Product design dimensional specifications provide estimates of what the next process will require to ultimately produce desired finished vehicle specifications. During stamping and body assembly manufacturing validation activities, manufacturers typically reassess these original specifications and make adjustments as needed for monitoring product quality during regular production. These tolerance adjustment practices vary considerably between manufacturers, and often even within an organization. In some cases, different teams working in the same launch program may use different approaches. This paper describes the application of a methodology that was developed and has been adopted by a North American OEM as a standard practice for dimensional evaluation and revision of sheet metal components. The methodology was validated during a recent vehicle program launch by calculating tolerance recommendations for several stamping parts. The results showed that the methodology was able to predict over 90% of the actual variation levels and subsequent process monitoring demands observed later in production.
Several manufacturers are adopting six sigma programs in efforts to reduce stamping variation. This requires the crucial step of establishing dimensional relationships for the stamping dimensional outputs that become key process inputs to the assembly process. This paper describes a methodology used to determine the root cause of dimensional changes in a front door assembly. Among the key findings in this study are the importance of understanding the effects of the datum-locating scheme and the significant influence of assembly processing variables, rather than stamping variability, on the final door assembly dimensional quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.