Background: Patient safety is a key target in public health, health services and medicine. Communication between all parties involved in gynecology and obstetrics (clinical staff/professionals, expectant mothers/patients and their partners, close relatives or friends providing social support) should be improved to ensure patient safety, including the avoidance of preventable adverse events (pAEs). Therefore, interventions including an app will be developed in this project through a participatory approach integrating two theoretical models. The interventions will be designed to support participants in their communication with each other and to overcome difficulties in everyday hospital life. The aim is to foster effective communication in order to reduce the frequency of pAEs. If communication is improved, clinical staff should show an increase in work satisfaction and patients should show an increase in patient satisfaction. Methods: The study will take place in two maternity clinics in Germany. In line with previous studies of complex interventions, it is divided into three interdependent phases. Each phase provides its own methods and data. Phase 1: Needs assessment and a training for staff (n = 140) tested in a pre-experimental study with a pre/post-design. Phase 2: Assessment of communication training for patients and their social support providers (n = 423) in a randomized controlled study. Phase 3: Assessment of an app supporting the communication between staff, patients, and their social support providers (n = 423) in a case-control study. The primary outcome is improvement of communication competencies. A range of other implementation outcomes will also be assessed (i.e. pAEs, patient/treatment satisfaction, work satisfaction, safety culture, training-related outcomes). Discussion: This is the first large intervention study on communication and patient safety in gynecology and obstetrics integrating two theoretical models that have not been applied to this setting. It is expected that the interventions, including the app, will improve communication practice which is linked to a lower probability of pAEs. The app will offer an effective and inexpensive way to promote effective communication independent of users' motivation. Insights gained from this study can inform other patient safety interventions and health policy developments.

COVID‐19 restrictions such as lockdowns or quarantines may increase the risk for social isolation and perceived loneliness. The mechanisms can be modeled by Cacioppo's Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness (ETL), which predicts that a lack of perceived social connectedness may lead, in the long‐term, to mental and physical health consequences. However, the association between COVID‐19 pandemic distress, mental health, and loneliness is not sufficiently understood. The present longitudinal study examined the relationship between distress and depression, and the mediating effects of anxiety and loneliness in a German rehabilitation sample ( N = 403) at two timepoints (≤6 weeks pre‐rehabilitation; ≥12 weeks post‐rehabilitation; mean time between T1 and T2 was  52 days). Change scores between T1 and T2 were examined for the variables COVID‐19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI), anxiety, loneliness, and depression. The results of the serial mediation analysis indicated that anxiety and loneliness were able to explain the relationship between distress and depression with 42% of variance in depression accounted for. Findings extend research on the relationship between COVID‐19 and mental health by considering anxiety and loneliness as sustaining factors of depressive symptoms, thus, successfully applying the ETL. Results stress the necessity to consider anxiety and loneliness in the treatment or prevention of depression.

