The activities of 10 formulations as mycobactericidal agents in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-contaminated suspensions (suspension test) and stainless steel surfaces (carrier test) were investigated with sputum as the organic load. The quaternary ammonium compound, chlorhexidine gluconate, and an iodophor were ineffective in all tests. Ethanol (70%) was effective against M. tuberculosis only in suspension in the absence of sputum. Povidone-iodine was not as efficacious when the test organism was dried on a surface as it was in suspension, and its activity was further reduced in the presence of sputum. Sodium hypochlorite required a higher concentration of available chlorine to achieve an effective level of disinfection than did sodium dichloroisocyanurate. Phenol (5%) was effective under all test conditions, producing at least a 4-loglo reduction in CFU. The undiluted glutaraldehyde-phenate solution was effective against M. tuberculosis and a second test organism, Mycobacterium smegmatis, even in the presence of dried sputum, whereas the diluted solution (1:16) was only effective against M. smegmatis in the suspension test. A solution of 2% glutaraldehyde was effective against M. tuberculosis. This investigation presents tuberculocidal efficacy data generated by methods simulating actual practices of routine disinfection.

The efficacy of 14 disinfectants against Listeria innocua and two strains of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of organic matter was studied. Quantitative efficacy tests were used. Many of the disinfectants tested were not as effective on Listeria spp. when the test organisms were dried onto the surface of steel disks (carrier tests) as they were when the organisms were placed in suspension (suspension test). The presence of whole serum and milk (2% fat) further reduced the disinfectant capacities of most of the formulations studied. Only three disinfectants (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, and glutaraldehyde) were effective in the carrier test in the presence of serum; however, all three were ineffective when challenged with milk (2% fat). Only one solution, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, was effective in the presence of milk. All but four formulations (chloramine-T, phosphoric acid, an iodophor, and formaldehyde) were effective in the suspension tests, regardless of the organic load. L. monocytogenes was observed to be slightly more resistant to disinfection than L. innocua was. There was no difference in disinfectant susceptibility between the two strains of L. monocytogenes. These findings emphasize the need for caution in selecting an appropriate disinfectant for use on contaminated surfaces, particularly in the presence of organic material.

The efficacy of nine disinfectants on Mycobacterium smegmatis was tested in the presence of sputum, using quantitative suspension and carrier tests. Glutaraldehyde, povidone iodine, and chlorhexidine gluconate produced at least a 6-loglo reduction in CFU in all tests. Four disinfectants (sodium dichloroisocyanurate, phenol, ethanol, and sodium hypochlorite) were not as effective in the carrier tests as in the suspension tests; this difference ranged from a 1to a 5-log1o reduction in CFU. The efficacy of ethanol and sodium hypochlorite was further reduced (3-and 1-loglo reductions in CFU, respectively) in the presence of sputum. The quaternary ammonium compound and iodophor were ineffective in all tests. The findings of this study demonstrate the need for a quantitative carrier test such as the one presented here.

The recent emphasis on gloving has resulted in accounts of healthcare workers washing gloves instead of changing them. This study evaluated the efficacy of soap and three germicidal agents in decontaminating latex and vinyl medical gloves that were experimentally contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. Gloves were tested for perforations before and after the glove-washing procedure. Results of this study demonstrated that contamination was reduced from the glove surfaces. Although the routine washing of gloved hands cannot be recommended, it may be carried out under limited circumstances.

To the Editor: The report "Pseudoepidemic of Rhodotorula rubra in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy" by Hoffmann, et al. (1989;11:511-5141, although interesting, is somewhat misleading. The authors state that a 2% glutaraldehyde was used in the bronchoscope disinfection procedure preceding the outbreak. They recommend, in part, that this procedure be continued with immersion for at least 20 minutes. The report does not state which 2% glutaraldehyde was used. This is particularly significant regarding the three cases diagnosed with Mycobacterium tuberculosis because the Cidex product requires 45 minute immersion at an elevated temperature of 77°C for tuberculocidal activity, according to its Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registration. The manufacturer's label directions should be followed, as required by federal law. The report also cites a reference authored by William A. Rutala, PhD, one of the co-authors of the report. The reference, entitled "Draft Guideline for Selection and Use of Disinfectants" has been severely criticized by the EPA and other scientists for its content and support. The use of the "draft" guideline as support gives it tacit recognition.