Context:Biochemical control reduces morbidity and increases life expectancy in patients with acromegaly. With current medical therapies, including the gold standard octreotide long-acting-release (LAR), many patients do not achieve biochemical control.Objective:Our objective was to demonstrate the superiority of pasireotide LAR over octreotide LAR in medically naive patients with acromegaly.Design and Setting:We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study at 84 sites in 27 countries.Patients:A total of 358 patients with medically naive acromegaly (GH >5 μg/L or GH nadir ≥1 μg/L after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and IGF-1 above the upper limit of normal) were enrolled. Patients either had previous pituitary surgery but no medical treatment or were de novo with a visible pituitary adenoma on magnetic resonance imaging.Interventions:Patients received pasireotide LAR 40 mg/28 days (n = 176) or octreotide LAR 20 mg/28 days (n = 182) for 12 months. At months 3 and 7, titration to pasireotide LAR 60 mg or octreotide LAR 30 mg was permitted, but not mandatory, if GH ≥2.5μg/L and/or IGF-1 was above the upper limit of normal.Main Outcome Measure:The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients in each treatment arm with biochemical control (GH <2.5 μg/L and normal IGF-1) at month 12.Results:Biochemical control was achieved by significantly more pasireotide LAR patients than octreotide LAR patients (31.3% vs 19.2%; P = .007; 35.8% vs 20.9% when including patients with IGF-1 below the lower normal limit). In pasireotide LAR and octreotide LAR patients, respectively, 38.6% and 23.6% (P = .002) achieved normal IGF-1, and 48.3% and 51.6% achieved GH <2.5 μg/L. 31.0% of pasireotide LAR and 22.2% of octreotide LAR patients who did not achieve biochemical control did not receive the recommended dose increase. Hyperglycemia-related adverse events were more common with pasireotide LAR (57.3% vs 21.7%).Conclusions:Pasireotide LAR demonstrated superior efficacy over octreotide LAR and is a viable new treatment option for acromegaly.
Increased mortality in patients with acromegaly has been confirmed in a number of retrospective studies, but causative factors and relationship to serum IGF-I remain uncertain. The West Midlands Pituitary database contains details of 419 patients (241 female) with acromegaly. Serum IGF-I data from the Regional Endocrine Laboratory were available for 360 patients (86%). At diagnosis, mean age was 47 yr (range, 12-84) and mean duration of follow-up was 13 yr (0.5-48). Sixty-one percent were treated by surgery and 39% by nonsurgical means. Radiotherapy was used alone or as adjuvant therapy in 50%. All patients were registered with the Office of National Statistics to obtain information on deaths. At the date of analysis (31 December 2001), 95 of the 419 patients had died (43 males), giving a standardized mortality ratio of 1.26 [confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.54; P = 0.046]. After controlling for age and sex, data indicated that mortality was increased in subjects with posttreatment GH levels more than 2 micro g/liter, compared with those with levels less than 2 micro g/liter [ratio of mortality rates (RR), 1.55 (range, 0.97-2.50); P = 0.068]. By contrast, a much smaller increase was observed for subjects with elevated posttreatment IGF-I levels compared with those with normal levels [RR, 1.20 (range, 0.71-2.03); P = 0.50]. Treatment with radiotherapy was associated with increased mortality [RR, 1.67 (range, 1.09-2.56); P = 0.018], with cerebrovascular disease the predominant cause of death [standardized mortality ratio, 4.42 (range, 2.71-7.22); P = 0.005]. These results confirm the increased mortality in acromegaly and suggest that reduction of GH levels to less than 2 micro g/liter is beneficial in terms of improving long-term outcome. The sole use of IGF-I as a marker for effective treatment of acromegaly is not justified by this data. This study also highlights the potential deleterious effect of radiotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.