Background-Calcineurin may play a pivotal role in the signaling of cardiac hypertrophy; since this hypothesis was first put forward, controversial reports have been published using various experimental models. . Treatment with cyclosporin A completely inhibited the development of LVH in EX rats, but it only partially attenuated the development of LVH in AC4 rats. Conclusions-Calcineurin was activated in exercise-induced physiological LVH and in the developing phase of LVH (AC1), but not in decompensated pressure-overload hypertrophy (AC4). Cyclosporin therapy for the prevention of LVH may be harmful because it does not block the development of pathological hypertrophy but rather that of favorable adaptive hypertrophy.

The Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) on the plasma membrane is thought to be the main calcium extrusion system from the cytosol to the extracellular space in many mammalian excitable cells, including cardiac myocytes. However, the pathophysiological role of NCX in the heart is still unclear because of the lack of known specific inhibitors of NCX. To determine the role of NCX in cardiac contraction and the development of cardiac hypertrophy, we imposed pressure overload on the heart of heterozygous NCX knockout (KO) mice by constricting transverse aorta, and examined cardiac function and morphology 3 wk after operation. Although there was no difference in cardiac function between sham-operated KO mice and sham-operated wild-type (WT) mice, KO mice showed higher left ventricular pressure and better systolic function than WT mice in response to pressure overload. Northern blot analysis revealed that mRNA levels of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase were reduced by pressure overload in left ventricles of WT but not of KO mice. However, hypertrophic changes with interstitial fibrosis were more prominent in KO mice than WT mice. These results suggest that reduction of NCX results in supernormalized cardiac function and causes marked cardiac hypertrophy in response to pressure overload.

No abstract

SUMMARYAn asymptomatic 35 year-old man was referred to our hospital because of abnormal ECG findings. The ECG showed complete right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock. Echocardiography revealed a moderately enlarged right ventricle (RV) and an apical aneurysm. RV wall motion showed diffusely moderate impairment, while the systolic function of the left ventricle (LV) was slightly decreased. The ejection fractions (EF) of the RV and LV were calculated as 28.1% and 41.9% by Simpson's method using multiple cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans. A 24 hour ambulatory ECG showed only 372 single premature ventricular contractions (PVC). Cardiac catheterizaion revealed that the RV was enlarged with prominent trabeculation and decreased motion. In an electrophysiologic study, neither electrical stimulation of the RV nor electrical stimulation plus isoproterenol infusion could induce ventricular tachycardia. Pathological examination of a biopsy from the interventricular septum of the RV revealed fibrofatty change in the myocardium. Based on these results, we made a diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventriclular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and administered 5 mg of carvedilol. Sixty days after the initiation of carvedilol therapy, we performed repeat cardiac CT. The EF of the LV was markedly improved from 41.9% to 62.0%, although the EF of the RV was not changed. The number of PVCs showed no change. This case suggests that carvedilol is not only useful for controlling arrhythmia but also for improving left ventriclular function in some patients with ARVC. Sympathetic overactivity is reported to cause sudden death, so carvedilol may be a first-line drug for some patients with ARVC. (Jpn Heart J 2004; 45: 169-177)

No abstract

SUMMARYAngiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have been emerging as drugs to treat atherosclerosis. The effectiveness of the ARB losartan at reducing atherosclerosis was compared with that of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients.A total of 50 patients with hypertension were divided into 3 groups: a control group receiving neither an ARB nor an ACE inhibitor (n = 14), a losartan group (n = 22) receiving 50 mg/day of losartan, and an ACE inhibitor group (n = 14) receiving either 5 mg/ day of enalapril or 5 mg/day of imidapril. Atherosclerosis was evaluated based on the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery measured by B-mode ultrasound at baseline and after approximately 12 months of treatment.After the treatment, IMT significantly decreased with losartan (from 0.87 ± 0.14 to 0.79 ± 0.16 mm, P < 0.05) and with ACE inhibitor (from 0.81 ± 0.14 to 0.74 ± 0.11 mm, P < 0.05). The reduction was comparable between the two groups, -0.078 ± 0.136 with losartan and -0.073 ± 0.109 mm with ACE inhibitor, and the rate of the reduction was similar between the two drugs; -0.098 ± 0.142 mm/year with losartan and (-0.076 ± 0.118 mm/year) with ACE inhibitor. On the contrary, IMT did not change in the control group (from 0.90 ± 0.20 to 0.95 ± 0.26 mm) during the treatment period. Concomitant medication and coronary risk factors such as hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking did not differ significantly among the groups.The antiatherosclerotic effect of losartan on the carotid artery was comparable to that of ACE-inhibitors, and less adverse effects, such as coughing that occurs with ACE inhibitors, were observed. Losartan appears to be a better alternative to ACE inhibitors for treating atherosclerosis in Japanese hypertensive patients. (Int Heart J 2008; 49: 95-103)

No abstract

No abstract