No abstract

No abstract

PurposeThe prime objective of this paper is to design a green supply chain management (GSCM) framework to evaluate the performance of environmental-conscious suppliers using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach.Design/methodology/approachThe literature survey reveals critical factors for implementing GSCM, adopted methodologies and the result obtained by several researchers. Data have been collected by conducting surveys and interviews with strategic-level personnel of five esteemed organizations in automobile manufacturing sectors. A GSCM framework is developed in which a mathematical tool entropy–the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) has been used to analyze the six parameters of automobile manufacturing unit. Initially, entropy is used to find the weights of each of the parameters that influence the decision matrix of the TOPSIS method. Secondly, the proposed GSCM framework ranks the supplier. Finally, sensitivity analysis of the model satisfies the GSCM framework and benchmarked the supplier.FindingsThe result shows that “Total CO2 emission” has an influential role for GSCM sustainability, and hence, firms should put more effort to reduce emissions to improve overall performance. Again, the parameters like investment in R&D and total waste generation may be ignored in the selection process. The result reveals the benchmarked supplier and its strategies for effective sourcing, which would have an indirect effect on organizations' overall sustainability.Research limitations/implicationsThis research entirely focuses on sustainability within supply chain considering economic, social and environmental paradigms. The mathematical modeling of the proposed work considers many influential parameters and provides an easy and comprehensive decision-making technique.Practical implicationsThe methods may be adopted by the industries for sustainable supply chain management. This study benchmarks the supplier organizations and explores the adopted policies by benchmarked organizations. Other organizations should follow the policies followed by benchmarked organization for enhancing environmental, social and economic performance. Organizations striving for sustainable development can adopt this framework for evaluation of supplier performance and benchmark with better accuracy.Originality/valueThe design of the GSCM framework explores both the qualitative and quantitative data based on environmental, social and economic parameters simultaneously in the evaluation of environmentally conscious suppliers. The research also investigates the constraints of the system to implement the GSCM in automobile manufacturing unit. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis justifies the benchmarked supplier and the adopted strategies to be followed by other manufacturing unit.

PurposeSupplier selection (SS) is one of the prime competencies in a sourcing decision. Taking into account the key role played by suppliers in facilitating the implementation of green supply chain management (GSCM), it is somewhat surprising that very little research attention has been imparted to the development of a strategic sourcing model for GSCM. This research aims to develop a strategic sourcing framework in which supplier organizations are prioritized and ranked based on their GSCM performance. Accordingly, the benchmark organization is identified and its strategy is explored for GSCM performance improvement.Design/methodology/approachThe research develops an innovative GSCM performance evaluation framework using six parameters, namely, investment in corporate social responsibility, investment in research and development, utilization of renewable energy, total energy consumption, total carbon-di-oxide emissions and total waste generation. An integrated multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approach is proposed in which the entropy method calculates criteria weights. The Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and the Grey relational analysis (GRA) methods are used to rank supplier organizations based on their performance scores. A real-world case of green supplier selection (GSS) is considered in which five leading India-based automobile manufacturing organizations (Supplier 1, Supplier 2, Supplier 3, Supplier 4 and Supplier 5) are selected. Surveys with industry experts at the strategic, tactical, and operational levels are carried out to collect relevant data.FindingsThe results reveal that total carbon dioxide emission is the most influential parameter, as it gains the highest weight. On the contrary, investment in research and development, and total waste generation have no significant impact on GSCM performance. Results show that Supplier 5 secures the top rank. Hence, it is the benchmark organization.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed methodology offers an easy and comprehensive approach to sourcing decisions in the field of GSCM. The entropy weight-based COPRAS and GRA methods offer an error-free channel of decision-making and can be proficiently used to outrank various industrial sectors based on their GSCM performances. This research is specific to the automobile manufacturing supply chain. Therefore, research outcomes may vary across supply chains with distinct characteristics.Practical implicationsThe basic propositions of this research are based on a real-world case. Hence, the research findings are practically feasible. The less significant parameters identified in this study would enable managers to impart more attention to vulnerable areas for improvement. This research may help policymakers identify the influential parameters for effective GSCM implementation. As this research considers all aspects of sustainability, the strategies of the benchmark supplier have a direct impact on organizations' overall sustainability. The study would enable practitioners to make various strategies for GSCM performance improvement and to develop a cleaner production system.Originality/valueThe originality of this research lies in the consideration of both economic, social, environmental and operational aspects of sustainability for assessing the GSCM performance of supplier organizations. Quantitative criteria are considered so that vagueness can be removed from the decision. The use of an integrated grey-based approach for developing a strategic sourcing model is another unique feature of this study.

No abstract

No abstract

In1981, Dr. A.I.G.Brain 1 designed the prototype of LMA. It is an excellent device to maintain airway in selected surgeries and obviates the need for endotracheal intubation. In year 1996, LMA was incorporated in ASA difficult airway algorithm. 2 Other advantages of LMA, like smoother transition from anaesthesia to emergence with LMA in situ and requirement of lesser skill for ABSTRACT Background: Laryngeal mask airway has already gained widespread acceptance as an alternative airway device and conduit for endotracheal intubation. Insertion of this Supraglottic Airway Device (SAD) to provide and maintain a seal around the laryngeal inlet for spontaneous ventilation as well as modest level of positive pressure ventilation requires a sufficient depth of anaesthesia and depression of airway reflexes to avoid adverse reactions like gagging, coughing, head and limb movements etc. This study was conducted with the intent to compare Vital Capacity Breath (VCB) inhalation with 8% sevoflurane versus intravenous (IV) propofol for quality and ease of insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and associated complications Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 80 adult patients of ASA physical status I and II aged between 20 to 50 years, body weight <70 kg scheduled for short operative procedures under general anaesthesia were selected. The patients were divided into two groups. GroupS (n=40) were induced with 8% sevoflurane with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen with a total gas flow of 8 litres per minute and group-P (n=40) were induced with injection propofol 2.5 mg/kg body weight intravenously. Results: Insertion of LMA at first attempt was 92.5% with sevoflurane (VCB) and 95% with propofol. Time to loss of consciousness was 35.98 ± 6.23s and 36.26 ± 5.65s in group S and group P respectively. Complications were similar in both the groups. Conclusions: A vital capacity induction with sevoflurane shows a slight faster loss of consciousness. The time to successful LMA insertion at 1 st attempt and the incidence of side effects were similar in both the group (P >0.05).

No abstract