Abstract:Purpose
The available literature has shown that the presence of an Emergency Medicine Pharmacist (EMP) is associated with decreased time to medication procurement, a reduction in medication errors, and overall cost avoidance. However, there is limited literature that systematically evaluates the impact of EMPs in the treatment of critically ill trauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Methods
This study was a retrospective chart review evaluating 1082 adult patients presenting to the critic… Show more
“…The PI enhancements in this report build upon prior quality improvement descriptions of critical care pharmacists 22–28 . The pharmacist‐led MMI program is a unique approach that teaches residents and preceptors the medication use process and how to lead positive, systems‐based PI 10,14–16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PI enhancements in this report build upon prior quality improvement descriptions of critical care pharmacists. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The pharmacist-led MMI program is a unique approach that teaches residents and preceptors the medication use process and how to lead positive, systems-based PI. 30,39 This theory supports why the most common level of reliability was 1 across all critical care MMI events, but improved to IHI level 2 reliability for EMR enhancements, that is, standardized, directed actions that mitigate human-based factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guiding organizations, including the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), American Society of Health‐Systems Pharmacists (ASHP), and Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), have highlighted the role of hospital pharmacists as medical safety leaders through direct and indirect patient care including rounds, protocol and clinical pathway development, formulary review, quality improvement, and leveraging technology 14–17,21 . Numerous studies have documented the role of critical care pharmacists as patient safety leaders 22–28 . The SCCM, ACCP Critical Care Practice and Research Network, and ASHP joint position paper describe several foundational activities critical care pharmacists should perform around medication safety quality improvement, but MMI programs are not included 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17]21 Numerous studies have documented the role of critical care pharmacists as patient safety leaders. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The SCCM, ACCP Critical Care Practice and Research Network, and ASHP joint position paper describe several foundational activities critical care pharmacists should perform around medication safety quality improvement, but MMI programs are not included. 16 Studies documenting the impact of specific pharmacist-led MMI programs on improved medication safety practices are needed.…”
Pharmacy‐led morbidity, mortality, and improvement (MMI) programs enhance practitioner education and improve patient‐safety culture. The impact of MMI programs on process improvement (PI) outcomes is lacking, particularly within critical care. The purpose of this retrospective report was to describe PI interventions from critical care medication errors evaluated through a pharmacy MMI program. Medication errors reported between June 2013 and August 2022 that occurred in an intensive care unit, emergency department, or procedural area were included. Error severity and potential were assessed using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Medication Error Index and Harm Associated with Medication Error Classification (HAMEC), respectively. The primary outcome of PI interventions was classified as clinical update, operations change, pharmacy or hospital administration change, and/or informatics and technology (IT) updates. Electronic medical record (EMR) were further classified as best practice advisory, medication order build/change, order set build/change, dose limit/alert, or infusion smart pump change. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) reliability level was evaluated as a secondary outcome. A total of 54 errors were included. Most errors were classified as NCC MERP category D (13 [24.1%]) and C (12 [22.2%]) with severe harm potential (HAMEC 4, 26 [48.1%]; median score 3 [interquartile range, IQR, 3–4]) error potential. A total of 88 PI interventions were identified (median 1.5 [IQR 1–2] per error); clinical (30 [34.1%]) and IT (26 [29.5%]) updates were the most common. Order set build or change (20 [45.5%]) was the most common EMR enhancement. PI interventions were a median IHI level 1 reliability (IQR, 1–2). EMR enhancements had a median IHI level of reliability of 2 (IQR, 1–2). Critical care medication errors addressed through a formal Pharmacy MMI program have high harm potential and often involve multiple PI interventions. EMR interventions generally had higher levels of empiric reliability.
“…The PI enhancements in this report build upon prior quality improvement descriptions of critical care pharmacists 22–28 . The pharmacist‐led MMI program is a unique approach that teaches residents and preceptors the medication use process and how to lead positive, systems‐based PI 10,14–16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PI enhancements in this report build upon prior quality improvement descriptions of critical care pharmacists. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The pharmacist-led MMI program is a unique approach that teaches residents and preceptors the medication use process and how to lead positive, systems-based PI. 30,39 This theory supports why the most common level of reliability was 1 across all critical care MMI events, but improved to IHI level 2 reliability for EMR enhancements, that is, standardized, directed actions that mitigate human-based factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guiding organizations, including the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), American Society of Health‐Systems Pharmacists (ASHP), and Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), have highlighted the role of hospital pharmacists as medical safety leaders through direct and indirect patient care including rounds, protocol and clinical pathway development, formulary review, quality improvement, and leveraging technology 14–17,21 . Numerous studies have documented the role of critical care pharmacists as patient safety leaders 22–28 . The SCCM, ACCP Critical Care Practice and Research Network, and ASHP joint position paper describe several foundational activities critical care pharmacists should perform around medication safety quality improvement, but MMI programs are not included 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17]21 Numerous studies have documented the role of critical care pharmacists as patient safety leaders. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The SCCM, ACCP Critical Care Practice and Research Network, and ASHP joint position paper describe several foundational activities critical care pharmacists should perform around medication safety quality improvement, but MMI programs are not included. 16 Studies documenting the impact of specific pharmacist-led MMI programs on improved medication safety practices are needed.…”
Pharmacy‐led morbidity, mortality, and improvement (MMI) programs enhance practitioner education and improve patient‐safety culture. The impact of MMI programs on process improvement (PI) outcomes is lacking, particularly within critical care. The purpose of this retrospective report was to describe PI interventions from critical care medication errors evaluated through a pharmacy MMI program. Medication errors reported between June 2013 and August 2022 that occurred in an intensive care unit, emergency department, or procedural area were included. Error severity and potential were assessed using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Medication Error Index and Harm Associated with Medication Error Classification (HAMEC), respectively. The primary outcome of PI interventions was classified as clinical update, operations change, pharmacy or hospital administration change, and/or informatics and technology (IT) updates. Electronic medical record (EMR) were further classified as best practice advisory, medication order build/change, order set build/change, dose limit/alert, or infusion smart pump change. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) reliability level was evaluated as a secondary outcome. A total of 54 errors were included. Most errors were classified as NCC MERP category D (13 [24.1%]) and C (12 [22.2%]) with severe harm potential (HAMEC 4, 26 [48.1%]; median score 3 [interquartile range, IQR, 3–4]) error potential. A total of 88 PI interventions were identified (median 1.5 [IQR 1–2] per error); clinical (30 [34.1%]) and IT (26 [29.5%]) updates were the most common. Order set build or change (20 [45.5%]) was the most common EMR enhancement. PI interventions were a median IHI level 1 reliability (IQR, 1–2). EMR enhancements had a median IHI level of reliability of 2 (IQR, 1–2). Critical care medication errors addressed through a formal Pharmacy MMI program have high harm potential and often involve multiple PI interventions. EMR interventions generally had higher levels of empiric reliability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.