that the shift in innovation paradigm within government will of course not be an easy one. Many practical and more fundamental issues need to be addressed. Therefore, the paper concludes with describing the contours of an alternative innovation strategy that can be used by government organizations as a first step on their way to change their innovation paradigm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.