The in vivo T cell response to persistent Ag contains a hyporesponsive phase following an initial expansion and subsequent partial deletion of the responding cells. The mechanism(s) responsible for this tolerance process is poorly understood. In this study, we describe a new paired transgenic model (TCR and Ag), which within 7–14 days produces 20–40 million hyporesponsive T cells. This state is characterized by an 85–95% reduction in all cytokine production, an impairment of re-expression of CD25 and CD69, and a desensitization of the proliferative response to Ag. TCR levels were normal, and in vivo mixing experiments showed no evidence for active suppression. The hyporesponsiveness partially dissipated without proliferation when the cells were transferred into a non-Ag-bearing host. If the second host expressed Ag, the T cells initially regained responsiveness, but then slowly entered an even deeper state of tolerance characterized by an additional 7- to 10-fold lowering of cytokine production and a greater desensitization of proliferation. Surprisingly, this readaptation took place with the same level of Ag presentation, suggesting that other parameters can influence the tolerance threshold. Both the readjustment in sensitivity and the reversal without Ag convincingly demonstrate for the first time a truly adaptive tolerance process in CD4+ T cells in vivo.
Adaptive tolerance is a process by which T cells become desensitized when Ag stimulation persists following an initial immune response in vivo. To examine the biochemical changes in TCR signaling present in this state, we used a mouse model in which Rag2−/− TCR-transgenic CD4+ T cells were transferred into CD3ε−/− recipients expressing their cognate Ag. Compared with naive T cells, adaptively tolerant T cells had normal levels of TCR and slightly increased levels of CD4. Following activation with anti-TCR and anti-CD4 mAbs, the predominant signaling block in the tolerant cells was at the level of Zap70 kinase activity, which was decreased 75% in vitro. Phosphorylations of the Zap70 substrates (linker of activated T cells and phospholipase Cγ1 were also profoundly diminished. This proximal defect impacted mostly on the calcium/NFAT and NF-κB pathways, with only a modest decrease in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. This state was contrasted with T cell clonal anergy in which the RAS/MAPK pathway was preferentially impaired and there was much less inhibition of Zap70 kinase activity. Both hyporesponsive states manifested a block in IκB degradation. These results demonstrate that T cell adaptive tolerance and clonal anergy are distinct biochemical states, possibly providing T cells with two molecular mechanisms to curtail responsiveness in different biological circumstances.
Recent experiments have suggested that the IL‐2 locus is monoallelically expressed. We tested this hypothesis using TCR‐transgenic mice carrying one inactivated IL‐2 allele. The frequency in single‐cell assays of IL‐2‐producing cells following optimal stimulation by antigen and antigen‐presenting cells was equivalent to that from wild‐type mice, but the amount of IL‐2 produced per cell was twofold less. Similar observations were made by intracellular staining for IL‐2, although stimulation in bulk culture was less optimal, showing only a 1.7‐fold difference. Importantly, the frequency of responding cells from the heterozygotes was less than from the wild‐type mice if the IL‐2 assay was performed after only 24 – 30 h of activation, suggesting that the targeted allele could compete with the normal allele early after stimulation and give the misimpression that the heterozygotes had fewer IL‐2‐producing cells. These data strongly argue that the IL‐2 locus can be expressed biallelically under optimum stimulation conditions.
In this report we extend the in vitro clonal anergy model to examine the regulation of proliferation in T cells that secrete both IL-2 and IL-4. Newly cloned Ag-specific murine T cells are shown to depend on both IL-2 and IL-4 synthesis for maximal proliferation. Whereas IL-2 responsiveness is constitutive in these cells, IL-4 responsiveness develops only after Ag and APC stimulation. Remarkably, proliferation of these cells to Ag is sensitive to inhibition by clonal anergy, even though IL-4 synthesis remains inducible. Anergy in these cells is associated with an inability to respond to IL-4, in addition to the development of an IL-2 production defect. The results suggest that anergy induction may be capable of preventing the clonal expansion of autoreactive T cells producing both IL-2 and IL-4 in vivo.
Resting T lymphocytes proliferate in response to a combination of a calcium ionophore and a phorbol ester. This observation suggests that an increase in intracellular calcium free ion concentration [Ca2+]i and activation of protein kinase C (PKC) are sufficient signaling events for the initiation of T cell proliferation. In contrast, an accessory cell-generated costimulatory signal, acting independently of the rise in [Ca2+]i and PKC activation, is required for Ag-induced proliferation of type I T cell clones. We now report that this costimulatory signal is unexpectedly also being delivered via a cell-cell interaction during the response to ionomycin and phorbol ester. In the absence of this signal (at limiting cell numbers), T cells fail to divide. We also demonstrate that proliferation in response to immobilized anti-CD3 mAb requires the cell-cell interaction. These results suggest a model of T cell stimulation in which activation of a costimulatory signaling pathway is important in the regulation of the IL-2 gene, and only in the presence of this (third) signal can an increase in [Ca2+]i and PKC activity induce T cell proliferation. Such a model predicts that IL-2-dependent expansion of T cell clones in vivo in response to Ag receptor occupancy requires the delivery of an independent accessory cell-derived co-stimulatory signal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.