This investigation compared the predictions of two models describing the integration of reinforcement and punishment effects in operant choice. Deluty's (1976) competitive-suppression model (conceptually related to two-factor punishment theories) and de Villiers' (1980) direct-suppression model (conceptually related to one-factor punishment theories) have been tested previously in nonhumans but not at the individual level in humans. Mouse clicking by college students was maintained in a two-alternative concurrent schedule of variable-interval money reinforcement. Punishment consisted of variable-interval money losses. Experiment 1 verified that money loss was an effective punisher in this context. Experiment 2 consisted of qualitative model comparisons similar to those used in previous studies involving nonhumans. Following a no-punishment baseline, punishment was superimposed upon both response alternatives. Under schedule values for which the direct-suppression model, but not the competitive-suppression model, predicted distinct shifts from baseline performance, or vice versa, 12 of 14 individual-subject functions, generated by 7 subjects, supported the direct-suppression model. When the punishment models were converted to the form of the generalized matching law, least-squares linear regression fits for a direct-suppression model were superior to those of a competitive-suppression model for 6 of 7 subjects. In Experiment 3, a more thorough quantitative test of the modified models, fits for a direct-suppression model were superior in 11 of 13 cases. These results correspond well to those of investigations conducted with nonhumans and provide the first individual-subject evidence that a direct-suppression model, evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively, describes human punishment better than a competitive-suppression model. We discuss implications for developing better punishment models and future investigations of punishment in human choice.

No abstract

No abstract

The hypothesis that a penny lost is valued more highly than a penny earned was tested in human choice. Five participants clicked a computer mouse under concurrent variable-interval schedules of monetary reinforcement. In the no-punishment condition, the schedules arranged monetary gain. In the punishment conditions, a schedule of monetary loss was superimposed on one response alternative. Deviations from generalized matching using the free parameters c (sensitivity to reinforcement) and log k (bias) were compared in the no-punishment and punishment conditions. The no-punishment conditions yielded values of log k that approximated zero for all participants, indicating no bias. In the punishment condition, values of log k deviated substantially from zero, revealing a 3-fold bias toward the unpunished alternative. Moreover, the c parameters were substantially smaller in punished conditions. The values for bias and sensitivity under punishment did not change significantly when the measure of net reinforcers (gains minus losses) was applied to the analysis. These results mean that punishment reduced the sensitivity of behavior to reinforcement and biased performance toward the unpunished alternative. We concluded that a single punisher subtracted more value than a single reinforcer added, indicating an asymmetry in the law of effect.

Selenium, a nutrient, and methylmercury, a developmental neurotoxicant, are both found in fish. There are reports that selenium sometimes ameliorates methylmercury's neurotoxicity, but little is known about the durability of this protection after low-level gestational exposure. Developmental methylmercury exposure disrupts behavioral plasticity, and these effects extend well into adulthood and aging. The present experiment was designed to examine interactions between developmental low-level methylmercury and nutritionally relevant dietary selenium on discrimination reversals in adulthood. Female rats were exposed, in utero, to 0, 0.5, or 5 ppm mercury as methylmercury via drinking water, approximating mercury exposures of 0, 40, and 400 microg/kg/day. They also received both prenatal and postnatal exposure to a diet containing selenium from casein only (0.06 ppm) or 0.6 ppm selenium, creating a 2 (chronic Se)x3 (gestational MeHg) full factorial design, with six to eight rats per cell. Behavior was evaluated with a spatial discrimination procedure using two levers and sucrose reinforcers. All groups acquired the original discrimination similarly. Rats exposed to low selenium (0.06 ppm), regardless of MeHg exposure, required more sessions to complete the first reversal and made more omissions during this reversal than high selenium (0.6 ppm) animals, but the two diet groups did not differ on subsequent reversals. Rats exposed to MeHg, regardless of selenium exposure, made more errors than controls on the first and third reversals, which was away from the original discrimination. MeHg-exposed animals also had shorter choice latencies than controls during the first session of a reversal. Low selenium increased the number of omissions during a reversal, whereas high MeHg exposure produced perseverative responding (errors) on the lever that was reinforced during the original discrimination. However, there was no interaction between selenium and MeHg exposure.

As judged by an independent study commission, anesthesia-related cardiac arrest occurred in 37 of 160 cardiac arrests within the 24-h perioperative period.

Female rats were exposed to 0, 0.5, or 6 ppm Hg (as methylmercuric chloride, 10 rats/group) in drinking water. For half the rats, exposure began 4 weeks before mating and for the others, exposure began 7 weeks before mating. All mating was done with an unexposed male. Maternal exposure continued to post-natal day (PN) 16. Blood and whole-brain mercury concentrations were determined in pups on PN 0 (birth) and PN 21 (weaning). Maternal water consumption was monitored daily during gestation and lactation. Maternal water consumption increased 2- to 3-fold through gestation for all groups. Mercury levels in blood and brain were unrelated to the duration of exposure before mating, although reproductive success appeared to be so related. Mercury levels in both media were closely related to consumption during gestation, but apparently maternal exposure during lactation did not result in exposure to the nursing pups. Brain mercury in offspring decreased between birth and weaning from 0.49 to 0.045 ppm in the low-dose rats and from 9.8 to 0.53 ppm in the high-dose rats. The brain increased in weight only about 5.5-fold during this time, indicating that there was minimal mercury exposure and some net loss from brain during this period. Brain:blood ratios averaged about 0.14 at birth and 0.24 at weaning, suggesting differential loss from neural and non-neural tissue. These ratios are higher than those reported in studies using less chronic exposure conditions or with adult rats. Brain concentrations of mercury in females in the low-dose group were about 10-15% higher than those seen in their male siblings. At the higher dose, the males had slightly higher levels of mercury in the brain than did their female siblings at birth. The relationship between brain concentration (in ppm) and cumulative mercury consumption, also expressed on a ppm basis (cumulative mercury consumed divided by maternal body weight at parturition), was not linear but was well described by a power-function relationship: Hg = A*(cum exposure)b where the exponent, b, was 1.12 and 1.17 for blood and brain, respectively, at birth. This exponent was indistinguishable from 1.0 for both media at weaning, indicating that the relationship between exposure and blood and brain levels became linear.

Most perioperative cardiac arrests were related to medication administration, airway management, and technical problems of central venous access. Improvements focused on these three areas may result in better outcomes.