No abstract

No abstract

The assessment of intraoperative CT-based imaging presents multiple benefits over alternative safety mechanisms including early detection and applicability even in cases of malformation of the mastoid. This work presents a computer-assisted approach to image analysis that enables procedure safety measurements to be reliably performed with superior accuracy to other proposed safety methodologies, at a safe distance from the facial nerve. Its application must, however, be considered in relation to associated costs (time, cost, irradiation) and the dependence of the measure on a reliable preoperative segmentation.

We present an ultrasound-driven 4D magnetic resonance imaging (US-4DMRI) method for respiratory motion imaging in the thorax and abdomen. The proposed US-4DMRI comes along with a high temporal resolution, and allows for organ motion imaging beyond a single respiratory cycle. With the availability of the US surrogate both inside and outside the MR bore, 4D MR images can be reconstructed for 4D treatment planning and online respiratory motion prediction during radiotherapy. US-4DMRI relies on simultaneously acquired 2D liver US images and abdominal 2D MR multi-slice scans under free respiration. MR volumes are retrospectively composed by grouping the MR slices corresponding to the most similar US images. We present two different US similarity metrics: an intensity-based approach, and a similarity measure relying on predefined fiducials which are being tracked over time. The proposed method is demonstrated on MR liver scans of eight volunteers acquired over a duration of 5.5 min each at a temporal resolution of 2.6 Hz with synchronous US imaging at 14 Hz-17 Hz. Visual inspection of the reconstructed MR volumes revealed satisfactory results in terms of continuity in organ boundaries and blood vessels. In quantitative leave-one-out experiments, both US similarity metrics reach the performance level of state-of-the-art navigator-based approaches.

Metastatic spine disease is incurable, causing increased vertebral fracture risk and severe patient morbidity. Here, we demonstrate that osteolytic, osteosclerotic, and mixed bone metastasis uniquely modify human vertebral bone architecture and quality, affecting vertebral strength and stiffness. Multivariable analysis showed bone metastasis type dominates vertebral strength and stiffness changes, with neither age nor gender having an independent effect. In osteolytic vertebrae, bone architecture rarefaction, lower tissue mineral content and connectivity, and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) affected low vertebral strength and stiffness. In osteosclerotic vertebrae, high trabecular number and thickness but low AGEs, suggesting a high degree of bone remodeling, yielded high vertebral strength. Our study found that bone metastasis from prostate and breast primary cancers differentially impacted the osteosclerotic bone microenvironment, yielding altered bone architecture and accumulation of AGEs. These findings indicate that therapeutic approaches should target the restoration of bone structural integrity.

Finite element (FE) models can unravel the link between intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and its mechanical behaviour. Nucleotomy may provide the data required for model verification. Three human IVDs were scanned with MRI and tested in multiple loading scenarios, prior and post nucleotomy. The resulting data was used to generate, calibrate, and verify the FE models. Nucleotomy increased the experimental range of motion by 26%, a result reproduced by the FE simulation within a 5% error. This work demonstrates the ability of FE models to reproduce the mechanical compliance of human IVDs prior and post nucleotomy.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the ability of 1) CT-derived bone lesion quality (classification of vertebral bone metastases [BM]) and 2) computed CT-measured volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) for evaluating the strength and stiffness of cadaver vertebrae from donors with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS Forty-five thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were obtained from cadaver spines of 11 donors with breast, esophageal, kidney, lung, or prostate cancer. Each vertebra was imaged using microCT (21.4 μm), vBMD, and bone volume to total volume were computed, and compressive strength and stiffness experimentally measured. The microCT images were reconstructed at 1-mm voxel size to simulate axial and sagittal clinical CT images. Five expert clinicians blindly classified the images according to bone lesion quality (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed, or healthy). Fleiss’ kappa test was used to test agreement among 5 clinical raters for classifying bone lesion quality. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to test the difference in vertebral strength and stiffness based on bone lesion quality. Multivariable regression analysis was used to test the independent contribution of bone lesion quality, computed vBMD, age, gender, and race for predicting vertebral strength and stiffness. RESULTS A low interrater agreement was found for bone lesion quality (κ = 0.19). Although the osteoblastic vertebrae showed significantly higher strength than osteolytic vertebrae (p = 0.0148), the multivariable analysis showed that bone lesion quality explained 19% of the variability in vertebral strength and 13% in vertebral stiffness. The computed vBMD explained 75% of vertebral strength (p < 0.0001) and 48% of stiffness (p < 0.0001) variability. The type of BM affected vBMD-based estimates of vertebral strength, explaining 75% of strength variability in osteoblastic vertebrae (R2 = 0.75, p < 0.0001) but only 41% in vertebrae with mixed bone metastasis (R2 = 0.41, p = 0.0168), and 39% in osteolytic vertebrae (R2 = 0.39, p = 0.0381). For vertebral stiffness, vBMD was only associated with that of osteoblastic vertebrae (R2 = 0.44, p = 0.0024). Age and race inconsistently affected the model’s strength and stiffness predictions. CONCLUSIONS Pathologic vertebral fracture occurs when the metastatic lesion degrades vertebral strength, rendering it unable to carry daily loads. This study demonstrated the limitation of qualitative clinical classification of bone lesion quality for predicting pathologic vertebral strength and stiffness. Computed CT-derived vBMD more reliably estimated vertebral strength and stiffness. Replacing the qualitative clinical classification with computed vBMD estimates may improve the prediction of vertebral fracture risk.