2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11219-018-9424-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Design Smell Detection: a systematic mapping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The smell metaphor has been adopted for several categories of software projects. Alkharabsheh et al [27] carried out a systematic analysis of the state-of-the-art about code smell detection spanning over the period 2000-2017 (the smell metaphor was introduced in 1999 by Kent Beck). Sharma and Spinellis [28] is another up-to-date survey on studies about smell detection methods published in the period 1999-2016.…”
Section: Code Metrics and Code Smellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smell metaphor has been adopted for several categories of software projects. Alkharabsheh et al [27] carried out a systematic analysis of the state-of-the-art about code smell detection spanning over the period 2000-2017 (the smell metaphor was introduced in 1999 by Kent Beck). Sharma and Spinellis [28] is another up-to-date survey on studies about smell detection methods published in the period 1999-2016.…”
Section: Code Metrics and Code Smellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several tools and IDE (integrated development environment) available for detecting of code smells [37]. Code smells are suggested as an attempt by programmers to reform their software.…”
Section: Detection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sobrinho, De Lucia, and Maia reviewed [37] 351 research papers published between 1990 and 2017. Alkharabsheh, Crespo, Manso, and Taboada reviewed [2] 395 research papers published between 2000 an 2017. We relied on the Sharma and Spinellis survey as our key witness for the relevance of the question of high rates of false positives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%