Supporting personhood was identified as a critical key concept underpinning quality residential aged care, from the perspective of both people with cognitive impairment and their family members. This highlights the important contribution that the psychological and social characteristics of care make to providing a good quality residential care experience from the perspective of consumers with dementia.

ecreased mobility is one of the major concerns for patients who suffer a stroke.1 Demand for stroke rehabilitation exceeds supply, and because length of hospital stay is decreasing, new approaches to deliver rehabilitation are needed to improve health outcomes and promote independent living. Early Supported Discharge and Home Rehabilitation services for patients who have suffered a stroke offer an approach to managing rising demand for hospital beds and seem to achieve comparable clinical outcomes to inpatient rehabilitation.2,3 Shorter lengths of stay, however, can mean less access to therapists, potentially less recovery, and more burden to the caregiver and family; therefore, novel, more efficient approaches to augment practice with less costs are needed. 4 One way of increasing the intensity of exercise therapy is to actively involve family members in the rehabilitation process. 5,6 Training caregivers as co-therapists enables them to assist with exercise delivery and increase practice intensity without increasing staff time. However, studies examining caregiver-mediated rehabilitative exercise are scarce, and the effects on patient and caregiver outcomes are under investigation. 6Background and Purpose-This proof-of-concept trial investigated the effects of an 8-week program of caregiver-mediated exercises commenced in hospital combined with tele-rehabilitation services on patient self-reported mobility and caregiver burden. Methods-Sixty-three hospitalized stroke patients (mean age 68.7, 64% female) were randomly allocated to an 8-week caregiver-mediated exercises program with e-health support or usual care. Primary outcome was the Stroke Impact Scale mobility domain. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, other Stroke Impact Scale domains, readmissions, motor impairment, strength, walking ability, balance, mobility, (extended) activities of daily living, psychosocial functioning, self-efficacy, quality of life, and fatigue. Additionally, caregiver's self-reported fatigue, symptoms of anxiety, self-efficacy, and strain were assessed. Assessments were completed at baseline and at 8 and 12 weeks. Results-Intention-to-treat analysis showed no between-group difference in Stroke Impact Scale mobility (P=0.6); however, carers reported less fatigue (4.6, confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.3-8.8; P=0.04) and higher self-efficacy (−3.3, CI 95% −5.7 to −0.9; P=0.01) at week 12. Per-protocol analysis, examining those who were discharged home with tele-rehabilitation demonstrated a trend toward improved mobility (−9.8, CI 95% −20.1 to 0.4; P=0.06), significantly improved extended activities of daily living scores at week 8 (−3.6, CI 95% −6.3 to −0.8; P=0.01) and week 12 (3.0, CI 95% −5.8 to −0.3; P=0.03), a 9-day shorter length of stay (P=0.046), and fewer readmissions over 12 months (P<0.05). Conclusions-Caregiver-mediated exercises supported by tele-rehabilitation show promise to augment intensity of practice, resulting in improved patient-extended activities of daily living, reduced length of stay with fewer readm...

We investigated the feasibility of providing telerehabilitation in the home as an alternative to conventional ambulatory rehabilitation. Two groups of patients were accepted for telerehabilitation. The first group were community patients who needed rehabilitation, e.g. following a stroke, a fracture or prolonged hospital admission. The second group was from two rural nursing homes where residents were identified with a recent injury, fall or hospitalisation. Telerehabilitation employed a coaching model, with fewer therapist home visits, more feedback and "homework" for the patient. Patients had a tablet computer loaded with a videoconferencing app to connect with therapists and relevant therapeutic apps. Multidisciplinary care was provided for up to 8 weeks. The majority (86%) of eligible patients consented to receive telerehabilitation in their own home (n = 61) or in the country nursing home where they lived (n = 17). Most services were delivered using the 3G and 4G wireless networks with few technical problems. On average participants felt that they had achieved 75% of the goals set at the beginning of the programme. High levels of satisfaction were recorded. There was a 50% reduction in home visits by staff, or 10 visits per patient. Speech therapists were able to double occasions of service and direct patient contact time, whilst halving their travel time. Previous experience with technology and age were not barriers to this method of delivery but did affect recruitment. Telerehabilitation using off-the-shelf technology is feasible for post-acute treatment.

