Owing to a superior accuracy, three-dimensional echocardiography derived parameters and most notably LA minimum volume provide more relevant information on outpatient prognosis.
Objective:
we sought to identify, among all two-dimensional (2D), Doppler and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography variables, the best predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in a 4 years follow-up study.
Methods:
A population of 151 consecutive sinus rhythm outpatients (mean age 57 ± 15 years) with cardiovascular risk factors, free from previous cardiovascular events or valvular heart disease, underwent 2D, Doppler and 3D echocardiography; data were indexed by body surface area. After a mean follow up of 54 ± 3 months, the study population was divided in two subgroups according to the subsequent development of cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction and stroke) or not.
Results:
combined endpoint was reached in 28 patients (18%). These patients showed significant differences for: e/e′ ratio (p<0.001), end systolic and end diastolic left ventricular (LV) diameters (p<0.05), 2D ejection fraction (p<0.01), 3D LV end diastolic (p<0.01) and end systolic volume (p<0.01), 3D LV mass (p<0.001) and ejection fraction (p<0.01), 3D left atrial maximum (p<0.001) and minimum volumes (p<0.001). By Cox Proportional Hazard analysis we were able to identify left atrial minimum volume as the best independent predictor of cumulative events (hazard ratio: 1.286, confidence interval 1.056 to 1.565; p=0.012). Kaplan-Meier analysis allowed to highlight statistically significant differences among tertiles of 3D left atrial minimum volume in terms of combined endpoint (p=0.002; Figure
).
Conclusion:
left atrial minimum volume obtained by 3D echocardiography, was in our selected population, the most powerful independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.