2009
DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term prognostic significance of three-dimensional echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle and left atrium

Abstract: Owing to a superior accuracy, three-dimensional echocardiography derived parameters and most notably LA minimum volume provide more relevant information on outpatient prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…370,371 Compared with 2D assessment of LA volume, 3DE also has superior prognostic prediction. 372,373 The recommended upper normal indexed LA volume is 34 mL/m 2 for both genders which fits well with a risk-based approach for determination of cut-off between a normal and an enlarged LA. 323,[357][358][359] …”
Section: Echocardiographysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…370,371 Compared with 2D assessment of LA volume, 3DE also has superior prognostic prediction. 372,373 The recommended upper normal indexed LA volume is 34 mL/m 2 for both genders which fits well with a risk-based approach for determination of cut-off between a normal and an enlarged LA. 323,[357][358][359] …”
Section: Echocardiographysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the general population, LA TEF has been demonstrated to be a stronger predictor of atrial fibrillation than maximum LA volume (10), and LA TEF may thus add incremental value and information to assessments of LA size. There are also data to suggest that LAVmin may be a stronger predictor than LAVmax for cardiovascular outcomes in both the general population and in patients with myocardial infarction (16,32). LAVmin reflects both the extent of chronically elevated filling pressures and the efficacy of atrial emptying, and in our multivariate analysis, this was a stronger predictor of POAF than LAVmax was.…”
Section: Figure 2 La Tef and Poafmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In fact, MRI is nowadays considered to be the gold standard for LA dimension and function assessment [61][62][63], as it provides superior high temporal and spatial resolution, as well as high reproducibility. Three-dimensional echocardiography may also be used to assess LA volumes and function, as measurements compare well against MRI [64] and MDCT [65] and were proved to be useful for predicting cardiovascular events [66]. Although LA volumes seem to be slightly underestimated when compared to MRI measurements, LA ejection fractions are similar to those calculated using MRI [67,68].…”
Section: Comparison To Other Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%