The main goal of this work is to present a family of empirical studies that we have carried out to investigate whether the use of composite states may improve the understandability of UML statechart diagrams derived from class diagrams. Our hypotheses derive from conventional wisdom, which says that hierarchical modeling mechanisms are helpful in mastering the complexity of a software system. In our research, we have carried out three empirical studies, consisting of five experiments in total. The studies differed somewhat as regards the size of the UML statechart models, though their size and the complexity of the models were chosen so that they could be analyzed by the subjects within a limited time period. The studies also differed with respect to the type of subjects (students vs. professionals), the familiarity of the subjects with the domains of the diagrams, and other factors. To integrate the results obtained from each of the five experiments, we performed a meta-analysis study which allowed us to take into account the differences between studies and to obtain the overall effect that the use of composite states has on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams throughout all the experiments. The results Empir Software Eng (2009) obtained are not completely conclusive. They cast doubts on the usefulness of composite states for a better understanding and memorizing of UML statechart diagrams. Composite states seem only to be helpful for acquiring knowledge from the diagrams. At any rate, it should be noted that these results are affected by the previous experience of the subjects on modeling, as well as by the size and complexity of the UML statechart diagrams we used, so care should be taken when generalizing our results.

No abstract

No abstract

In software engineering it is widely acknowledged that the usage of metrics at the initial phases of the object oriented software life cycle can help designers to make better decisions and to predict external quality attributes, such as maintainability. Following this idea we have carried out three controlled experiments to ascertain if any correlation exists between the structural complexity and the size of UML class diagrams and their maintainability. We used 8 metrics for measuring the structural complexity of class diagrams due to the usage of UML relationships, and 3 metrics to measure their size. With the aim of determining which of these metrics are really relevant to be used as class diagrams maintainability indicators, we present in this work a study based on Principal Component Analysis. The obtained results show that the metrics related to associations, aggregations, generalizations and dependencies, are the most relevant whilst those related to size seem to be redundant.

No abstract

No abstract

The automatic detection of Design Smells has evolved in parallel to the evolution of automatic refactoring tools. There was a huge rise in research activity regarding Design Smell detection from 2010 to the present. However, it should be noted that the adoption of Design Smell detection in real software development practice is not comparable to the adoption of automatic refactoring tools. On the basis of the assumption that it is the objectiveness of a refactoring operation as opposed to the subjectivity in definition and identification of Design Smells that makes the difference, in this paper, the lack of agreement between different evaluators when detecting Design Smells is empirically studied. To do so, a series of experiments and studies were designed and conducted to analyse the concordance in Design Smell detection of different persons and tools, including a comparison between them. This work focuses on two well known Design Smells: God Class and Feature Envy. Concordance analysis is based on the Kappa statistic for inter-rater agreement (particularly Kappa-Fleiss). The results obtained show that there is no agreement in detection in general, and, in those cases where a certain agreement appears, it is considered to be a fair or poor degree of agreement, according to a Kappa-Fleiss interpretation scale. This seems to confirm that there is a subjective component which makes the raters evaluate the presence of Design Smells differently. The study also raises the question of a lack of training and experience regarding Design Smells.