Background and objectiveAlthough trials continue to emerge supporting the role of telerehabilitation, implementation has been slow. Key users include older people living with disabilities who are frequent users of hospital rehabilitation services but whose voices are rarely heard. It is unclear whether the use of technologies and reduced face‐to‐face contact is acceptable to these people. We report on a qualitative study of community dwelling participants who had received a home telerehabilitation programme as an alternative to conventional rehabilitation.DesignThirteen older participants, three spouses and one carer were interviewed. All had participated in an individualized therapy programme, using a combination of face‐to‐face and video consults with therapists. The programme used ‘off‐the‐shelf’ technologies including iPads for videoconferencing and electronic FitBitR devices. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo software.ResultsThematic analysis resulted in five emergent themes: (i) telerehabilitation is convenient; (ii) telerehabilitation promotes motivation and self‐awareness; (iii) telerehabilitation fosters positive therapeutic relationships; (iv) mastering technologies used by younger relatives is a valued aspect of telerehabilitation; and (v) Telerehabilitation does not replace traditional face‐to‐face rehabilitation therapies.ConclusionsParticipants found telerehabilitation convenient and motivating, coped well with the technology and developed positive therapeutic relationships. The learning and practice aspects sat well in the context of a rehabilitation programme. The use of commercially available technologies may have contributed to respondents' high levels of acceptability. The perception of telerehabilitation as complementary to in‐person care and the expectation of technological support have implications for the implementation and delivery of telerehabilitation services to older people.

BackgroundDigitally enabled rehabilitation may lead to better outcomes but has not been tested in large pragmatic trials. We aimed to evaluate a tailored prescription of affordable digital devices in addition to usual care for people with mobility limitations admitted to aged care and neurological rehabilitation.

Background

BackgroundTelehealth technologies, which enable delivery of healthcare services at distance, offer promise for responding to the challenges created by an ageing population. However, successful implementation of telehealth into mainstream healthcare systems has been slow and fraught with failure. Understanding of frontline providers’ experiences and attitudes regarding telehealth is a crucial aspect of successful implementation. This study aims to examine healthcare worker views on telehealth, and their implications for implementation to mainstream healthcare services for older people. The study includes a focus on two further dimensions of urban versus rural services and level of clinician experience with telehealth.MethodsSeven semi-structured focus groups were conducted with a total of 44 healthcare workers providing services to older people in the areas of rehabilitation and allied health, residential aged care and palliative care. Focus groups included both telehealth experienced and inexperienced groups. Of the experienced groups, two provided services to both urban and rural patients, and two to rural patients. Inexperienced groups included one rural and two urban. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify predominant themes. Between-group differences and agreement in viewpoints for each of these themes are discussed and mapped to the theoretical constructs of Normalization Process Theory.ResultsThe views of participants varied with the extent of telehealth experience and perception of accessibility of healthcare services. Four themes describing clinician attitudes and perceptions that could impact on successful implementation of telehealth services are outlined: 1) Workability of telehealth: exponential growth in access or decay in the quality of healthcare? 2) What is an acceptable level of risk to patient safety with telehealth? 3) Shifting responsibilities and recalibrating the team; and 4) Change of architecture required to enable integration of telehealth service delivery.ConclusionsThe use of telehealth technologies to provide healthcare services to older people may be more readily normalized in areas where existing services are limited. Though exposure to telehealth may be a factor, changes to the perceived feasibility of telehealth in relation to conventional services, as well as supportive infrastructure and training and skill recalibration may be more critical to successful normalization of telehealth services for older people.

Further consideration of how to incorporate individualised dietary care is needed to fully implement person-centred care and support the quality of life of those receiving nursing home care.