1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) following autologous transplantation should not be based only on morphological criteria used for diagnosis of de novo MDS

Abstract: Summary:Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are increasingly being reported after autologous transplantation. Transient dysplastic changes have also been observed after this type of treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge no systematic morphological analysis has been perfomed to determine the influence of stem cell transplantation on bone marrow morphology. In 53 patients undergoing autologous transplantation, we evaluated the bone marrow, before and 6 and 12 months after the transplant, in orde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time elapsed between diagnosis and transplant and, therefore, the duration of previous chemotherapy is also a determining factor. It is important to take into account the fact that the diagnosis of MDS after stem cell transplantation is puzzling, because transient cytopenias with various degrees of bone marrow dysplasia have been observed: dyserythropoiesis is almost constant (Rozman et al , 1982; Soligo et al , 1998; Amigo et al , 1999), and dysmegakaryocytopoiesis is very frequent and mostly predictive of a clonal evolution (Wilson et al , 1997). In addition, the frequency of trilineage myelodysplasia, hypoplastic forms and forms with medullar fibrosis is also problematic for diagnosis, as underlined by Laurenti et al (2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time elapsed between diagnosis and transplant and, therefore, the duration of previous chemotherapy is also a determining factor. It is important to take into account the fact that the diagnosis of MDS after stem cell transplantation is puzzling, because transient cytopenias with various degrees of bone marrow dysplasia have been observed: dyserythropoiesis is almost constant (Rozman et al , 1982; Soligo et al , 1998; Amigo et al , 1999), and dysmegakaryocytopoiesis is very frequent and mostly predictive of a clonal evolution (Wilson et al , 1997). In addition, the frequency of trilineage myelodysplasia, hypoplastic forms and forms with medullar fibrosis is also problematic for diagnosis, as underlined by Laurenti et al (2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the new WHO classification, this may increase inconsistencies in the classification of patients with t-MDS [43]. In addition, blood and bone marrow of some patients following stem cell transplantation may have dysplastic features [47,48] without evolution to fulfil the diagnostic criteria for MDS/AML [41,48]. Such patients may have evidence of transient abnormal clonal hematopoiesis [49,50].…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“… The use of chemo‐radiotherapy or biological response modifiers after autotransplant for progression disease requiring treatment. Cytogenetical alteration before conditioning regimen. Low risk MDS in absence of cytogenetic alteration (refractory anemia; refractory anemia with ringer sideroblast, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia with riger sideroblasts) during the first 12 months after aPBSCT because of mild hematopoietic cell atipia and dysplastic feature are common after chemotherapy and could be confused with MDS as reported by Amigo et al. and our group (20, 21). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Amigo et al. in 1999 (20) published a report in which the application of French American British (FAB) criteria for diagnosis of especially low‐risk MDS in the early period after transplant is questionable. Their data showed, until 12 months after autografting, dysgranulopoiesis in 100%, cytopenias in 44%, and concomitant presence of cytopenia and myelodysplasia in 25% of patients which could be diagnosed with MDS (20, 21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%