Summary:The efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with CsA and prednisolone for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively) after BMT and PBSCT from HLA-mismatched and -matched donors was evaluated in an open single center trial. Twenty-four patients, 17-48 years of age, with acute (n = 17) and chronic GVHD (n = 7) were treated with 2 g MMF daily in addition to CsA and prednisolone. Overall grade improvement of aGVHD was found in 11 of 17 (65%) patients treated with MMF. MMF therapy in the treatment of cGVHD led to moderate improvement in three of six patients with limited cGVHD. The most common adverse hematologic events of MMF were leukopenia (n = 6), anemia (n = 4) and thrombocytopenia (n = 3). Hematological adverse events were not severe and did not require the discontinuation of MMF. In this preliminary study, we have shown that MMF can be used safely for the treatment of aGVHD. In addition, the MMF therapy resulted in significant dose reduction of prednisolone for the treatment of GVHD. Keywords: mycophenolate mofetil; GVHD; bone marrow transplantation Allogeneic BMT is an effective therapy for a variety of malignant hematopoietic disorders. One of the limitations of such therapy is donor availability. Less than 30% of patients will have an HLA-matched related donor and Ͻ5% will have a one HLA locus mismatched related donor.1,2 HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD) are an alternative for the patients lacking a suitable family member.3-5 However, the risks of developing aGVHD and cGVHD after MUD as well as after HLA-mismatched related transplants are significantly higher than after a BMT from an HLAmatched sibling. [6][7][8] The combination of immunosuppressive drugs, CsA, prednisolone and short-course MTX is an effective regimen for prevention of GVHD after BMT. 8,9 However, the incidence reported for aGVHD grades II-IV after transplan- tation from HLA-matched MUD is 78% and the incidence for grades III and IV is 36%. The incidence of cGVHD is 64%.10 Since GVHD contributes to morbidity and mortality after MUD BMT, more effective prophylaxis and therapy for this severe complication are needed. 11,12 MMF is a potent, uncompetitive, reversible inhibitor of eukaryotic inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. It is an immunosuppressant that selectively inhibits proliferation of T and B lymphocytes and is successfully used for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients.13 However, very little is known about the effect of MMF in prevention or treatment of GVHD in experimental animals.14 In addition, no data on the use of MMF in the treatment of GVHD after BMT are available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MMF in the treatment of aGVHD and cGVHD in patients after allogeneic BMT. Patients and methodsThis study included 24 patients given sibling BM (n = 6; four of which were HLA mismatched) or PBSCT (n = 3; two of which were mismatched) or allogeneic MUD BM (n = 14; two of which were HLA mismatched...

The German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) commissioneda revision of the S2 guidelines on “positioning therapy for prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary function disorders” from 2008. Because of the increasing clinical and scientificrelevance the guidelines were extended to include the issue of “early mobilization”and the following main topics are therefore included: use of positioning therapy and earlymobilization for prophylaxis and therapy of pulmonary function disorders, undesired effects and complications of positioning therapy and early mobilization as well as practical aspects of the use of positioning therapy and early mobilization. These guidelines are the result of a systematic literature search and the subsequent critical evaluation of the evidence with scientific methods. The methodological approach for the process of development of the guidelines followed the requirements of evidence-based medicine, as defined as the standard by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. Recently published articles after 2005 were examined with respect to positioning therapy and the recently accepted aspect of early mobilization incorporates all literature published up to June 2014.

Toxoplasmosis is a rare but often fatal complication that occurs after patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. At our institution, toxoplasmosis was diagnosed in 8 of 301 patients who received stem cell transplants. Disseminated toxoplasmosis with a rapid fatal course was observed in 2 patients. Six patients had cerebral toxoplasmosis diagnosed on the basis of neurological signs and observation of the patients' mental confusion, seizures, and typical lesions (which were assessed by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both). Seroconversion of antitoxoplasma immunoglobulin and a discovery of toxoplasma deoxyribonucleic acid in the cerebrospinal fluid (confirmed by use of polymerase chain reaction) were documented in all patients. Treatment consisted of clindamycin therapy (for 2 patients) and of pyrimethamine-clindamycin therapy, sulfadiazine therapy, or both (for 5 patients). Patients showed improvement after therapy, as assessed by clinical and radiological means. Three of 8 patients survive-1 without any residual neurological symptoms and 2 with minimal neurological symptoms.

No abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a new immunosuppressive drug successfully used in renal and heart transplant recipients, was used in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA), methotrexate (MTX) and prednisolone for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched, unrelated (n = 9) and related donors (n = 4) in an open single-centre phase II study. Thirteen patients, transplanted from HLA-mismatched donors of 18-57 yr of age, received 1 g MMF daily, starting at day 10, in addition to CsA and prednisolone for aGVHD prophylaxis. All patients were engrafted between days 13 and 15. Four of the 13 patients experienced aGVHD grade I/II (n = 2) and grade III (n = 2). All patients except 3 were alive on day 100 post-transplantation. No severe adverse effects of MMF were recorded. In our pilot study, we demonstrated that MMF can be used safely for the prophylaxis of aGVHD.

No abstract

Summary:We report 27 patients with relapsed acute or chronic leukemia who underwent a second hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a related or unrelated donor. Seventeen patients were diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), six with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and four with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Ages ranged from 22 to 49 years (median 37); 13 patients were female and 14 male. Relapse was diagnosed between 1 and 45 months after the first HSCT. Sixteen patients who relapsed had received an autologous transplant initially and 11 an allogeneic transplant. Ten patients relapsed within 6 months and 17 patients later than 6 months. Chemotherapy was used as reinduction for relapse after HSCT in 16 patients who had received an autologous transplant and in three who had received an allogeneic transplant, since the latter did not respond to reduction of immunosuppression to induce a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reaction. Five of these 19 patients (26%) achieved complete remission (CR), seven patients did not respond to chemotherapy and seven achieved a partial remission (PR). The stem cell source for the second HSCT included bone marrow (n = 12) and PBSC (n = 4) from genotypically identical unrelated donors, PBSC (n = 7) and bone marrow (n = 3) from related donors. Currently eight of the 27 patients are alive and diseasefree after the second HSCT. One patient is alive and disease-free after two allogeneic transplants (day +1538), eight patients, who relapsed after an autologous transplant followed by an allogeneic transplant (days +248 to +1140), acute myeloid leukaemia (n = 6) and chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 2) are alive and diseasefree. The overall disease-free survival is 30% (8/27). The overall disease-free survival of autologous transplant patients subsequently undergoing an allogeneic transplant is 43% (P = 0.049). It is suggested that a second HSCT is possible for patients with leukemia relapse following the first autologous transplant. A second transplant might also be offered to patients relapsing after the first allogeneic HSCT. Keywords: second allogeneic bone marrow transplant; conditioning regimen; relapse rate; acute leukemia; diseasefree survivalThe relapse rate in patients transplanted for acute or chronic leukemia still ranges from 20-60%, accounting for one important cause of treatment failure. 1,2 Relapse rate correlates with diagnosis and stage of disease, 3,4 since patients transplanted either in relapse or after chemotherapy induction failure demonstrated a significantly higher risk for relapse compared to patients transplanted in complete remission. 5 The management of patients relapsing after HSCT is still controversial. 6,7 The therapeutic modalities for the treatment of leukemia relapse following allogeneic transplantation have been reviewed recently. [8][9][10] Options such as immunotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or a second allograft after myeloablative conditioning have been explored. 10 Despite the high treatment-related mortality with a second HSC ...

Summary:We compared the outcomes in patients receiving unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCT) with those receiving bone marrow transplants (BMT) in a matched pair analysis. Seventy-four patients with hematological malignancies with HLA-matched (77%) and mismatched (23%) donors were analyzed in this study. Thirty-four patients (45%) were considered as high risk patients. Sixty-eight patients received standard conditioning regimens with Bu/Cy or TBI/Cy. Six patients received an intensified conditioning regimen with the addition of etoposide, thiotepa or melphalan. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of prednisolone, cyclosporine and methotrexate. Groups were matched for patient, donor, transplant characteristics and HLA compatibility. Peripheral blood stem cell collection led to the collection of a higher number of CD34 + and CD3 + cells in comparison to bone marrow collection. Leukocyte engraftment in the PBSCT group occurred in 14 days (median; range 6-26 days) and in the BMT group in 19 days (range 9-29 days; P Ͻ 0.02). The time of platelet engraftment did not differ significantly. The incidence of grades II-lV acute GVHD in the group of HLA-identical patients was 35% in the PBSCT group and 25% in the BMT group (P Ͻ 0.33, log-rank). However, there was a significant difference (P Ͻ 0.05, logrank) in incidence and time to onset of acute GVHD II-IV comparing all patients, including the 17 mismatched transplants. Disease-free survival was 51% (19 patients) with a median of 352 days and 59% (21 patients) with a median of 760 days for PBSC and BMT transplants, respectively. In conclusion, our results indicate that allogeneic PBSCT led to significantly faster leukocyte engraftment but is associated with a higher incidence and more rapid onset of severe acute GVHD comparing all patients, including the 17 mismatched transplants. However, the incidence of severe acute GVHD in HLAidentical patients was not different between the PBSCT and BMT groups. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 27, 27-33.