Adrenal incidentaloma (AI) and adrenal masses in cases of subclinical Cushing's syndrome (SCS) initially require follow-up imaging. In this study we used endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a method for high-resolution imaging. The aim was to evaluate the growth rate of AI and SCS by EUS. This retrospective analysis included 93 out of 229 patients with AI or SCS who were investigated longitudinally by EUS in our university hospital between 1997 and 2013. The longitudinal follow-up required at least two investigations by EUS and evaluation of endocrine function. Plasma renin, serum aldosterone, 24 h urinary catecholamines and 2 mg dexamethasone suppression test were performed. EUS was performed at baseline and during follow-up. Each time, the maximum diameter was measured. Three groups were defined: non-functioning adenomas (NFA), non-functioning nodular hyperplasias (NFH) and SCS. 86 patients had non-functioning masses [NFM] (59 NFA, 48 NFH) and 7 patients had SCS (10 masses). At baseline the mean diameter was 19.4 (± 9.3) mm (NFM) and 19.6 (± 9.2) mm (SCS). The mean follow-up period was 31.6 ± 28.7 months. The estimated mean growth rates per year were low: They were 0.35 mm/yr [NFA], 0.02 mm/yr [NFH] and 0.53 mm/yr [SCS]. Furthermore, there was no malignant progression of any mass. The growth rate as determined by EUS was low for all tumor entities observed in this study. There was no difference in tumor growth between the groups.

In the majority of cases, positive fasting test, negative toxicology, and detection of a typical pancreatic lesion at endoscopic ultrasound is sufficient for the diagnosis of insulinoma and the definition of the appropriate surgical strategy. Based on our data, we suggest including endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnostic work-up of organic hyperinsulinism in selected patients with inconclusive or uncertain diagnosis before surgery.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (UICC stage II and III) has been under investigation over the last 30 years, regarding treatment duration and regimens. In this review, choice of regimen, its duration, possible limitations and future perspectives are discussed. Monotherapy with 5-fluorouracil was followed by addition of oxaliplatin, resulting in improved 3-yr disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, but also increased peripheral sensory neurotoxicity (PSN). The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant therapy (IDEA) collaboration demonstrated less toxicity, especially PSN, when shortening treatment duration to 3 months. However, formally, the anticipated non-inferiority of 3 months with fluoropyrimidine (FP)/oxaliplatin over 6 months (at 3-yr DFS) was not met for all patients groups, although subgroup analyses showed non-inferiority with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX) rather than with FOLFOX, and also in relation to the prognostic information (e.g., clinical low-risk group, pT1-3 N0). In addition, first data of newer parameters like Immunoscore® and ctDNA show promising results as stratification parameters. Further investigations to better define clinical risk groups and prognostic factors are mandatory. Besides this, individual decision-making of treatment intensity (FP or FP/oxaliplatin) and duration should always consider patient characteristics and preferences, also given the absolute relatively small differences and their clinical relevance.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

4057 Background: 10-20% of GC are HER-2 positive. The role of perioperative anti-HER2-directed treatment is yet undefined. Methods: This randomized, open-label phase II-trial investigates the benefit of combining T alone or with P and perioperative CT for GC and EGJC. Between 2015 and 2021,172 of a planned 215 patients (pts) with centrally confirmed, positive HER-2 status and resectable GC or EGJC (UICC TNM stages Ib-III) were included. Recruitment was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual. Pts were randomized in a 1:2:2 ratio to: Arm A (CT alone) (35 pts); Arm B (CT+ T [8mg/kg, followed by 6mg every 3 weeks]) (67 pts); Arm C (CT + T+ P [840mg every 3 weeks]) (70 pts). CT was initially cisplatin (80 mg/m2 d1) and capecitabine (2 x 1000 mg/m2/d d1) for 3 cycles before and after surgery. After publication of the FLOT-4 study, the protocol was amended. CT changed to four cycles FLOT (Al-Batran Lancet 2019) with FOLFOX or CAPOX as alternative for pts ineligible for FLOT. In the experimental arms, T and P were continued beyond CT at the same dose for a total of 17 cycles. Major pathological response rate (mpRR) determined by central pathology review was the primary endpoint. The study was designed to have 80% power to detect an increase in mpRR from 25% with CT to 45% with CT+T+P or CT+T with a one-sided alpha of 10%. CT+T+P was first tested versus CT and if positive, CT+T would be tested versus CT. Results: Out of 172 pts randomized, 161 fulfilled all important eligibility criteria and started their allocated treatment (per protocol population). 62.1% of pts had EGJC and 72.0% an intestinal subtype. Main CT regimens were cisplatin+capecitabine (42.2%) and FLOT (46.6%). In Arm A:B:C, 90.9%, 92.2% and 81.3% completed neoadjuvant treatment. Major reason for treatment discontinuation was toxicity (70%). Surgery was performed in 84.8%, 98.4%, 92.2% pts in Arm A:B:C. R0 resection rates were 83.9%, 90.3% and 85.9%. At present, results of central pathology review of mpRR are available for 126 out of 150 operated pts (84.0%). Pts not operated (n=11) were considered as failures for mpRR. MpRR was 23.3%, 37.0%, 26.4% in Arm A:B:C. The increase of 3.1% (80% CI: [-9.5%, 15.7%], one-sided p=0.378) in Arm C vs. A was not statistically significant. The increase in Arm B vs. A was 13.7% (80% CI: [0.7%,26.7%], one-sided p=0.099). MpRR was 33.3%, 53.3% and 37.9% in Arm A:B:C after amending the protocol while, in contrast, it was 8.3%, 16.7% and 12.5% before. Conclusions: The primary endpoint analysis did not meet the pre-specified criteria of efficacy for the combination of CT+T+P. However, CT+T showed interesting response rates, especially with FLOT as CT backbone. Follow-up data including survival is necessary to define the clinical value of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02205047 .