JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

No abstract

was supplied with fresh chicken by a single wholesaler (wholesaler A), who obtained all of the chicken that it distributed from a single farm. This farm and its immediate surroundings were investigated to determine the source(s) of the organisms colonizing the chickens. Evidence was obtained that poultry from the farm caused sporadic human campylobacteriosis in the population served by the farm for at least 18 months after the recognition of the catering college outbreak. A report on this investigation is being prepared for publication elsewhere.

WE all recognise that some diseases are more "catching" than others. Every mother knows that measles is very catching and most people set aside a group of common complaints, measles, mumps, whooping-cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria-perhaps roughly in that order-as catching complaints. Then again, still keeping ourselves within the circle of ideas of educated non-medical people, one has such complaints as common colds or influenza which one thinks of as running through a house indeed but does not put quite into the measles category, as one feels that factors determine the spread other than mere proximity to a sick person. Lastly, one has some illnesses, gonorrhoea would be a fair example, which everybody recognises to be spread wholly by contagion, almost always by a particular method of contagion, but does not regard as catching at all in the sense that measles and whooping-cough are catching. When we enquire into the reasons of these opinions they will be found, I think, to be these.An illness is held to be catching when it has usually been possible to explain the existence of a case of it by close association (of some kind) with an immediately pre-existing case; the notion of more or less infectiousness depends upon some appraisement of the proportion of persons attacked to persons exposed to the risk of attack. Mothers observe that when a child sickens with measles most of the other children take the complaint within a period of days or weeks, when a child sickens with scarlet fever the proportion of others attacked is smaller, and so on.When we are dealing practically with such complaints as measles, rough criteria such as these are sufficient; but when we seek a deeper knowledge of the epidemiology even of these common complaints they are inadequate, and when we pass to the debatable region of diseases of which the infectiousness is quite uncertain they are altogether useless. Epidemiologists without any predilections for statistical analysis have, therefore, been forced to give these popular notions an at least quasi-statistical form. They have studied the distribution of "multiple" cases of disease in groups-families, inmates of houses, etc.-and sought to draw conclusions from the frequency distribution. If, they have argued, a "case" does not breed other "cases" in the exposed to risk, then if a number of groups have been observed through a finite interval, we shall find but few instances in which any one group contains more than one affected member, and in those few cases we shall be able to account for the independent origin-independent one of another-of the multiple cases. If, on the other hand, one case does breed others, the more intense the effect the

No abstract

No abstract

Strains of Salmonella enteritidis, S. typhimurium and S. senftenberg inoculated into the yolks of shell eggs were found to survive forms of cooking where some of the yolk remained liquid. Survival was largely independent of the size of the initial inoculum. The organisms also grew rapidly in eggs stored at room temperature and after 2 days the number of cells per gram of yolk exceeded log10 8.0. With this level of contamination viable cells could be recovered from eggs cooked in any manner.

Effective cleaning in hospitals is an important aspect of infection control of pathogens such as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There is a need for simple, rapid methods of assessing cleanliness in order to effectively audit cleaning programmes and to educate staff. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence swabs for assessing cleanliness in hospitals. Sites (n=108) in three hospital wards, including floors, patient equipment and clinical workstations were examined by visual assessment, microbiological swabbing and ATP bioluminescence swabbing. Overall, ATP swabbing detected a similar number of undesirably high results compared to microbiological swabbing, but visual assessment gave significantly fewer unsatisfactory results. Highest median contamination levels (both ATP and microbiological) were obtained from floor sites under patient beds, and the lowest levels from patient equipment. It was concluded that ATP bioluminescence swabbing, while not directly equivalent to microbiological swabbing, was a useful tool for monitoring cleanliness. In addition, because of its ability to produce on-the-spot results, it proved useful during education sessions with ward staff and cleaning staff, as a novel way of demonstrating the importance of cleaning.