Purpose
The available literature has shown that the presence of an Emergency Medicine Pharmacist (EMP) is associated with decreased time to medication procurement, a reduction in medication errors, and overall cost avoidance. However, there is limited literature that systematically evaluates the impact of EMPs in the treatment of critically ill trauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Methods
This study was a retrospective chart review evaluating 1082 adult patients presenting to the critical care area (CCA) of the ED at the University of Louisville Hospital in Louisville, Kentucky for trauma evaluation from July 2014 to December 2014. The study group consisted of patients presenting to the CCA when an EMP was present. Primary outcomes included time to administration of antibiotics, analgesia medication, sedation medication, rapid sequence intubation (RSI), and anticoagulation reversal. Secondary outcomes included time to administration of appropriate antibiotics at an appropriate dose and vaccination administration.
Results
The presence of an EMP was associated with a statistically significant decreased median time from triage to the administration of an analgesic medication (11 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 8‐27] vs 13 minutes [IQR 8.5‐20], P = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in triage time to antibiotic administration, RSI, sedation medication administration, or anticoagulation reversal. Patients in the EMP group were more likely to receive appropriate empiric antibiotics compared with the control group (80.7% vs 52.2%, P = 0.01).
Conclusion
The presence of an EMP was associated with decreased time to analgesia medication administration as well as an increased likelihood of the administration of appropriate empiric antibiotics in critically ill trauma patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.