Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to an increasing demand for online psychological intervention. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of received support in internet-based psychological intervention group (I-IG) patients, compared with a wait-list control group (CG). The Impact of Event Scale—Revised, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale 7-item were administered. After participants had used the internet-based solution, the System Usability Scale was administered. In total, 221 patients (194 patients supported by internet-based interventions and 27 patients supported onsite) were included in intervention group, and 194 patients were included in CG. In a 6-month follow-up, participants in the I-IG demonstrated significant improvements in terms of PTSD risk (p < 0.0001, d = 0.64), depression (p < 0.0001, d = 0.68), and anxiety (p < 0.0001, d = 1.33), compared to the CG. Significant improvements in onsite intervention group patients with a large to very large effect size of PTSD risk (p < 0.0001, d = 0.91), depression (p < 0.0001, d = 0.81), and anxiety (p < 0.0001, d = 1.62) were found. After internet-based solution use, I-IG patients reported a very high usability and functionality (72.87 ± 13.11) of online intervention. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2-related mental health problems can be improved by internet-based psychological intervention. The usability and functionality evaluation of online solutions by technological tools showed very positive results for the I-IG patients.
Background Roughly 50% of patients with IBD have symptoms of psychological distress (Mikocka-Walus et al. 2019) but only 15.2% receive attention for their mental health although the effect on disease severity can be profound. It is necessary to have an easy-to-administer psychological distress screening tool. The distress thermometer (DT) is a single-item distress screening scale with 11-likert response widely used in oncological patients. The aim of study was to determine whether the single-item DT compared favourably with IBD clinical indices and time consuming measures currently used to screen for distress. Methods Two hundered and twenty IBD patients (51.43% male) who were recruited in eight Italian hospitals completed the DT and identified the presence or absence of 34 problems using standardised problem list (PL). They completed the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the 32-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). Disease clinical indices have been collected for each patient (Mayo score, Harvey–Bradshaw Index–HBI, years of illness, and exacerbation in the last year). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses validated the use of the DT in Italian IBD population. Results 47.6% reported anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS ≥15) and needs emotional care. Anxiety is much more associated (43.8%) than depressive problems (26.2%). Data are confirmed by responses to DT and PL: 44.5% of patients reported moderate–severe emotional distress (TD ≥ 5), 43.1% of patients report nervousness and worry, 27.1% reported depression. We observed a strong positive correlation between IBDQ and HADS (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and DT (r = 0.58, p < 0.001), while there was a slightly smaller association with Mayo score (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and HBI (r = 0.39, p < 0.001). There was not a statistical significant correlation between disease indices and the emotional distress as measured by HADS or DT. ROC analyses showed that a DT cutoff score of 5 or higher had optimal sensitivity (83%) and specificity (68%) relative to the HADS score as ‘gold’ standard. DT scores yielded area under the curve estimates relative to the HADS cutoff score indicative of good overall accuracy (AUC = 0.81–95% CI: 0.77–0.85). Conclusion Our study confirms that anxiety and depression symptoms are associated with IBD. This is the first study that demonstrated that DT is an easy-to-administer screening tool of psychosocial distress in IBD population. We propose that gastroenterologists use DT to identify patients with psychological distress: an early psychological support and a multidisclinar equipe can determinate a patient’s better disease course (Mawdsley et al. 2005). Our analyses indicated that using a DT’s cutoff of 5 to indicate high levels of distress.
Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to a remodeling of care activity, including the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centers. According to international recommendations, we did not discontinue immunosuppressive or biologic drugs and reorganized biologic drug infusions’ administration to minimize the risk of infection. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the adherence to the scheduled biologic therapies in a single tertiary center including both IBD adult and pediatric patients treated with biological agents during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Demographic information, clinical data and the adherence to the therapy were collected in all consecutive IBD patients treated with biologic agents from March 2020 to February 2021. Moreover, we reported the clinical outcome of IBD patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results A total of 278 subjects (171 male) treated with a biologic agent (34 children) were included. The mean age was 41.6 ± 17.3 years (range 5 – 88), and the mean disease duration was 12.7 ± 10.1 years (range 0.2 – 49). One hundred eleven patients (39.9 %) had ulcerative colitis, and 167 (60.0 %) had Crohn’s disease. About the therapy: 73 patients were receiving infliximab, 93 adalimumab, 20 golimumab, 59 vedolizumab, 29 ustekinumab, and 4 an experimental compound. 31 patient, including 1 child, (11.1 %) were treated with combination therapy. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1.5 (range 0 – 8). Twenty one patients (2 pediatrics and nineteen adults) (7.5 %) had a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 infection. Only one of them (an adult man) was hospitalized but did not require intensive care unit measures. Compared to cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population in our Region, the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort was significantly higher (7.5% vs 4.0%, p < 0.002). Twelve adult patients (4.3%) postponed biologic therapy for fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first wave of the pandemic, and two of them (16.6%) experienced a clinical relapse. Conclusion In our cohort, the adherence to biologic therapy was high during the pandemic, but the rate of clinical relapse in patients who postponed the scheduled administration of therapy was relevant. Although the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly higher than in general population, the clinical impact was mild as no patients experienced a severe form of COVID-19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.