This is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy of SLIT with latex extract conducted in adult patients allergic to NRL. SLIT with latex can be proposed for subjects with latex allergy, especially those for whom complete avoidance of latex exposure may be very difficult or even impossible. More studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT in the treatment of subjects with latex allergy who are sensitized to inhalant allergens.

As the standard series detected a relatively low proportion of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, it is not adequate to recognize an occupational allergic contact dermatitis, certain supplementary series should also to be tested. However, even if such occupational series are used, we remain likely to continue to underestimate the frequency of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, because workers come into contact with a large number of substances that are often unknown.

Urticaria and angioedema (UA) represent a syndrome that is frequently encountered in children and adults. However, although they are often associated (in up to 50% of some patient populations), these two clinical entities should not be considered synonymous because they have distinct clinical and histopathological characteristics. The frequency of UA in drug-induced pathologies is quite high Here we report a retrospective survey of 2287 patients, observed between 1988 and 1997 presenting one or more episodes of drug-induced UA. In 1,973 patients (86.2%) [639 (32.4%) males and 1,334 (67.6%) females] a specific drug responsible for UA was identified. Particularly over the last two years the frequency of drug-induced UA has tended to increase, being more prevalent in females and the majority of cases (576: 23.1%) occuring during the third decade of life. The most frequently involved drugs are anti-inflammatory (particularly acetylsalicylic acid) and antimicrobial agents (mainly beta-lactams).

Previous studies evaluated the tolerance of nimesulide and paracetamol in subjects with cutaneous, respiratory and anaphylactoid reactions induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In this study we investigated tolerability and reliability of nimesulide and paracetamol in a very large number of patients with an exclusive well-documented history of NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema. Furthermore, we evaluated whether some factors have the potential to increase the risk of reaction to paracetamol and nimesulide. A single-placebo-controlled oral challenge procedure with nimesulide or paracetamol was applied to 829 patients with a history of NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema. A total of 75/829 (9.4%) patients experienced reactions to nimesulide or paracetamol. Of the 715 patients tested with nimesulide 62 (8.6%) showed a positive test, while of 114 subjects submitted to the challenge with paracetamol, 13 (9.6%) did not tolerate this drug. Furthermore, 18.28% of patients with a history of chronic urticaria and 11.8% of subjects with an history of NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema or angioedema alone (with or without chronic urticaria) resulted to be intolerant to alternative drugs. Taken together, our results confirm the good tolerability of nimesulide and paracetamol in patients who experienced urticaria/angioedema caused by NSAIDs. However, the risk of reaction to these alternative study drugs is statistically increased by a history of chronic urticaria and, above all, by a history of NSAID-induced angioedema.