No abstract

BackgroundEfficacy of vaccines and disease activity linked to immunization are major concerns among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).ObjectiveTo assess antibody responses to seasonal influenza antigens and vaccine-associated neuroaxonal damage utilizing serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in pwMS receiving dimethyl fumarate (DMF).MethodsIn this prospective study, the 2020/2021 seasonal tetravalent influenza vaccine was administered to 20 pwMS treated with DMF and 15 healthy controls (HCs). The primary endpoints were responder rate of strain-specific antibody production (seroconversion or significant (4-fold) increase in influenza-antibody titers for ≥2/4 strains) at 30 days post-vaccination and changes in sNfL levels.ResultsAll patients treated with DMF fulfilled the responder criteria for immunization compared with 53% of the controls. However, higher proportions of HCs already had influenza-antibody titers ≥1:40 at baseline (53% vs. 41%, p = 0.174). sNfL levels were comparable among both groups at baseline and did not increase 34 days after vaccination. In addition, no clinical or radiological disease reactivation was found.ConclusionDMF-treated patients mount an adequate humoral immune response to influenza vaccines. Within the limits of the small cohort investigated, our data suggest that influenza immunization is not associated with clinical or subclinical disease reactivation.

The Casper carotid stent demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of carotid stenosis, with no technical failures and no adverse neurological events seen throughout the 90 day follow-up period. Its double layer structure seems to combine adequate plaque scaffolding with high vessel adaptability.

Here, we report on a 28-year old male patient presenting with neck and shoulder pain, dysesthesia of all four limbs and hypesthesia of both hands, without motor deficits. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an intradural, intramedullary mass of the cervical spinal cord of 6.4 cm length and 1.7 cm diameter. The patient underwent surgical resection. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation showed pleomorphic glial tumor cells, mitoses, calcifications, and atypical ganglioid cells compatible with the morphology of anaplastic ganglioglioma (WHO Grade III). Extensive molecular workup revealed H3F3A K27M, TERT C228T and PDGFRα Y849C mutations indicating poor prognosis. The H3F3A K27M mutation assigned the tumor to the molecular group of diffuse midline glioma (WHO Grade IV). Epigenome-wide methylation profiling confirmed the methylation class of diffuse midline glioma. Thus, this is a very rare case of malignant glioma with H3 K27M genotype phenotypically mimicking anaplastic ganglioglioma. This case emphasizes the importance of comprehensive morphological and molecular workup including methylome profiling for advanced patient care.

No abstract

Background and PurposeDistinction between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and status epilepticus (SE) on MRI can be challenging as restricted diffusion may occur in both conditions. In this study, we aimed to test a tool, which could help in differentiating AIS from SE when restricted diffusion was present on MRI.Materials and MethodsIn diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with a b-value of 1,000 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, we compared the ratios of intensities of gray values of diffusion-restricted lesions to the healthy mirror side in patients with AIS and SE. Patients were recruited prospectively between February 2019 and October 2021. All patients underwent MRI and EEG within the first 48 h of symptom onset.ResultsWe identified 26 patients with SE and 164 patients with AIS. All patients had diffusion-restricted lesions with a hyperintensity in DWI and ADC signal decrease. Diffusion restriction was significantly more intense in patients with AIS as compared to patients with SE. The median ratios of intensities of gray values of diffusion-restricted lesions to the healthy mirror side for DWI were 1.42 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.32–1.47) in SE and 1.67 (IQR 1.49–1.90) in AIS (p < 0.001). ADC decrease was more significant in AIS as compared to SE with median ratios of 0.80 (IQR 0.72–0.89) vs. 0.61 (IQR 0.50–0.71), respectively (p < 0.001). A cutoff value for ratios of DWI signal was 1.495 with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 85%. Values lower than 1.495 were more likely to be associated with SE and higher values were with AIS. A cutoff value for ADC ratios was 0.735 with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 84%. Values lower than 0.735 were more likely to be associated with AIS and higher values were with SE.ConclusionDiffusion restriction and ADC decrease were significantly more intense in patients with AIS as compared to SE. Therefore, quantitative analysis of diffusion restriction may be a helpful tool for differentiating between AIS and SE when restricted diffusion is present on MRI.

Here, we report on a patient presenting with two histopathologically distinct gliomas. At the age of 42, the patient underwent initial resection of a right temporal oligodendroglioma IDH mutated 1p/19q co-deleted WHO Grade II followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. 15 months after initial diagnosis, the patient showed right hemispheric tumor progression and an additional new left frontal contrast enhancement in the subsequent imaging. A re-resection of the right-sided tumor and resection of the left frontal tumor were conducted. Neuropathological work-up showed recurrence of the right-sided oligodendroglioma with features of an anaplastic oligodendroglioma WHO Grade III, but a glioblastoma WHO grade IV for the left frontal lesion. In depth molecular profiling revealed two independent brain tumors with distinct molecular profiles of anaplastic oligodendroglioma IDH mutated 1p/19q co-deleted WHO Grade III and glioblastoma IDH wildtype WHO grade IV. This unique and rare case of a patient with two independent brain tumors revealed by in-depth molecular work-up and epigenomic profiling emphasizes the importance of integrated work-up of brain tumors including methylome profiling for advanced patient care.

No abstract