No abstract

BackgroundTo integrate 3D MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) in the treatment planning system (TPS) for glioblastoma dose painting to guide simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).MethodsFor sixteen glioblastoma patients, we have simulated three types of dosimetry plans, one conventional plan of 60-Gy in 3D conformational radiotherapy (3D-CRT), one 60-Gy plan in IMRT and one 72-Gy plan in SIB-IMRT. All sixteen MRSI metabolic maps were integrated into TPS, using normalization with color-space conversion and threshold-based segmentation. The fusion between the metabolic maps and the planning CT scans were assessed. Dosimetry comparisons were performed between the different plans of 60-Gy 3D-CRT, 60-Gy IMRT and 72-Gy SIB-IMRT, the last plan was targeted on MRSI abnormalities and contrast enhancement (CE).ResultsFusion assessment was performed for 160 transformations. It resulted in maximum differences <1.00 mm for translation parameters and ≤1.15° for rotation. Dosimetry plans of 72-Gy SIB-IMRT and 60-Gy IMRT showed a significantly decreased maximum dose to the brainstem (44.00 and 44.30 vs. 57.01 Gy) and decreased high dose-volumes to normal brain (19 and 20 vs. 23% and 7 and 7 vs. 12%) compared to 60-Gy 3D-CRT (p < 0.05).ConclusionsDelivering standard doses to conventional target and higher doses to new target volumes characterized by MRSI and CE is now possible and does not increase dose to organs at risk. MRSI and CE abnormalities are now integrated for glioblastoma SIB-IMRT, concomitant with temozolomide, in an ongoing multi-institutional phase-III clinical trial. Our method of MR spectroscopy maps integration to TPS is robust and reliable; integration to neuronavigation systems with this method could also improve glioblastoma resection or guide biopsies.

A combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and radiation therapy (RT) represents a promising therapeutic strategy in part mediated by the abscopal effect, but clinical experience related to this combination remains scarce. Clinical data and patterns of treatment were retrospectively collected from all consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma and receiving programmed-death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Survival data, best overall response, and acute and delayed toxicities (graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 4.3) were compared between patients receiving concurrent RT (IR) or no irradiation (NIR). Fifty-nine patients received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy [pembrolizumab (n=28) or nivolumab (n=31)] between August 2014 and December 2015 at our institution. Among these, 29% (n=17) received palliative RT for a total of 21 sites, with a mean dose of 30 Gy delivered in 10 fractions. Acute and late toxicity profiles were similar in the two groups. After a 10-month median follow-up, the objective response rate (complete or partial response) was significantly higher in the IR group versus the NIR group (64.7 vs. 33.3%, P=0.02) and one complete responder after RT was compatible with an abscopal effect. The 6-month disease-free survival and overall survival rates for the NIR group versus the IR group were 49.7 versus 64.7% (P=0.32) and 58.8 versus 76.4% (P=0.42), respectively. We report here that the combination of RT and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is well tolerated and leads to a significant higher tumor response rate within and outside the irradiated field, which is emphasized by the first reported case of an abscopal effect in solid tumors.

No abstract

No abstract