Background
Renal biopsy is the cornerstone of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) nephritis and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) nephropathy management. However, transcutaneous renal biopsy (TCRB) is hampered by the antithrombotic treatment frequently prescribed for those diseases. Transjugular renal biopsy (TJRB) offers an attractive alternative for patients at increased risk of bleeding. The primary objective of the study was to describe the safety profile and diagnostic performance of TJRB in SLE and APS patients.
Methods
All SLE and/or APS patients who underwent a renal biopsy in our department (between January 2004 and October 2016) were retrospectively reviewed. Major complications were death, haemostasis nephrectomy, renal artery embolization, red blood cell transfusion, sepsis and vascular thrombosis; macroscopic haematuria, symptomatic perirenal/retroperitoneal bleeding and renal arteriovenous fistula without artery embolization were considered as minor complications.
Results
Two hundred and fifty-six TJRBs—119 without antithrombotics (untreated), 69 under aspirin and 68 on anticoagulants and 54 TCRBs without antithrombotics—were analysed. Their major and minor complication rates, respectively, did not differ significantly for the four groups: 0 and 8% for untreated TJRBs, 1 and 6% for aspirin-treated, 6 and 10% for anticoagulant-treated and 2 and 2% for TCRBs. The number of glomeruli sampled and the biopsy contribution to establishing a histological diagnosis was similar for the four groups.
Conclusions
TJRBs obtained from SLE and APS patients taking antithrombotics had diagnostic yields and safety profiles similar to those of untreated TCRBs. Thus, TJRB should be considered for SLE and APS patients at risk of bleeding.
Background and objectivesMetabolic acidosis is a frequent manifestation of sickle cell disease but the mechanisms and determinants of this disorder are unknown. Our aim was to characterize urinary acidification capacity in adults with sickle cell disease and to identify potential factors associated with decreased capacity to acidify urine.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsAmong 25 adults with sickle cell disease and an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 from a single center in France, we performed an acute acidification test after simultaneous administration of furosemide and fludrocortisone. A normal response was defined as a decrease in urinary pH <5.3 and an increase in urinary ammonium excretion ≥33 µEq/min at one or more of the six time points after furosemide and fludrocortisone administration.ResultsOf the participants (median [interquartile range] age of 36 [24–43] years old, 17 women), 12 had a normal and 13 had an abnormal response to the test. Among these 13 participants, nine had normal baseline plasma bicarbonate concentration. Plasma aldosterone was within the normal range for all 13 participants with an abnormal response, making the diagnosis of type 4 tubular acidosis unlikely. The participants with an abnormal response to the test were significantly older, more frequently treated with oral bicarbonate, had a higher plasma uric acid concentration, higher hemolysis activity, lower eGFR, lower baseline plasma bicarbonate concentration, higher urine pH, lower urine ammonium ion excretion, and lower fasting urine osmolality than those with a normal response. Considering both groups, the maximum urinary ammonium ion excretion was positively correlated with fasting urine osmolality (r2=0.34, P=0.002), suggesting that participants with sickle cell disease and lower urine concentration capacity have lower urine acidification capacity.ConclusionsAmong adults with sickle cell disease, impaired urinary acidification capacity attributable to distal tubular dysfunction is common and associated with the severity of hyposthenuria.PodcastThis article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2019_12_10_CJN07830719.mp3
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.