These findings point toward the possibility that phosphoric acid solution could be a promising agent for smear layer removal.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Patients presenting deep probing depth and undergoing periodontal treatment for at least 6 months, with no positive response to periodontal therapy, might benefit with the endodontic treatment.

The aim of this work was to evaluate, by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), the different irrigation protocols concerning the formation of chemical smear layer (CSL). Fifty-five teeth were instrumented by using distilled water (DW) as irrigant. Next, the teeth were submitted to a protocol for removal of the mechanical smear layer produced. The teeth were divided into 11 groups, according to irrigation regimen. Then, the teeth were prepared and analyzed with SEM and EDS. Only in Group 1 [1 mL sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) + 10 mL DW + 1 mL chlorhexidine (CHX) solution], Group 2 [1 mL NaOCl + 10 mL DW + 1 mL ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) + 10 mL DW + 1 mL CHX solution], and Group 3 [1 mL NaOCl + 10 mL DW + 1 mL citric acid (CA) + 10 mL DW + 1 mL CHX solution], the formation of CSL was observed. In the groups where CHX gel was used alone or in association with EDTA, CA, phosphoric acid (PA), and CHX solution, no formation of CSL was observed. According to the results found in the cases in which one wants to associate NaOCl with CHX, the protocol using PA (1 mL NaOCl + 10 mL DW + 1 mL PA + 10 mL DW + 1 mL CHX solution) did not induce formation of CSL.

Introduction: Gutta-percha (GP) and Resilon (Res) cones are usually disinfected by the use of solutions such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). The aims of this study were to evaluate the surface free energy of GP and Res cones after disinfection procedures and to investigate the wettability of endodontic sealers in contact with these surfaces. Methods: GP and Res flat smooth surfaces were prepared. Thirty-six samples of each material were used. The samples were divided into 6 groups as follows: Control group GP, immersed in Milli-Q water (MQW); CHX group GP, immersed in 2% CHX solution and then washed with MQW; NaOCl group GP, immersed in 5.25% NaOCl and then washed with MQW; Control group Res, immersed in MQW; CHX group Res, immersed in 2% CHX solution and then washed with MQW; and NaOCl group Res, immersed in 5.25% NaOCl and then washed with MQW. Samples were analyzed first with a goniometer to measure the contact angle between the test surfaces and 3 solutions (water, ethylene glycol, and diiodomethane) to determine the surface free energy. Then the contact angle between surfaces and each one of the sealers tested, AH Plus and Real Seal SE, was measured. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: The results showed that when disinfectant solutions were used, the surface free energy was greater. When evaluating the interaction between materials and sealers, the use of CHX presented lower values of contact angle, followed by NaOCl. Conclusions: It was concluded that the solutions used in decontamination increase the surface free energy, promoting high interaction between GP/ Res and sealers. (J Endod 2011;37:980-982)

No abstract