A dose of only 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg guarantees hematopoietic recovery within a reasonable number of days. To initiate a leukapheresis from which enough progenitor cells may confidently be obtained, a minimum of 5 CD34+ cells per microL in PB is required.
Introduction: Recent studies have shown that young to middle-aged adults who receive a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen for treatment of Ph-neg ALL do not appear to require an alloHSCT if they achieve good response on MRD testing after induction therapy. Patients (pts) who are not good MRD responders achieve better outcomes with alloHSCT than their counterparts who do not receive alloHSCT. However, it is not clear if this approach can be translated to adult ALL pts with HR features at baseline. The aim of the prospective ALL-HR-11 trial from the Spanish PETHEMA Group was to evaluate the response to a differentiated post-induction therapy (chemotherapy or alloHSCT) according to MRD levels (assessed by 8-color, centrally-performed flow cytometry at the end of induction-week 5- and consolidation therapy-week 17-) in HR Ph-neg adult ALL patients. Patients and methods: HR ALL included one or more of the following parameters at baseline: age 30-60 yr, WBC count >30x109/L for B-cell precursor ALL or >100x109/L for thymic T-ALL, pro-B, early or mature T-ALL, 11q23 or MLL rearrangements or complex karyotype. Induction therapy included vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin and asparaginase (E coli native or PEG according to center availability) for 4 weeks (Induction-1). FLAG-Ida was administered as intensified induction (Induction-2) in pts not achieving CR or those in CR with MRD≥0.1% at the end of induction. For pts in CR and MRD<0.1% early consolidation therapy included 3 cycles with rotating cytotoxic drugs with high-dose methotrexate, high-dose ARA-C and high-dose asparaginase (E coli native or PEG). These pts continued with delayed consolidation (identical to that of early consolidation) followed by maintenance therapy up to 2 yr. in CR if MRD levels after consolidation were <0.01%, otherwise they were assigned to alloHSCT. Pts in CR after Induction-2 received one consolidation cycle and were assigned to alloHSCT. Results: On June 2015, 115 HR ALL pts were evaluable [mean (SD) age 38(13) yr, 67 males, 80/114 precursor B-ALL, 34/114 T-ALL, WBC count 56(96) x109/L]. Results of Induction-1: therapy-related death: 4(4%), resistance: 11 (10%), CR: 95(86%). MRD<0.1% at the end of induction was observed in 75% of CR patients. Induction-2 was administered to 33 patients (no CR: 11, CR and MRD≥0.1%: 22). No differences in the CR rate or in the rate of MRD clearance after induction were observed according to the type of asparaginase administered, although significantly increased hepatic toxicity in consolidation was observed in patients treated with PEG-asparaginase. The 2-yr DFS and OS probabilities for whole series were 51%±18% and 62%±13%. By intention-to treat after Induction-1 36 pts were assigned to alloHSCT and 68 to delayed consolidation and maintenance. The 2-yr DFS and OS probabilities were 54%±25% and 49%±20%, respectively, for pts assigned to alloHSCT, and 50%±22% and 73%±17%, respectively, for those assigned to chemotherapy (P=0.002 for OS comparison). Patients with MRD<0.1% at the end of induction and <0.01% at the end of consolidation (n=51) showed a 2-yr DFS and OS of 55%±25% and 81%±18%, respectively. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this trial, in which the post-induction therapy decision is only based on MRD results, suggest that in HR, Ph-neg adult ALL pts with adequate MRD response after induction and after consolidation the results of therapy are not hampered by avoiding alloHSCT. Supported by grants RD12/0036/0029 (RTICC, FEDER), PI14/01971 FIS, Instituto Carlos III, and SGR225 (GRE), Spain Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
We found that BM CD34+My percentage has an independent value concerning the IPSS-R, especially relevant for the prediction of transformation to AML and within the intermediate group.
Summary:Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are increasingly being reported after autologous transplantation. Transient dysplastic changes have also been observed after this type of treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge no systematic morphological analysis has been perfomed to determine the influence of stem cell transplantation on bone marrow morphology. In 53 patients undergoing autologous transplantation, we evaluated the bone marrow, before and 6 and 12 months after the transplant, in order to analyze the appearance of dyshemopoietic changes, assessed according to a pre-established score. We also studied 25 bone marrow samples obtained at the time of diagnosis, prior to treatment, but we did not find morphological atypia. Six months after transplant, cellularity and thrombopoiesis had decreased in 38% and 49% of patients respectively, although 1 year after the process they were normal in most cases. Myelodysplasia was already present in bone marrow before transplantation and continued to be in evidence for a long time afterwards. This suggests that chemotherapy and radiotherapy used prior to transplantation are responsible for dysplastic changes. The myeloid line was the most affected with 100% of patients showing dysgranulopoiesis 1 year after autografting. Cytopenias were observed in 51% and 44% of patients 6 and 12 months after transplantation. Moreover, concomitant presence of cytopenia and myelodysplasia was observed in 37.7% of patients at 6 months after transplantation and 25% at 12 months, and therefore they could be diagnosed with MDS. These data contrast with the incidence of secondary MDS reported in earlier publications. According to these findings, the value of the FrenchAmerican-British Co-operative Group criteria for the diagnosis of MDS following autologous transplantation is questionable. Moreover, since dyshemopoietic features are almost always present after autologous transplant, morphological criteria are not useful for early
Mini-BEAM and ESHAP are two non-cross-resistant salvage regimens that have been used separately in patients with lymphoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of the combination of these two regimens, administered in alternating cycles, as salvage therapy for refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. A total of 28 patients were included in the study: 14 patients were primary refractory, seven were partial responders, and seven were in relapse. The alternating cycles of mini-BEAM and ESHAP were given until there was maximum response or progression. The overall response rate to mini-BEAM/ESHAP was 39%; 25% of patients achieved a complete response and 14% a partial response. Nevertheless, it should be noted that none of the primary refractory patients responded to this protocol. Nine of the 11 patients who responded to mini-BEAM/ESHAP were consolidated with autologous transplantation using BEAM as a conditioning regimen. The survival at 3 years in this group of 11 patients who responded to the salvage regimen is 64%, with a disease-free survival of 67% at 2 years. No major toxic effects were observed with mini-BEAM/ESHAP. Myelosuppression was the most frequent complication, especially with the mini-BEAM cycles. Other toxicities were infrequent and no treatment-related deaths were observed. These results suggest that alternating mini-BEAM/ESHAP chemotherapy is a safe regimen that is effective in partial responders or relapsing patients with NHL who have sensitive disease, but not in primary refractory patients. Moreover, although this therapy has a potential advantage, combining as it does two non-cross-resistant regimens, it does not seem superior to ESHAP alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.