2013
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.2194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Eritoran, an Antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis

Abstract: EVERE SEPSIS, A SYNDROME OF acute infection complicated by organ dysfunction, is caused by a dysregulated systemic inflammatory response. Sepsis can progress to systemic hypotension (septic shock), Importance Eritoran is a synthetic lipid A antagonist that blocks lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from binding at the cell surface MD2-TLR4 receptor. LPS is a major component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria and is a potent activator of the acute inflammatory response. Objective To determine if eritoran, a T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
446
4
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 647 publications
(460 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(48 reference statements)
4
446
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that at this time, general or specific interventions can be implemented to avert SIRS. Although targeted therapies such as specific TLR4 inhibitors did not alter outcomes in patients with severe sepsis, 26,27 this may be due to the fact that patients were already critically unwell and at advanced stages of SIRS when given a TLR4 antagonist. We hypothesise that treating patients with TLR4 inhibitors or agents that impair signalling through TLR5 or NF-kB may provide therapeutic benefit before the clinical manifestations of SIRS or sepsis become apparent.…”
Section: Patients Who Develop Sirs Have a Greater Proportion Of Cd14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that at this time, general or specific interventions can be implemented to avert SIRS. Although targeted therapies such as specific TLR4 inhibitors did not alter outcomes in patients with severe sepsis, 26,27 this may be due to the fact that patients were already critically unwell and at advanced stages of SIRS when given a TLR4 antagonist. We hypothesise that treating patients with TLR4 inhibitors or agents that impair signalling through TLR5 or NF-kB may provide therapeutic benefit before the clinical manifestations of SIRS or sepsis become apparent.…”
Section: Patients Who Develop Sirs Have a Greater Proportion Of Cd14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"dditionally, TLR4 inhibitors such as T"K-242 and eritoran showed promising responses in animal studies for severe sepsis, but failed to show any eicacy in reducing 28-day mortality in phase III clinical trials [114, 11 ]. Though these molecules are still being evaluated for other pathologic conditions such as obesity in type 2 diabetic subjects [116], no clinical trials have been undertaken using these compounds to ameliorate chronic pain conditions.…”
Section: Translational Potential Of Treatable Targets-based Pharmacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a separate study acute doses of aprepitant were shown to signiicantly increase the magnitude of mu agonist signs and symptoms in response to oxycodone [113]. Considering the role of SP in sickle pain and neurogenic inlammation, NK-1 receptor antagonists require further examination in preclinical models of SCD as co-drugs."dditionally, TLR4 inhibitors such as T"K-242 and eritoran showed promising responses in animal studies for severe sepsis, but failed to show any eicacy in reducing 28-day mortality in phase III clinical trials [114, 11 ]. Though these molecules are still being evaluated for other pathologic conditions such as obesity in type 2 diabetic subjects [116], no clinical trials have been undertaken using these compounds to ameliorate chronic pain conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study indicated that, among 235 patients who succumbed to sepsis or septic shock-associated mortality, those exhibiting cardiovascular system failure accounted for 35.3% (5). As the inflammatory reaction is important in sepsis, previous studies have attempted to use monoclonal antibodies raised against specific inflammatory factor receptors to inhibit the inflammatory reaction (2,6). However, sepsis results from interactions among various inflammatory factors and, as a result, treatments based on monoclonal antibodies lose their therapeutic potential due to the targeting of a single receptor (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%