BACKGROUND: We examined plasma microRNA (miRNA) concentrations from patients with gastric cancers (GCs) to assess their clinical application for diagnosing and monitoring diseases. METHODS: We initially investigated the appropriateness of plasma miRNA assay, and then compared plasma miRNA results with the expressions in cancer tissues from eight GC patients, and also compared plasma miRNAs between pre-and post-operative paired samples from 10 GC patients. Then, plasma miRNAs (miR-17-5p, miR-21, miR-106a, miR-106b and let-7a) were analysed in 69 GC patients and 30 healthy volunteers in total. RESULTS: The initial analysis showed that miRNAs were stable and detectable in all plasma samples, and the plasma miRNA levels reflected the tumour miRNAs in most cases. The levels of these miRNAs were significantly reduced in post-operative samples. In large-scale analysis, the plasma concentrations of miRNAs (miR-17-5p, miR-21, miR-106a, miR-106b) were significantly higher in GC patients than controls (P ¼ 0.05, 0.006, 0.008 and o0.001 respectively), whereas let-7a was lower in GC patients (P ¼ 0.002). The values of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve were 0.721 for the miR-106b assay and 0.879 for the miR-106a/ let-7a ratio assay. CONCLUSION: Detection of circulating miRNAs might provide new complementary tumour markers for GC.

Background:Several recent studies demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are stably detectable in plasma/serum. We hypothesised that plasma miRNAs concentrations contributed to potential biomarkers in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Methods:We selected three oncogenic miRNAs (miR-21, miR-184, miR-221) and one tumour suppressive miRNA (miR-375), which are frequently reported in squamous cell carcinoma, as candidate targets for this plasma miRNA assay. This study was divided into three steps: (1) Determination of appropriate plasma miRNAs in preliminary tests. (2) Evaluation of whether the plasma miRNA assays could monitor tumour dynamics. (3) Validation study on the clinical application of plasma miRNA assays in 50 ESCC patients and 20 healthy volunteers.Results:(1) In preliminary tests, the plasma level of miR-21 was significantly higher (P=0.0218) and that of miR-375 (P=0.0052) was significantly lower in ESCC patients than controls. (2) The high plasma miR-21 levels reflected tumour levels in all cases (100%). The plasma level of miR-21 was significantly reduced in postoperative samples (P=0.0058). (3) On validation analysis, the plasma level of miR-21 tended to be higher in ESCC patients (P=0.0649), while that of miR-375 was significantly lower (P<0.0001) and the miR-21/miR-375 ratio was significantly higher (P<0.0001) in ESCC patients than in controls. The value of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.816 for the miR-21/miR-375 ratio assay. Patients with a high plasma level of miR-21 tended to have greater vascular invasion (P=0.1554) and to show a high correlation with recurrence (P=0.0164).Conclusion:Detection of circulating miRNAs might provide new complementary tumour markers for ESCC.

Background:Several recent studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are stably detectable in the plasma/serum. We hypothesised that miR-18a in the plasma is a potential biomarker in patients with pancreatic cancer.Methods:miR-18a is located in the miR-17–92 cluster and reported to be highly expressed in pancreatic cancer tissues. This study was divided into three parts: (1) Confirmation of higher miR-18a levels in primary pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines than in normal pancreatic tissues and a human fibroblast cell line. (2) Evaluation of the plasma miR-18a assay using quantitative RT–PCR by comparing plasma results obtained from 36 patients with pancreatic cancer and from 30 healthy volunteers. (3) Evaluation of the assay for monitoring tumour dynamics in patients with pancreatic cancer.Results:(1) The expression of miR-18a was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer tissues (P=0.012) and pancreatic cancer cell lines (P=0.015) than in normal tissues and fibroblasts. (2) Plasma concentrations of miR-18a were significantly higher in pancreatic cancer patients than in controls (P<0.0001). The value of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9369. (3) Plasma levels of miR-18a were significantly lower in postoperative samples than in preoperative samples (P=0.0077).Conclusion:Circulating miR-18a might provide new complementary tumour markers for pancreatic cancer.

Background:Several recent studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are stably detectable in plasma/serum. We tested miR-221 and miR-375, which are frequently reported to be highly and poorly expressed in pancreatic cancer (PCa), as candidates for plasma biomarkers in PCa.Methods:This study was divided into three parts: (1) Confirmation of higher miR-221 levels in primary PCa tissue and cell lines than normal pancreatic tissues. (2) Evaluation of plasma miR-221 and miR-375 concentrations by comparing results from 47 consecutive PCa patients and 30 healthy volunteers. (3) Evaluation of the assay for monitoring tumour dynamics in PCa patients.Results:(1) Expression of miR-221 was significantly higher in PCa tissues and cell lines than normal pancreatic tissues. (2) Plasma miR-221 concentrations were significantly higher in PCa patients than that in benign pancreatic tumours (P=0.016) and controls (P<0.0005), while plasma miR-375 concentrations tended to be lower in PCa patients (P=0.064), and the miR-221/miR-375 ratio was significantly higher (P<0.0001) in PCa patients than in controls. (3) Plasma miR-221 concentrations were significantly reduced in postoperative samples (P=0.018). Furthermore, PCa patients with high plasma miR-221 concentrations had significant correlation with distant metastasis (P=0.041), and non-resectable status (P=0.021).Conclusion:Plasma miR-221 could be a useful biomarker for cancer detection, monitoring tumour dynamics and predicting malignant outcomes in PCa patients, and may contribute to clinical decision making in PCa treatments.

Although we have identified two putative targets, ATF3 and CENPF, for a frequently gained/amplified region around 1q32-q41 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), it is possible that other amplification targets remain to be identified. In this study, we tested whether SET and MYND domain-containing protein 2 (SMYD2), located between those two genes and encoding a lysine methyltransferase for histone H3K36 and p53K370 that regulates transcription and inhibits transactivation activity, respectively, acts as a cancer-promoting gene through activation/overexpression in ESCC. Frequent overexpression of SMYD2 messenger RNA and protein was observed in KYSE150 cells with remarkable amplification at 1q32-41.1 and other ESCC cell lines (11/43 lines, 25.6%). Overexpression of SMYD2 protein was frequently detected in primary tumor samples of ESCC (117/153 cases, 76.5%) as well and significantly correlated with gender, venous invasion, the pT category in the tumor-lymph node-metastases classification and status of recurrence. Patients with SMYD2-overexpressing tumors had a worse overall rate of survival than those with non-expressing tumors, and SMYD2 positivity was independently associated with a worse outcome in the multivariate analysis. Knockdown of SMYD2 expression inhibited and ectopic overexpression of SMYD2 promoted the proliferation of ESCC cells in a TP53 mutation-independent but SMYD2 expression-dependent manner. These findings suggest that SMYD2 plays an important role in tumor cell proliferation through its activation/overexpression and highlight its usefulness as a prognosticator and potential therapeutic target in ESCC.