2004
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
122
2
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
122
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 Several studies have looked at the diagnostic yield of EUS with FNA for the diagnosis of GIST. [25][26][27] The sensitivity and diagnostic yield of this technique ranges between 75% and 85%. EUS can also help to identify extramural lesions and differentiate vascular vs. solid lesions.…”
Section: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Several studies have looked at the diagnostic yield of EUS with FNA for the diagnosis of GIST. [25][26][27] The sensitivity and diagnostic yield of this technique ranges between 75% and 85%. EUS can also help to identify extramural lesions and differentiate vascular vs. solid lesions.…”
Section: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem for the diagnosis of GISTs is that conventional endoscopic biopsies using forceps are often unsuccessful in sampling submucosal mass, because they are too superficial and only obtain biopsy samples of the mucosal tissue. EUSguided aspiration or core biopsy for submucosal tumors had a success rate of 60%-70% in the earlier studies, but this rate is now gradually reaching 80%-90%, which is significantly higher than that of a simple endoscopic biopsy [10][11][12] . The usefulness of biopsy in diagnosis can be enhanced by immunohistochemical staining on aspirates or tissues for tumor-specific markers such as CD117 and CD34, which are crucial for a diagnosis of GISTs [13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A few case reports and studies have shown EUS-FNA as a feasible technique for obtaining tissue samples from thickened folds or other lesions within the GI tract wall, especially when endoscopic biopsies are negative. One retrospective study of EUS-FNA in evaluating intramural and extramural GI tract lesions showed the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in diagnosing GI tract neoplastic lesions were 89%, 88%, and 89%, respectively [51]. The staging of PGL is different than for gastric adenocarcinoma and utilizes either the modified Ann Arbor staging system or the modified TNM staging system named the Paris classification [52,53].…”
Section: Infiltrating Gastric Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%