PrefaceThe present book concerns the design of hydraulic models. Theory cannot cover all the complications that are encountered in practice, so that almost every major project in the field of hydraulic engineering undergoes a 'model test' where, on a small scale model, the flows and their consequences corresponding to various versions of the scheme may be observed, and the relevant quantities measured. As a result of these observations and measurements, the most effective and rational design of the scheme can be determined.A hydraulic model is a precision device for the experimental investigation of a hydromechanical phenomenon, which can give reliable information only if its scales are determined according to certain definite rules; that is, if it is designed correctly. If the design is not correct, then the model is wrong in principle. In that case, the employment of the most sophisticated instrumentation and measurement methods can only help to increase the accuracy of the wrong predictions. A small scale reproduction of a physical phenomenon can be a scientifically valid model only if a certain set of its measurable characteristics are related to their counterparts in the actual phenomenon, or prototype, by certain constant proportions which satisfy definite mathematical conditions. These constant proportions are referred to as scales, whereas the mathematical conditions which must be satisfied by the scales are called the criteria of similarity. It follows that the design and realization of a true model of a phenomenon can only be achieved if the similarity criteria of that phenomenon are known. These can be revealed by the mathematical relationships (usually differential equations of motion) describing the physical nature of the phenomenon under investigation. However, the accuracy, and thus the reliability of the results determined by this method, depend entirely on the reliability of the mathematical relationships used, and if the phenomenon has not been formulated mathematically then its criteria of similarity simply cannot be v vi Preface determined. This is an ironic situation, for a model is of greatest use in those cases which cannot be formulated theoretically.Another, and considerably more effective way of determining the criteria of similarity is the dimensional method. Here, the criteria of similarity are supplied from dimensional study of the characteristics themselves and not from the mathematical relationships (containing the characteristics involved). In other words, the criteria of similarity are supplied by the dimensional method without the risk of misinterpretation of the physical nature of the phenomena (which might be inherent in mathematical relationships). The dimensional method has been the subject of considerable controversy and it has taken a long time for it to be accepted that it is not a 'dangerous tool which can often give erroneous results', but that it is a tool which, like every other mathematical tool, always gives correct results if correctly used and which gives erroneou...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.