1 As pretreatment with intraperitoneal capsaicin CAP), an agonist of the vanilloid receptor known as VR1 or transient receptor potential channel-vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (TRPV-1), has been shown to block the first phase of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fever in rats, this phase is thought to depend on the TRPV-1-bearing sensory nerve fibers originating in the abdominal cavity. However, our recent studies suggest that CAP blocks the first phase via a non-neural mechanism. In the present work, we studied whether this mechanism involves the TRPV-1. 2 Adult Long-Evans rats implanted with chronic jugular catheters were used. 3 Pretreatment with CAP (5 mg kg À1 , i.p.) 10 days before administration of LPS (10 mg kg À1 , i.v.) resulted in the loss of the entire first phase and a part of the second phase of LPS fever. 4 Pretreatment with the ultrapotent TRPV-1 agonist resiniferatoxin (RTX; 2, 20, or 200 mg kg À1 , i.p.) 10 days before administration of LPS had no effect on the first and second phases of LPS fever, but it exaggerated the third phase at the highest dose. The latter effect was presumably due to the known ability of high doses of TRPV-1 agonists to cause a loss of warm sensitivity, thus leading to uncontrolled, hyperpyretic responses. , i.p.) did not affect LPS fever, but blocked the immediate hypothermic response to acute administration of CAP. 6 It is concluded that LPS fever is initiated via a non-neural mechanism, which is CAP-sensitive but RTX-and CPZ-insensitive. The action of CAP on this mechanism is likely TRPV-1-independent. It is speculated that this mechanism may be the production of prostaglandin E 2 by macrophages in LPSprocessing organs.
Obese (f/f) Koletsky rats lack the leptin receptor (LR), whereas their lean (F/?) counterparts bear a fully functional LR. By using f/f and F/? rats, we studied whether the LR is involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced fever and hypothermia. The body temperature responses to LPS (10 or 100 µg/kg iv) were measured in Koletsky rats exposed to a thermoneutral (28°C) or cool (22°C) environment. Rats of both genotypes responded to LPS with fever at 28°C and with dose‐dependent hypothermia at 22°C. The fever responses of the f/f and F/? rats were identical. The hypothermic response of the f/f rats was markedly prolonged compared with that of the F/? rats. The prolonged hypothermic response to LPS in the f/f rats was accompanied by enhanced NF‐κB signaling in the hypothalamus and an exaggerated rise in the plasma concentration of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α. The f/f rats did not respond to LPS with an increase in the plasma concentration of corticosterone or adrenocorticotropic hormone, whereas their F/? counterparts did. The hypothermic response to TNF‐α (80 μg/kg iv) was markedly prolonged in the f/f rats. These data show that the LR is essential for the recovery from LPS hypothermia. LR‐dependent mechanisms of the recovery from LPS hypothermia include activation of the anti‐inflammatory hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenal axis, inhibition of both the production and hypothermic action of TNF‐α, and suppression of inflammatory (via NF‐κB) signaling in the hypothalamus.
Non-technical summary Systemic inflammation and related disorders, including sepsis, are leading causes of death in hospitalized patients. In most severe cases, systemic inflammation is accompanied by a drop in body temperature (hypothermia). We know that inflammation-associated hypothermia is a brain-mediated response, but mechanisms of this response are unknown. We administered a bacterial product (endotoxin) to rats to cause systemic inflammation and hypothermia. We then used a variety of pharmacological tools to probe whether three different receptors are involved in this hypothermia. We have found that one of the receptors studied, the so-called cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor, is crucial for the development of hypothermia. This is the same receptor that is responsible for many effects of marihuana (cannabis). We further show that hypothermia associated with inflammation depends on CB1 receptors located inside the brain. These novel findings suggest that brain CB1 receptors should be studied as potential therapeutic targets in systemic inflammation and sepsis.Abstract Hypothermia occurs in the most severe cases of systemic inflammation, but the mechanisms involved are poorly understood. This study evaluated whether the hypothermic response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is modulated by the endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) and its receptors: cannabinoid-1 (CB1), cannabinoid-2 (CB2) and transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1). In rats exposed to an ambient temperature of 22• C, a moderate dose of LPS (25-100 μg kg −1 I.V.) induced a fall in body temperature with a nadir at ∼100 min postinjection. This response was not affected by desensitization of intra-abdominal TRPV1 receptors with resiniferatoxin (20 μg kg −1 I.P.), by systemic TRPV1 antagonism with capsazepine (40 mg kg −1 I.P.), or by systemic CB2 receptor antagonism with SR144528 (1.4 mg kgHowever, CB1 receptor antagonism by rimonabant (4.6 mg kg −1 I.P.) or SLV319 (15 mg kgblocked LPS hypothermia. The effect of rimonabant was further studied. Rimonabant blocked LPS hypothermia when administered I.C.V. at a dose (4.6 μg) that was too low to produce systemic effects. The blockade of LPS hypothermia by I.C.V. rimonabant was associated with suppression of the circulating level of tumour necrosis factor-α. In contrast to rimonabant, the I.C.V. administration of AEA (50 μg) enhanced LPS hypothermia. Importantly, I.C.V. AEA did not evoke hypothermia in rats not treated with LPS, thus indicating that AEA modulates LPS-activated pathways in the brain rather than thermoeffector pathways. In conclusion, the present study reveals a novel, critical role of brain CB1 receptors in LPS hypothermia. Brain CB1 receptors may constitute a new therapeutic target in systemic inflammation and sepsis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.