No abstract

BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a powerful imaging modality to identify and determine the extent of a lesion. In addition, EUS is superior to a computed tomography scan in detecting lesions < 3 cm. The objective of the current study was to determine whether small lesions (≤ 25 mm) affected the specimen adequacy and the diagnostic accuracy for lesions aspirated under EUS guidance. METHODS In the current study, 209 consecutive EUS‐guided fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (EUS‐FNAB) samples ≤ 25 mm (100 samples) or > 25 mm (109 samples) as determined by EUS were obtained from 151 patients with a mean age of 62 years (range, 39–94 years). A cytopathologist present in the endoscopy suite determined specimen adequacy. Yield of adequate samples for diagnosis, number of passes, and operating characteristics of EUS‐FNAB for small (≤ 25 mm) and large lesions (>25 mm) were compared. RESULTS The overall yield of obtaining adequate samples for diagnosis was 96% (201 of 209). There was no difference noted with regard to the yield of obtaining samples (96% vs. 96%) from small or large lesions. A mean of 2.5 passes (range, 1–9 passes) was needed to obtain adequate samples from lesions ≤ 25 mm, whereas a mean of 4.5 passes (range, 1–11 passes) was needed to obtain adequate samples from lesions > 25 mm. The sensitivity (96% vs. 96%), specificity (100% vs. 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (98% vs. 97%) for EUS‐FNAB were comparable whether the lesion was ≤ 25 mm or > 25 mm. CONCLUSIONS EUS‐FNAB was a highly effective technique to obtain samples from small (≤ 25 mm) and large (> 25 mm) lesions without affecting the sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic accuracy. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND The management of foregut duplication cysts is controversial, especially in asymptomatic patients. The safety and accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS‐fine‐needle aspiration EUS‐FNA) in confirming the nature of cysts by using electron microscopy (EM) has not been reported. In this study, the authors describe the utility of demonstrating detached ciliary tufts (DCTs) in the diagnosis of foregut duplication cysts with EUS‐FNA. METHODS Consecutive patients with suspected mediastinal masses or mediastinal cysts on imaging studies were evaluated prospectively by EUS and EUS‐FNA. Cyst fluid was examined by routine cytologic techniques. In two patients, EM was performed to confirm the nature of DCTs. RESULTS Ten consecutive patients were evaluated with EUS and EUS‐FNA. Seventy percent of the cysts were characterized by computed tomography (CT) scans as solid masses. The mean greatest cyst dimension measured 34 mm × 48 mm by EUS. Microscopic examination of the cyst content revealed mucinous material, cellular debris, and DCTs. The latter were seen in routine cytologic preparations and by EM. Patients were followed up to a median of 321 days. Due to EUS‐FNA confirmatory diagnoses of foregut duplication cysts, none of the patients except 1 underwent surgical resection after developing pneumonia 6 months later. Histologic sections of the resected specimen confirmed the presence of (foregut cyst, bronchogenic type). All other patients were asymptomatic. Cysts size and nature did not change on repeated imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS EUS was superior compared with CT scanning in characterizing foregut duplication cysts. EUS‐FNA is safe and accurate in the diagnosis of foregut duplication cysts. The demonstration of DCTs in cyst fluid and the absence of malignant cells confirmed the benign nature of these lesions, allowing conservative and expectant management for these patients. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

The pedunculopontine nucleus is part of the reticular ascending arousal system and is involved in locomotion and sleep. Two patients with Parkinson disease received electrodes that stimulated the pedunculopontine nucleus area to alleviate their severe gait impairment. Instead, we found that low‐frequency stimulation of the pedunculopontine nucleus area increased alertness, whereas high‐frequency stimulation induced non‐rapid eye movement sleep. In addition, the sudden withdrawal of the low‐frequency stimulation was consistently followed by rapid eye movement sleep episodes in 1 patient. These data have the potential to benefit patients who suffer from sleep disorders. ANN NEUROL 2010;67:546–549

The objective of this study is to assess the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancer. The study includes patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our institution for staging of colorectal carcinoma or for evaluation peri-rectal masses or distal metastases from August 2000 to November 2010. We assessed the frequency with which EUS-FNA procedure confirms the diagnosis of malignancy and the percent of cases in which it modifies staging of colorectal carcinoma. Using histology as a reference standard, we also assessed the diagnostic performance. We identified 79 cases of EUS-FNA from 77 patients, mean (SD) age of 60 (12.5), 44 males. Twenty-seven (34%) aspirates were from patients with primary rectal/peri-rectal masses, 15 (19%) were from patients with suspected regional lymph node metastasis, and 37 (47%) were cases of suspected of distal metastasis. All lesions were clinically suspicious for primary or metastatic colorectal carcinoma. On cytologic examinations, 43 (54%) cases were confirmed as malignant, 6 (8%) were benign neoplasms, 4 (5%) were suspicious for malignant neoplasm, 2 (3%) showed atypical cells, and the rest 24 (30%) were negative for neoplasms. Fourteen of 27 (52%) of the local rectal masses were confirmed as colorectal carcinoma. Eleven of 15 (73%) regional lymph nodes were positive for metastasis-all, but two of these metastases, were of colorectal origin. Twenty of 37(54%) distal lesions were metastatic neoplasms and 15 of those were colorectal in origin. Diagnosis of primary colorectal carcinoma was confirmed in 52% of the clinically suspicious primary lesions and in 42% regional or distal metastatic lesions. Using histology as a reference standard in 27 of 79 (29%) cases, we calculated an overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (C.I) of EUS-FNA of 89% (74-100%), 79% (50-100%) 89% (74-100%), and 79% (51-100%). EUS-FNA is useful for assessing primary and metastatic colorectal lesion. This technique improves staging of suspected nodal or distant metastases.