(1) Background: Obstetric work requires good communication, which can be trained through interventions targeting healthcare providers and pregnant women/patients. This systematic review aims to aggregate the current state of research on communication interventions in obstetrics. (2) Methods: Using the PICOS scheme, we searched for studies published in peer-reviewed journals in English or German between 2000 and 2020. Out of 7018 results, 71 studies were included and evaluated in this synthesis using the Oxford Level of Evidence Scale. (3) Results: The 63 studies that included a communication component revealed a positive effect on different proximal outcomes (i.e., communication skills). Three studies revealed a beneficial effect of communication trainings on distal performance indicators (i.e., patient safety), but only to a limited extent. Most studies simultaneously examined different groups, however, those addressing healthcare providers were more common than those with students (61 vs. 12). Only nine studies targeted expectant mothers. Overall, the evidence level of studies was low (only 11 RCTs), with 24 studies with an evidence level I-II, 35 with level III, and 10 with level IV. (4) Conclusions: Communication trainings should be more frequently applied to improve communication of staff, students, and pregnant women and their partners, thereby improving patient safety.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Soziale Isolation ist ein Risikofaktor für Einsamkeit und damit für gesundheitliche Beeinträchtigungen. Veränderungen im Zusammenhang mit der Coronapandemie in Deutschland gilt es besser zu verstehen. Fragestellung Ziel der Studie war es, Einsamkeit und assoziierte Faktoren vor und während der Coronapandemie in Deutschland systematisch zu untersuchen. Die Fragestellungen waren: 1. Wie einsam fühlen sich Menschen vor und während der Coronapandemie? 2. Wie viele Menschen fühlen sich seit Beginn der Coronapandemie einsamer? 3. Wie viele Menschen berichten über gesundheitliche Belastungen während der Coronapandemie? Material und Methoden Im Jahr 2019 (vor der Coronapandemie) wurden 1003 und im Jahr 2020 (während der Coronapandemie) 1050 Erwachsene online befragt (51 % Frauen; 18–90 Jahre). Ergebnisse Es fühlten sich 10,8 % vs. 26,6 % der Befragten vor bzw. seit der Coronapandemie mehrfach pro Woche oder täglich einsam. Alleinlebende, Frauen und Jüngere fühlten sich häufiger einsam. Seit der Coronapandemie fühlten sich 30,8 % einsamer, v. a. Jüngere. Von starken gesundheitlichen Belastungen berichteten 18,9 %, dies hing mit jüngerem Alter, verschiedenen Sorgen/Ängsten und Einsamkeit zusammen. Diskussion Die höhere Ausprägung der Einsamkeit und Sorgen während der Coronapandemie sollte bei verhaltensbezogenen Maßnahmen zur Prävention der psychischen und körperlichen Beeinträchtigungen sowie behördlichen Maßnahmen berücksichtigt werden. Jüngere Menschen und Alleinlebende könnten profitieren, indem sie zu gezielten Bewältigungsstrategien (z. B. angemessener Nutzung digitaler Medien) ermutigt werden.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hygiene behaviors such as keeping distance, avoiding masses, wearing face masks, and complying with hand hygiene recommendations became imperative. The current study aims to determine factors interrelating with hygiene behaviors. Methods: A total of 4049 individuals (1305 male, 2709 female, aged 18–80 years) were recruited from rehabilitation clinics or freely on the internet. They were surveyed via online questionnaires between May 2020 and August 2021. Sociodemographics, hygiene behaviors, and fear of COVID-19 infection were assessed. Results: Overall prevalence for hygiene behaviors was: keeping a distance—88.1%; avoiding mass gatherings—88.0%; wearing face masks—96.9%; and hand hygiene—81.6%, with 70% of the study participants complying with all four researched behaviors. Hygiene behaviors were significantly related to fear in a linear and quadratic fashion. Conclusion: Patients are more compliant according to their self-reported responses than the general population. To improve hygiene behavior, hand hygiene in particular provides options for improvements. A medium level of fear seems to be more functional than too-elevated fear. Behavioral interventions and targeted communication aiming at improving different behaviors in orchestration can help individuals to protect their health and to remain healthy. Accordingly, communication is required to ensure high hygiene standards and patient safety, and to prevent adverse effects.

BackgroundHuman failure and a lack of effective communication are the main reasons for preventable adverse events, compromising patient safety in obstetrics. In order to improve safety, team and communication interventions have been implemented but lack feasibility in obstetric care. Psychological models such as the health action process approach might help to improve interventions.MethodsIn a cross-sectional online survey with N = 129 healthcare workers (Study 1) and a paper-pencil survey with N = 137 obstetric healthcare workers at two obstetric university hospitals (Study 2), associations of social-cognitive variables were tested in a path analysis and a multiple regression. Preliminary results informed a communication training for all obstetric healthcare workers. A repeated-measures MANOVA was used to compare pre- and post-intervention data.ResultsSocial-cognitive variables were associated according to model suggestions (β = –0.26 to 0.45, p < 0.05) except for planning in the first study. Triggers of adverse events were associated (β = –0.41 to 0.24, p < 0.05) with communication behavior (Study 2), action self-efficacy and planning (Study 1), as well as barriers to effective communication (both studies). The intervention was rated positively (M = 3.3/4). Afterward, fewer triggers were reported and coping self-efficacy increased. There were group differences regarding hospital, experience, and time.DiscussionThe health action process approach was examined in the context of safe communication in obstetrics and can be used to inform interventions. A theory-based, short training was feasible and acceptable. Perceived patient safety improved but communication behavior did not. Future research should aim to test a more comprehensive psychological communication intervention in a thorough RCT design.

