These results indicate that transplantation programs should consider NIV in the treatment of selected recipients of transplantation with acute respiratory failure.

IntroductionTotal hip replacement is one of the most commonly performed major orthopaedic operations. Goal-directed therapy (GDT) using haemodynamic monitoring has previously demonstrated outcome benefits in high-risk surgical patients under general anaesthesia. GDT has never been formally assessed during regional anaesthesia.MethodsPatients undergoing total hip replacement while under regional anaesthesia were randomised to either the control group (CTRL) or the protocol group (GDT). Patients in the GDT group, in addition to standard monitoring, were connected to the FloTrac sensor/Vigileo monitor haemodynamic monitoring system, and a GDT protocol was used to maximise the stroke volume and target the oxygen delivery index to > 600 mL/minute/m2.ResultsPatients randomised to the GDT group were given a greater volume of intravenous fluids during the intraoperative period (means ± standard deviation (SD): 6,032 ± 1,388 mL vs. 2,635 ± 346 mL; P < 0.0001), and more of the GDT patients received dobutamine (0 of 20 CTRL patients vs. 11 of 20 GDT patients; P < 0.0003). The GDT patients also received more blood transfused during the intraoperative period (means ± SD: 595 ± 316 mL vs. 0 ± 0 mL; P < 0.0001), although the CTRL group received greater volumes of blood replacement postoperatively (CTRL patients 658 ± 68 mL vs. GDT patients 198 ± 292 mL; P < 0.001). Overall blood consumption (intraoperatively and postoperatively) was not different between the two groups. There were an increased number of complications in the CTRL group (20 of 20 CTRL patients (100%) vs. 16 of 20 GDT patients (80%); P = 0.05). These outcomes were predominantly due to a difference in minor complications (20 of 20 CTRL patients (100%) vs. 15 of 20 GDT patients (75%); P = 0.047).ConclusionsGDT applied during regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement changes intraoperative fluid management and may improve patient outcomes by decreasing postoperative complications. Larger trials are required to confirm our findings.Trial registrationSRCTN11616985

The portal vein flow (PVF), portal vein pressure (PVP), and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were prospectively assessed to explore their relationships and to better define hyperflow and portal hypertension (PHT) during liver transplantation (LT). Eighty-one LT procedures were analyzed. No correlation between PVF and PVP was observed. Increases in the central venous pressure (CVP) were transmitted to the PVP (58%, range ¼ 25%-91%, P ¼ 0.001). Severe PHT (HVPG ! 15 mm Hg) showed a significant reciprocal association with high PVF (P ¼ 0.023) and lower graft survival (P ¼ 0.04). According to this initial experience, an HVPG value ! 15 mm Hg is a promising tool for the evaluation of hemodynamic stress potentially influencing outcomes. An algorithm for graft inflow modulation based on flows, gradients, and systemic hemodynamics is provided. In conclusion, the evaluation of PHT severity with PVP could be delusive because of the influence of CVP. PVF and PVP do not correlate and should not be used individually to assess hyperflow and PHT during LT.

No abstract

No abstract