No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Detailed analysis of the morphology of Florisphaera profunda from plankton samples collected at three sites in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans reveals wide variation in this deep ocean-dwelling coccolithophore. In addition to the two varieties described previously, we found a third distinctive form, Florisphaera profunda var. rhinocera var. nov. All three varieties occur at each of the sampling sites. The analysis of monthly samples from different levels in the lower photic zone (LPZ) (100-200 m) at the Hawaii Ocean Time series station suggests that the varieties have similar distributions, which are correlated to primary productivity and the availability of light. The analysis of coccolith and coccosphere size in F. profunda reveals the existence of several size modes in Florisphaera profunda var. profunda and F. profunda var. elongata. The biological significance of these modes, or morphotypes is not known. However, their co-occurrence in single samples from different oceanic areas suggests that they are not ecophenotypes. In the light of recent molecular genetic analyses of intraspecific groups within commonly occurring coccolithophores, the varieties and size morphotypes of F. profunda are of significant interest for the study of marine phytoplankton biodiversity. Coccolithophores inhabiting the LPZ may be adapted to the low light, high nutrient conditions of this layer and hold great potential as a means to reconstruct past oceanographic conditions such as the position of the nutricline. However, coccolithophore biodiversity in the LPZ is poorly documented and the number of species may be much higher than previously thought.

A quick new method is described for the quantification of absolute nannofossil proportions in deep-sea sediments. This method (SMS) is the combination of Spiking a sample with Microbeads and Spraying it on a cover slide. It is suitable for scanning electron microscope (SEM) analyses and for light microscope (LM) analyses. Repeated preparation and counting of the same sample (30 times) revealed a standard deviation of š10.5%. The application of tracer microbeads with different diameters and densities revealed no statistically significant differences between counts. The SMS-method yielded coccolith numbers that are statistically not significantly different from values obtained from the filtration-method. However, coccolith counts obtained by the random settling method are three times higher than the values obtained by the SMS-and the filtration-method.

No abstract