Visible in-phase signal intensity loss is relatively common within solid renal masses and was associated with RCC and particularly papillary RCC (among all RCCs) in our population. Quantitative analysis in lesions without visible signal intensity loss was not predictive of RCC. Further work should be performed to validate the usefulness of this additional imaging parameter to help characterize renal masses and to determine the impact of this finding on imaging techniques potentially sensitive to susceptibility effects.

Until recently, most solid renal neoplasms without macroscopic fat were presumed to represent renal cell carcinoma and were indiscriminately treated with nephrectomy. Expanding surgical options and ablative technologies, a growing acceptance of renal mass biopsy, the advent of targeted molecular agents, and advances in our understanding of tumor biology have challenged the wisdom of this approach and are ushering in a potential new era in which therapy is linked to histologic subtype and cytogenetics. This approach mandates evolution of our diagnostic algorithm beyond the distinction between solid and cystic and enhancing and nonenhancing. Computed tomography (CT) has traditionally been the imaging technique of choice for evaluating potential solid renal tumors, in large part due to its widespread availability, high spatial resolution, calcium discrimination, and multiphase, enhanced imaging capabilities. For the most part, however, CT is limited to characterization based upon the attenuation and enhancement characteristics of a lesion and necessitates exposure of patients to ionizing radiation. For these latter reasons, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly used to characterize solid renal masses. The purpose of this manuscript is to review our imaging approach to solid renal masses in adults utilizing MRI with an emphasis on a multiparametric approach augmented by clinical data.

No abstract

Radiologists should recognize the normal imaging findings in patients who have undergone endometrial ablation, be aware of the causes of treatment failure, and accurately identify delayed complications associated with these procedures.

No abstract

No abstract

The purpose of this pictorial review is to describe the normal appearance of the endometrium and to provide radiologists with an overview of endometrial pathology utilizing case examples. The normal appearance of the endometrium varies by age, menstrual phase, and hormonal status with differing degrees of acceptable endometrial thickness. Endometrial pathology most often manifests as either focal or diffuse endometrial thickening, and patients frequently present with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Endovaginal ultrasound (US) is the first-line modality for imaging the endometrium. This article will discuss the endometrial measurements used to direct management and workup of symptomatic patients and will discuss when additional imaging may be appropriate. Three-dimensional US is complementary to two-dimensional ultrasound and can be used as a problem-solving technique. Saline-infused sonohysterogram is a useful adjunct to delineate and detect focal intracavitary abnormalities, such as polyps and submucosal fibroids. Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred imaging modality for staging endometrial cancer because it best depicts the depth of myometrial invasion and cervical stromal involvement. Unique imaging features and complications of endometrial ablation will be introduced. At the completion of this article, the reader will understand the spectrum of normal endometrial findings and will understand the workup of common endometrial pathology.

No abstract