BackgroundRemote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been suggested to protect against certain forms of organ injury after cardiac surgery. Previously, we reported the main results of RIPHeart (Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery) Study, a multicenter trial randomizing 1403 cardiac surgery patients receiving either RIPC or sham‐RIPC.Methods and ResultsIn this follow‐up paper, we present 1‐year follow‐up of the composite primary end point and its individual components (all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and acute renal failure), in a sub‐group of patients, intraoperative myocardial dysfunction assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction 5 to 7 days and 3 months after surgery. RIPC neither showed any beneficial effect on the 1‐year composite primary end point (RIPC versus sham‐RIPC 16.4% versus 16.9%) and its individual components (all‐cause mortality [3.4% versus 2.5%], myocardial infarction [7.0% versus 9.4%], stroke [2.2% versus 3.1%], acute renal failure [7.0% versus 5.7%]) nor improved intraoperative myocardial dysfunction or incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction 5 to 7 days (67 [47.5%] versus 71 [53.8%] patients) and 3 months after surgery (17 [27.9%] versus 18 [27.7%] patients), respectively.ConclusionsSimilar to our main study, RIPC had no effect on intraoperative myocardial dysfunction, neurocognitive function and long‐term outcome in cardiac surgery patients undergoing propofol anesthesia.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01067703.

BackgroundThe aim of our study was the identification of genetic variants associated with postoperative complications after cardiac surgery.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial (RIPHeart). We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 1170 patients of both genders (871 males, 299 females) from the RIPHeart-Study cohort. Patients undergoing non-emergent cardiac surgery were included. Primary endpoint comprises a binary composite complication rate covering atrial fibrillation, delirium, non-fatal myocardial infarction, acute renal failure and/or any new stroke until hospital discharge with a maximum of fourteen days after surgery.ResultsA total of 547,644 genotyped markers were available for analysis. Following quality control and adjustment for clinical covariate, one SNP reached genome-wide significance (PHLPP2, rs78064607, p = 3.77 × 10− 8) and 139 (adjusted for all other outcomes) SNPs showed promising association with p < 1 × 10− 5 from the GWAS.ConclusionsWe identified several potential loci, in particular PHLPP2, BBS9, RyR2, DUSP4 and HSPA8, associated with new-onset of atrial fibrillation, delirium, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury and stroke after cardiac surgery.Trial registrationThe study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01067703, prospectively registered on 11 Feb 2010.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1002-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundThe use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion has become an important method of blood conservation. So far, there are no clinical data about the performance of the continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart.MethodsIn total, 74 patients undergoing either cardiac or orthopedic surgery were included in this prospective, bicenter and observational technical evaluation to validate red cell separation process and washout quality of CATSmart. The target of red cell separation process was defined as a hematocrit value in the packed red cell unit of 55–75% and of washout quality of 80–100% removal ratio.ResultsHematocrit values measured by CATSmart and laboratory analysis were 78.5% [71.3%; 84.0%] and 73.7% [67.5%; 75.5%], respectively. Removal ratios for platelets 94.7% [88.2%; 96.7%], free hemoglobin 89.3% [85.2%; 94.9%], albumin 97.9% [96.6%; 98.5%], heparin 99.9% [99.9%; 100.0%], and potassium 92.5% [90.8%; 95.0%] were within the target range while removal of white blood cells was slightly worse 72.4% [57.9%; 87.3%].ConclusionThe new autotransfusion device enables sufficient red cell separation and washout quality.