This study compared commercial composite resin blocks with one ceramic block for use in computer-aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM). Four composite resins, one composite ceramic, and one feldspar-ceramic block were investigated. Flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM), and Vickers hardness (VH) were determined under three conditions: dry storage; immersion in water at 37°C for 7 days; and immersion in water at 37°C for 7 days followed by 10,000 thermocycles. After dry storage, FS ranged from 127 to 242 MPa, FM from 9.6 to 51.5 GPa, and VH from 64 to 455. Two-way ANOVA was performed for FS, FM and VH followed by Tukey's multiple comparison (α<0.05). Results demonstrated that the materials degraded after water immersion and thermocycling, but their properties were within the acceptable range for fabrication of single restorations according to the ISO standard for ceramics (ISO 6872:2008).
In this study, the wear resistance, hardness, elastic modulus, and the correlations between them of artificial denture teeth at the sub-enamel layer were examined. Four types of tested artificial denture teeth consisted of 3 conventional acrylic resin teeth (Cosmo HXL, Major Dent, and Yamahachi FX), 1 high cross-linked acrylic resin teeth (Trubyte Bioform IPN), 2 composite resin teeth (SR Orthosit PE, and Yamahachi PX), and 1 porcelain teeth (ACE Teeth). The two-body wear test was performed using a custom made pin on disc apparatus. Volume and weight loss were measured. Hardness and elastic modulus were also assessed by using a nanoindentation system. The results suggested wear resistance varied among the denture tooth materials. Wear resistance of high cross-linked acrylic resin teeth was the lowest. A definite relation between wear resistance and mechanical properties of materials could not be found in this study.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of plasma treatment on adhesion between fiber-reinforced posts and a composite core material. Two types of posts, methacrylate-based (FRC Postec) and epoxy resin-based (DT Light-Post), were treated with oxygen plasma (O2), argon plasma (Ar), nitrogen plasma (N2), or helium mixed with nitrogen plasma (He+N2) using a radio-frequency generator before bonding to a methacrylate-based composite. Pull-out tests were performed using a universal testing machine. Surface roughness of each group was evaluated using a profilometer. On tensile-shear bond strength, statistical analysis revealed that the type of post, type of plasma treatment, and their interaction significantly influenced the results (p<0.05). Tukey's test revealed significant differences in tensile-shear bond strength between the control and other plasma treatment groups (p<0.05). On surface roughness, Tukey's test revealed significant differences between the control group and the Ar group (p<0.05) with DT Light Post. Plasma treatment appeared to increase the tensile-shear bond strength between post and composite.
This study evaluated the effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Four groups of surface pretreatment (no pretreatment, etched with 98% sulfuric acid, etched with piranha solution and sandblasting with 50 µm alumina) were performed on PEEK. Surface roughness, Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis were examined. Shear bond strength (SBS) and interface characteristics were also evaluated after the specimens were bonded with resin materials. Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed significance on two main effects and interactions. Tukey's multiple comparisons test showed that the SBS of resin composite on PEEK were the highest in the group etched with 98% sulfuric acid and bonded with Heliobond ® (p<0.05). All pretreatments produced similar spectra of FTIR patterns. SEM demonstrated porosities and pitting from chemical etching, which suggested a significant influence on the adhesion between PEEK and resin materials.
This study evaluated the different amounts of 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MPS) coated alumina fi ller particles on fl exural strength and wear resistance of alumina reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base. Ten mass% of alumina fi ller silanized with 0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mass% of MPS was blended with PMMA. PMMA without alumina particles served as control. Specimens were prepared for fl exural strength and wear resistance tests (n=10). Flexural strength was determined using a 3-point bending test and volume loss was measured by in-vitro 2-body wear-testing. The results were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Tamhane's test (α=0.05). Flexural strength ranged from 95.1-117.8 MPa, while volume loss ranged from 0.038-0.160 mm 3 . Statistical analysis indicated the 0.1 mass% MPS silanized group had signifi cantly higher fl exural strength and lower volume loss than the control group. Adding alumina fi ller silanized with 0.1 mass% MPS resulted in an improvement of the fl exural strength and wear resistance of PMMA.
This study aimed to investigate the surface roughness and gloss of composite resins after using two polishing systems and toothbrushing. Six composite resins (Durafill VS, Filtek Z250, Filtek Z350 XT, Kalore, Venus Diamond, and Venus Pearl) were evaluated after polishing with two polishing systems (Sof-Lex, Venus Supra) and after toothbrushing up to 40,000 cycles. Surface roughness (Ra) and gloss were determined for each composite resin group (n=6) after silicon carbide paper grinding, polishing, and toothbrushing. Two-way ANOVA indicated significant differences in both Ra and gloss between measuring stages for the composite resins tested, except Venus Pearl, which showed significant differences only in gloss. After polishing, the Filtek Z350 XT, Kalore, and Venus Diamond showed significant increases in Ra, while all composite resin groups except the Filtek Z350 XT and Durafill VS with Sof-Lex showed increases in gloss. After toothbrushing, all composite resin demonstrated increases in Ra and decreases in gloss.
ObjectivesThis study evaluated color differences (ΔEs) and translucency parameter changes (ΔTPs) of various computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks after immersion in coffee.Materials and MethodsEight CAD/CAM blocks and four restorative composite resins were evaluated. The CIE L*a*b* values of 2.0 mm thick disk-shaped specimens were measured using the spectrophotometer on white and black backgrounds (n = 6). The ΔEs and ΔTPs of one day, one week, and one month immersion in coffee or water were calculated. The values of each material were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). The ΔEs after prophylaxis paste polishing of 1 month coffee immersion specimens, water sorption and solubility were also evaluated.ResultsAfter one month in coffee, ΔEs of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks and restorative composites ranged from 1.6 to 3.7 and from 2.1 to 7.9, respectively, and ΔTPs decreased. The ANOVA of ΔEs and ΔTPs revealed significant differences in two main factors, immersion periods and media, and their interaction except for ΔEs of TEL (Telio CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent). The ΔEs significantly decreased after prophylaxis polishing except GRA (Gradia Block, GC). There was no significant correlation between ΔEs and water sorption or solubility in water.ConclusionsThe ΔEs of CAD/CAM blocks after immersion in coffee varied among products and were comparable to those of restorative composite resins. The discoloration of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks could be effectively removed with prophylaxis paste polishing, while that of some restorative composites could not be removed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.