Thirty cadaveric forearms were tested using a wrist testing apparatus specifically designed to investigate the mechanisms of muscle stabilization of the wrist. The specimens were set in a jig allowing the distal row to migrate proximally and to rotate around the pronosupination forearm axis. Five wrist motor tendons (FCR, FCU, ECU, ECRL and APL) were loaded with specific weights. Reactive rotations of the scaphoid, triquetrum and capitate were measured by an electromagnetic motion tracking device. When all five tendons were loaded simultaneously, the capitate supinated and the proximal row predominantly supinated and flexed. By contrast, when the ECU was loaded in isolation, it caused pronation to both proximal and distal rows. The FCR exhibited a mixed effect pronating the capitate and triquetrum, whilst supinating the scaphoid. Based on this, a hypothesis is proposed linking wrist stability to the balance of wrist pronators (ECU and FCR) and supinators (FCU, ECRL and APL).
Ten cadaveric forearms were tested using a wrist testing apparatus specifically designed to investigate the mechanisms of muscle stabilization of the wrist. The specimens were set in a jig allowing the distal row to migrate proximally and rotate around the axis of pronosupination. The extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) was loaded with specific weights. Reactive rotations of the scaphoid, triquetrum, and capitate were measured by an electromagnetic motion tracking device. Loading the ECU caused pronation of both proximal and distal rows. After sectioning its sheath, the overall direction of the movement remained unchanged, but there was a 40% and 50% decrease of the pronation power over the distal and proximal carpal row, respectively. In addition to stabilizing the distal radiolunar joint, the ECU is an important structure that contributes to the dynamic stability of the wrist. Furthermore, its sheath plays a crucial role in maintaining the effect of the ECU muscle on the carpus.
Determination as to whether it is necessary to fix a coronoid fracture should be based on the stability of the elbow when tested with a varus load. The elbow may potentially be stable with fractures involving less than 50% of the coronoid. Under all circumstances, the radial head should be fixed or replaced to ensure valgus external rotatory stability.
The data from our cadaveric model support the use of either implant type in terrible triad injuries if the collateral ligaments are intact or reconstructed.
Background: Tendon transfers are often used in foot and ankle surgery. Different fixation devices and techniques have been described. The most recently developed ones are bone anchors and interference screws. Materials and Methods: A biomechanical study was designed to compare tendon transfer fixation, using Corkscrew bone anchors 5 × 15.5 mm and Biointerference screws (8 × 23 mm). Fifteen fresh cadaver specimens underwent both fixation techniques for split anterior tibial tendon transfer at the cuboid bone. All the specimens underwent standardized X-rays in order to evaluate mineral bone density using a standardized measurement system. All were tested until maximal load to failure. Results: The ultimate load to failure of the tendon secured to the cuboid using anchors was 103 N (SD, 52), compared with 150 N (SD, 68) for tendons secured to the bone with interference screws (p = 0.003). No difference was found between the techniques that could be related to bone density. Conclusion: Interference screws provided greater strength than bone anchors. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrated increased strength in securing bone to tendon in vitro for SPLATT tendon transfer with interference screws as compared to suture anchors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.