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic has largely affected people's mental health and psychological well-being. Specifically, individuals with a pre-existing mental health disorder seem more impaired by lockdown measures posing as major stress factors. Medical rehabilitation treatment can help people cope with these stressors. The internet and digital apps provide a platform to contribute to regular treatment and to conduct research on this topic.Objective: Making use of internet-based assessments, this study investigated individuals from the general population and patients from medical, psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics. Levels of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and perceived stress during the COVID-19 pandemic, common COVID-19-related worries, and the intention to use digital apps were compared. Furthermore, we investigated whether participating in internet-delivered digital trainings prior to and during patients' rehabilitation stay, as well as the perceived usefulness of digital trainings, were associated with improved mental health after rehabilitation. Methods: A large-scale, online, cross-sectional study was conducted among a study sample taken from the general population (N=1812) in Germany from May 2020 to April 2021. Further, a longitudinal study was conducted making use of the internet among a second study sample of psychosomatic rehabilitation patients at two measurement time points-before (N=1719) and after (n=738) rehabilitation-between July 2020 and April 2021. Validated questionnaires and adapted items were used to assess mental health and COVID-19-related worries. Digital trainings were evaluated. Propensity score matching, multivariate analyses of covariance, an exploratory factor analysis, and hierarchical regression analyses were performed.Results: Patients from the psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics reported increased symptoms with regard to depression, anxiety, loneliness, and stress (F 4,2028 =183.74, P<.001, η 2 p =0.27) compared to the general population. Patients perceived greater satisfaction in communication with health care professionals (F 1,837 =31.67, P<.001, η 2 p =0.04), had lower financial worries (F 1,837 =38.96, P<.001, η 2 p =0.04), but had higher household-related worries (F 1,837 =5.34, P=.02, η 2 p =0.01) compared to the general population. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and perceived stress were lower postrehabilitation (F 1,712 =23.21, P<.001, η 2 p =0.04) than prior to rehabilitation. Psychosomatic patients reported a higher intention to use common apps and digital trainings (F 3,2021 =51.41, P<.001, η 2 p =0.07) than the general population. With regard to digital trainings offered prior to and during the rehabilitation stay, the perceived usefulness of digital trainings on rehabilitation goals was associated with decreased symptoms of depression (β=-.14, P<.001), anxiety (β=-.12, P<.001), loneliness (β=-.18, P<.001), and stress postrehabilitation (β=-.19, P<.001). Participation in digital group therapy for depression was associated with an overall change...

Zusammenfassung Ziel der Studie Die COVID-19-Pandemie erfordert zur Eindämmung Maßnahmen wie Kontaktbeschränkungen und Hygieneregeln und verursacht neben psychischen Problemen auch die Angst vor einer Ansteckung oder einem schweren Verlauf von COVID-19. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht den Zusammenhang zwischen der Angst vor einer Ansteckung und dem Einhalten von Hygieneregeln und der Inanspruchnahme medizinischer Versorgung. Methodik Es wurden 1005 Patienten (20–79 Jahre, 626=62,4% weiblich) vor Antritt einer psychosomatischen Rehabilitationsmaßnahme mittels Online-Fragebogen befragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte deskriptiv, korrelativ und über Varianzanalysen. Ergebnisse 68,6% hatten selten/manchmal und 17,9% hatten immer Angst vor einer Ansteckung mit dem Coronavirus oder vor einem schweren Verlauf der Krankheit. Wer oft/immer Angst hatte, beabsichtigte sich die Hände häufiger zu waschen (97,2%), als diejenigen, die nie Angst hatten. Unabhängig von einer Veränderung des körperlichen und psychischen Gesundheitszustandes waren die Patienten bereit, Hygienemaßnahmen einzuhalten. Jedoch hing mehr Angst vor Ansteckung mit mehr Risikowahrnehmung zusammen, medizinische Versorgung in Anspruch zu nehmen. Bedenken waren bei den Patienten am stäksten ausgeprägt, die einen verschlechterten Gesundheitszustand berichteten. Schlussfolgerung Die Absicht des Befolgens der Hygieneregeln ist bei psychisch vorerkrankten Menschen abhängig von einer vorbestehenden Angst, sich selber oder andere mit dem Coronavirus anzustecken bzw. an einer schweren Verlaufsform zu erkranken. Insbesondere psychisch bzw. psychosomatisch vorerkrankte Menschen müssen adäquat über das Coronavirus und die notwendigen individuellen Schutzmaßnahmen informiert werden, um Ängste zu reduzieren und um die Bereitschaft zu steigern, medizinische Hilfe in Anspruch zu nehmen.