EVERE SEPSIS, A SYNDROME OF acute infection complicated by organ dysfunction, is caused by a dysregulated systemic inflammatory response. Sepsis can progress to systemic hypotension (septic shock), Importance Eritoran is a synthetic lipid A antagonist that blocks lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from binding at the cell surface MD2-TLR4 receptor. LPS is a major component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria and is a potent activator of the acute inflammatory response. Objective To determine if eritoran, a TLR4 antagonist, would significantly reduce sepsis-induced mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial in 197 intensive care units. Patients were enrolled from June 2006 to September 2010 and final follow-up was completed in September 2011. Interventions Patients with severe sepsis (n=1961) were randomized and treated within 12 hours of onset of first organ dysfunction in a 2:1 ratio with a 6-day course of either eritoran tetrasodium (105 mg total) or placebo, with n=1304 and n=657 patients, respectively. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary end points were all-cause mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months after beginning treatment. Results Baseline characteristics of the 2 study groups were similar. In the modified intent-to-treat analysis (randomized patients who received at least 1 dose) there was no significant difference in the primary end point of 28-day all-cause mortality with 28.1% (366/1304) in the eritoran group vs 26.9% (177/657) in the placebo group (P=.59; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.88-1.26; difference in mortality rate, Ϫ1.1; 95% CI, Ϫ5.3 to 3.1) or in the key secondary end point of 1-year all-cause mortality with 44.1% (290/657) in the eritoran group vs 43.3% (565/1304) in the placebo group, Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to death by 1 year, P=.79 (hazard ratio, 0.98; 0.85-1.13). No significant differences were observed in any of the prespecified subgroups. Adverse events, including secondary infection rates, did not differ between study groups. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with severe sepsis, the use of eritoran, compared with placebo, did not result in reduced 28-day mortality.

Two doses of dalbavancin (1000 mg given on day 1 followed by 500 mg given on day 8) were as well tolerated and as effective as linezolid given twice daily for 14 days for the treatment of patients with complicated SSSI, including those infected with MRSA.

rPAF-AH was well tolerated and not antigenic, but did not decrease 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis.

This open-label trial of intravenous peramivir in subjects hospitalized predominantly with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) demonstrated that once- or twice-daily administration was associated with decreases in viral shedding and clinical improvement. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00957996.

The effect of a multiple-dose regimen of oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg every 12 h for 11 doses) on the clearance and steady-state concentrations of theophylline in trough (predose) serum was evaluated in nine healthy male subjects, each serving as his own control. Theophylline was taken as a sustained release tablet per os in a dose of 200 mg every 12 h for 19 doses. Theophylline concentrations in serum were measured immediately before each theophylline dose. Ciprofloxacin was administered on study day 4 through the first dose of study day 8. Theophylline concentrations in serum were also measured on study days 3, 6, 8, and 10 at the following times after the first dose of each day: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h. Steady-state theophylline concentrations in trough serum were significantly higher during ciprofloxacin treatment (day 8) than before (day 3) or after (day 10) ciprofloxacin administration (P < 0.01). Likewise, theophylline clearance was significantly slower (P < 0.01) during ciprofloxacin treatment (day 8) than before it (day 3) or after it (day 10). The magnitude of ciprofloxacin-induced changes was approximately 30%. These results suggest that a multidose regimen of ciprofloxacin significantly slows the clearance of theophylline and elevates theophylline concentrations in serum.

1. Single sample clearance estimates (CL/F) of orally administered ethosuximide were obtained in four groups of healthy adult subjects. One group was treated with phenobarbital to induce CYP2B/2C and CYP3A activity; one group was treated with rifampin to induce CYP3A activity; one group consisted of cigarette smokers (increased CYP1A activity), and one group was untreated (controls). Ethosuximide CL/F values were slightly, though not significantly, increased among cigarette smokers (12.5% increase) and the phenobarbital group (25% increase), but rifampin treatment resulted in a significant increase (65%). 2. The influence of rifampin treatment on the single sample oral clearances of antipyrine, theophylline, phenytoin, carbamazepine, ethosuximide, quinidine, valproic acid, and lorazepam was investigated to determine whether rifampin induces only CYP3A. Rifampin treatment significantly increased the oral clearance of each drug from 1.4-fold (valproic acid) to 3.4-fold (quinidine). These findings indicate that the inductive effect of rifampin extends well beyond CYP3A.

This report summarizes the experience of investigators in four medical centres who compared the combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam against gentamicin/clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. One hundred and fifty-two patients were enrolled in the study and all were evaluable for safety and tolerance, 110 were evaluable for efficacy. Of the 76 patients (49 male, 27 female) treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam 66 (86.8%) were cured, five (6.6%) improved and five (6.6%) failed to respond to treatment. Of 34 patients treated with gentamicin/clindamycin, 21 (61.8%) were cured, four (11.8%) improved and nine (26.4%) failed. Cure rates for patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam were significantly higher than those of patients receiving gentamicin/clindamycin (P less than 0.006). Failures in both groups were attributable in part to pseudomonal and enterococcal infection and abscess formation. The addition of sulbactam to cefoperazone rendered cefoperazone-resistant organisms susceptible to cefoperazone in 11 of the 76 cases (14.4%) and thus permitted treatment with this agent. The present study confirms the safety and clinical efficacy of cefoperazone/sulbactam and suggests that this combination is a viable alternative to an aminoglycoside plus clindamycin for intra-abdominal infections.

This study was undertaken to determine whether rofecoxib can interfere with CYP1A2 activity in humans using theophylline as a probe substrate. Single oral doses of theophylline were administered to each of three panels of 12 healthy subjects receiving daily doses of rofecoxib for 7 days to examine the effect of rofecoxib administration on the absorption and disposition of theophylline. Each panel was administered doses of 12.5, 25, or 50 mg of rofecoxib or a matching placebo in a two-way, randomized, crossover fashion and administered a single oral 300-mg dose of theophylline on day 7 of rofecoxib or placebo administration. Plasma concentrations of theophylline were monitored for 48 hours postdose to assess differences in pharmacokinetics. All three commercially marketed doses of rofecoxib were found to slow the clearance of theophylline with no detectable effect on absorption. CL/F values for theophylline were estimated from AUC infinity and by point estimates from the concentrations of drug in plasma at 12 and 24 hours postdose. The point estimates of CL/F were found to be in agreement with those derived from AUC.